Gaznazdiak wrote:I've been having seriously mixed accuracy problems from Hornady 35gn V-Max.
I have been told so many different conflicting and contradictory theories I'm about ready to chuck them in the dam.
One nong from the LGS even told me my 24" barrel was too long for them
The most common theory was that with such a small bearing surface they were going too quick for the 1:9 twist, but the last try was at 25.5gn of 2206H which is ADI's minumum recommended load.
I'm no Carlos Hathcock by any means, but I missed 4 of the dreaded Tony Raaabbit from under 100m.
I'd have done better with a sling and a rock.
Anybody got any theories?
Can you safely load below minimum?
I usually work on the idea that what the manual says is law and death lies waiting outside the parameters.
southeast varmiter wrote:Reducing below powder manufacture minimum should be discouraged. You can cause an