Oldbloke wrote:Wapiti wrote:Thanks fellas. A real help.
I did see that The Barn advertised that Trailboss was back again but I'm going to have some trouble getting to Oakey, bugger. I will try and swing a trip but there was quite a heap of customers hanging out waiting for some so I might be out of luck.
But I bought up on 2206H ages ago because it is so flexible here, both 223 and 308. I will have to research a load, but I'm dubious about any info from the USA.
If anyone has used a powder charge with 06H at around that 1070fps, that'd be great too.
I have 900 of those Sierra 125gn Matchkings that were very cheap.
Why would you be dubious regarding data from Hodgen?
I think the vast majority of ADI/Hodgdon data is merely calculated, I think very little of it is derived from actual testing. But it is only load data, its only purpose is to give you some idea of the region of charge weights you want to start playing within while developing your own data. I did most of my own subsonic AR2206H development with 8x57mm, .303, .223 and 7mm-08, which gave me enough real-world experience to work up subsonic loads in any chambering I'm playing with. I make an educated guess at where I'm likely to wind up subsonic with whichever bullet I'm using in whichever rifle I'm using, add a fair bit to make life easier (take a good rod with you, not a cleaning rod - I'm using 300mm lengths of 5mm brass rod for clearing squibs). I make a round up and shoot it into the ground over the chrono, reload the same piece of brass with another charge, shoot it over the chrono, and so on until I wind up around 1070fps. It can be worth firing a test round first so your piece of brass is fireformed or you may see quite a discrepancy in velocity with the second load (a virgin piece will have less case volume than one that is fireformed, thus will make higher pressure). When I reach that point I'll load ten or twenty rounds and shoot them for groups and to ensure I don't get any anomalous sonic cracks. Usually I don't have any difficulty getting adequate accuracy for the close ranges I want to use subs for, but it is possible you might want to try to improve the load. Try crimping for a start as it's quick and easy and can add a little more time to build pressure, or add some filler material to keep the powder around the primer rather than laying in the bottom of the case.
Regarding load data with AR2206H and 125gn, with the bullets seated as deep as possible, I would start with around 20gn over a chronograph first and work down until you find where you want to be. Then I would load ten at that and shoot them for groups as well as over the chronograph to see if they're accurate and consistent. Barrel length will play a very significant role if you want all your shots to remain subsonic so chrono the load in any other rifle before assuming it will be subsonic. If you expect to ever need to use the load with a suppressor I would drop the the velocity further, to around 1050fps, to ensure the suppressor doesn't punch it up to sonic velocities.
I just had a Google, this guy tested subsonic H4895 behind 190gn jacketed bullets -
https://ultimatereloader.com/2023/08/18/amazing-308-subsonic-loads-and-fun-too/ He went too low though and got poor results, but doesn't seem to have tried to improve the load at all. He used Hodgdon's data, with an expected velocity of 1044fps, but it only gave him 802fps and he left it at that. I think he let himself down by not doing any further testing with it. He went with Trailboss instead, which is my first recommendation, if you can get it.
Hodgdon claims 24" barrel length for this data but I don't believe that. Start high (especially if you have a long barrel) and work down, or take a rod with you to punch the bullets out of the barrel. I doubt shooting subsonic loads has any detrimental effect on the brass (quite the opposite I reckon) but I like to keep my subsonic brass separated from my high-velocity brass just for consistency. I figure if I work up a load that is just subsonic, then fire a full-noise charge in that case the case will probably expand more, increasing its volume so when I then load subsonic I might see a discrepancy - I like consistency.