223 Proj's Sectioned

Reloading equipment, methods, load data, powder and projectile information.

223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 23 May 2015, 12:38 pm

Bored today and have to stay at home. So thought I would go out into the cave and have a play.

I filed 2 55gr 223 projectiles in half today. (obviously these ones are at the cheaper end of the market)

One was a Hornady 55gr. SP (currently used by me for the odd fox) Weighed 4 and all were within 0.2 of a gr of the nominal 55gn

And a pulled 55gn from a S&B round. Weighed 4 and varied from .3 gn under to .6 gr over the nominal 55gn

(Pls note there are some dents in underside of the S&B proj, this damage is due to the way I pulled the projectiles)

Both had lead harder than normal lead,,about the same hardness as my cast projectiles. ( basic scratch test )

IMG_0568.JPG
Filing in vice
IMG_0568.JPG (1.2 MiB) Viewed 5285 times


IMG_0572.JPG
Both cut in half
IMG_0572.JPG (451.31 KiB) Viewed 5285 times


IMG_0578.JPG
Both with lead melted
IMG_0578.JPG (474.07 KiB) Viewed 5285 times


Initial conclusions:
1. The S&B looks to be a slightly different metal & perhaps a little thicker all round.
2. The Hornady seems to have pure copper & thinner at the nose, & I expect would open up a little quicker.
3. Neither have anything built into the design to help hold the projectile together as in more expensive projectiles.
4. S&B projectiles vary a hell of a lot in weight. This would explain my 4" groups from the Sellier & Bellot ammo in my Marlin. :thumbsdown:
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by brett1868 » 23 May 2015, 6:22 pm

You should get bored more often if you do educational things like this :) Definitely some differences in jackets between the 2 and Hornady are looking the better for quality. I noticed on the Hornady a difference in jacket thickness between the Ogive & Meplat with the left side appearing thinner which would have a slight impact on accuracy. What sort of groups you getting from them?
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 23 May 2015, 7:29 pm

Mmmm,, I hadnt noticed the variation in the hornady jacket. Without any experimentation to speak of Im getting .7 moa out of the hornadys and I am definately an amature target shooter. Good enough for my use. Will tinker further when Im bored and the weather is kind, but currently too busy trying to find time to use them on foxes. Mainly because the fallow are calling me. ;)

ps. I do this stuff besause there is a lot of missinformation out there and Im a curious old bastard.
Last edited by Oldbloke on 23 May 2015, 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bluerob » 24 May 2015, 9:27 am

I tried some S&B Match branded ammo in .223 last week. Couldn't hold a group.

Tried Winchester Match ammo and I was tack driving at 130m.

The S&B brass might be ok to reload, but, their factory ammo is crap.

I've seen different loads in a box of S&B .22 pistol in use. Some went bang and others you hardly heard?

Glad that I reload. I'll never buy S&B factory ammo again.
bluerob
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 342
New South Wales

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 24 May 2015, 11:21 am

"I'll never buy S&B factory ammo again." Same here.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 24 May 2015, 12:41 pm

Here's some .224 projectiles I sectioned about 4yrs ago

From L to R Sierra Blitz Varminter 40gn, Sierra BK 50gn, Nosler Solid Base 50gn, Sierra Super Roo 55gn, Nolser BT 50gn, Hornady V-Max 50gn, notice the Noslers have a real thick solid base compared to the others, the Nosler Solid Base definitely penetrated and killed better than some of the other offerings I've seen used. (they sounded like they hit harder and were a instant drop on the spot compared to the others that were being trialed at the time where run offs were a common result (not that they ran far but there was a noticeable diff in performance considering they were the same gn weight.

Image
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 24 May 2015, 9:01 pm

Cool Scott. Dont supose you have a clearer pic. They seem to be a little out of focus.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 24 May 2015, 9:16 pm

Cool Scott. Dont supose you have a clearer pic. They seem to be a little out of focus.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 24 May 2015, 9:44 pm

I do have a better one somewhere but buggered if I can find it, so that's it for now (still might have the cutaways somewhere?
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by deye243 » 24 May 2015, 11:28 pm

Scott i have a sneaking suspicion that the vmax is 55g
User avatar
deye243
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2243
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 24 May 2015, 11:33 pm

deye243 wrote:Scott i have a sneaking suspicion that the vmax is 55g


It could be D, been a long time since I did it, just trying to remember if it was the 50 or 55? :D The others I'm certain of. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by deye243 » 24 May 2015, 11:38 pm

mo probs just it ain't got a BT
User avatar
deye243
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2243
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 24 May 2015, 11:53 pm

deye243 wrote:mo probs just it ain't got a BT


Yeah it doesn't look like its got a Boat Tail in the pic, if I can fine em again I'll let you know but I'd say you are right (I must have bought a pk of 55's to try in the 250? :unknown: I really liked the Nosler Solid Based Projies - they were great at killing stuff quickly, I guess the closest to it now is their BT range (has the same solid base) but I'm pretty sure I tried them and I still reckoned the Solid Base Lead Tipped jobbies did a better job (I guess they just penetrated that little bit better) :unknown:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by deye243 » 25 May 2015, 12:25 am

yeah i used the 50g BT for around 10 years now use the 55 varmageddon tipped and they are a better pill AFAIC they red mist small thing heaps better

but still penetrate roos at all range's and you know i like to stretch things a bit...
User avatar
deye243
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2243
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 25 May 2015, 6:25 am

Yeah I wouldn't mind giving those varmageddons a run one day, they'd be fun on fur I reckon, Those Solid based Noslers made a very distinct sound when they hit (very noticeable when compared with the Sierra BK) which was also being used at the time.

Have you tried the Sierra Super Roos? they go real well too, they kill very well indeed too, I redmisted a fox a few year back at 270m under lights using one out of the 22.250 Howso under the light, looked like a firecracker when off (massive fan shaped explosion) nailed it right in the heart/Lung area from memory - very spectacular to see indeed. :D
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Hercl » 25 May 2015, 2:33 pm

I never got the difference of the Super Roos, they're just Game Kings as far as I can tell?
What is this "too many rifles" you speak of?
User avatar
Hercl
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 246
New South Wales

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Chronos » 25 May 2015, 2:46 pm

Hercl wrote:I never got the difference of the Super Roos, they're just Game Kings as far as I can tell?


my un derstanding is they are game king seconds, could be urban myth though :unknown:

Steve
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2082
New South Wales

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 25 May 2015, 3:33 pm

Hercl wrote:I never got the difference of the Super Roos, they're just Game Kings as far as I can tell?


Yeah mate they are the Game Kings in Bulk packs for roo shooters. They sell em in Africa too under the name of "Super Bok" got a box of them sitting the on the shelves too.

As for being seconds I'd highly doubt it, if these are seconds and shoot like this I wonder what the 1st would be like? :lol:

They are a very good all round hunting projectile that can handle pigs, foxes, rabbits, Roos - excellent value for $$$ and if they made em for the 204 I'd be using em in that too :D

For $110 for a box of 1000 I got no complaints! :D

Hardox 500 plate penetrated by the 55gn Sierra Super Roo from a 22-250 @ 80m from memory (other splash marks are from 338 Lap, 308's, 223 and 222
Image

Howa 22-250 @ 100m shooting off a bipod and rear homemade sand bag.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by veep » 26 May 2015, 2:22 pm

bigfellascott wrote:Hardox 500 plate penetrated by the 55gn Sierra Super Roo from a 22-250 @ 80m from memory (other splash marks are from 338 Lap, 308's, 223 and 222


The 22-250 really does a number on the gongs.

STS Targets had an example gong out at the Shot Shot by a bunch of different calibres including .338 and 22-250.

The .338 group just looks like the paint was missing from the target, the 22-250 shots all created little wells in the metal 1-2 mm deep.

Goes hard for a little bugger.
User avatar
veep
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 197
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 26 May 2015, 2:27 pm

veep wrote:
bigfellascott wrote:Hardox 500 plate penetrated by the 55gn Sierra Super Roo from a 22-250 @ 80m from memory (other splash marks are from 338 Lap, 308's, 223 and 222


The 22-250 really does a number on the gongs.

STS Targets had an example gong out at the Shot Shot by a bunch of different calibres including .338 and 22-250.

The .338 group just looks like the paint was missing from the target, the 22-250 shots all created little wells in the metal 1-2 mm deep.

Goes hard for a little bugger.


Yeah mate they are hard on them alright, its all to do with Velocity and projectile diameter from my understanding. Even out to 300m the 250 was leaving the same depth of penetration on mild steel gongs as the 308 (slightly smaller in diameter but pretty much the same penetration so to speak). :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Seconds » 27 May 2015, 3:27 pm

"Velocity kills.........Gongs" :lol:
Sako 85 Hunter
.308 Winchester
User avatar
Seconds
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 357
New South Wales

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by bigfellascott » 27 May 2015, 7:14 pm

Seconds wrote:"Velocity kills.........Gongs" :lol:


It certainly can do depending on proj type/diameter/velocity etc - I was rather surprised when the 250 punched a hole through that Hardox 500 :shock:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 27 May 2015, 8:28 pm

Hardness of projectile has heaps to do with it. More copper, nickel or steel means better penetration. Shape too.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Harper » 01 Jun 2015, 9:59 am

Steel projectiles?
Savage 14/114 American Classic 30-06 Springfield
Savage Axis 25-06 Remington
User avatar
Harper
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 281
Northern Territory

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by Oldbloke » 01 Jun 2015, 6:49 pm

Harper wrote:Steel projectiles?

During ww1 & perhaps ww2 they seem to have used whatever alloy they could find. But some specialised projectiles are made out of hard alloys, SS for example for greater penetration. Collectors would be know more than me.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11291
Victoria

Re: 223 Proj's Sectioned

Post by sarki » 02 Jun 2015, 11:24 am

They must do wonders for barrel life :lol:
Dear Santa,
Please bring me a Desert Tactical Arms SRS-A1 Rifle in .338 Lapua Magnum.
I'll be good with it, I promise!
User avatar
sarki
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 153
New South Wales


Back to top
 
Return to Reloading ammunition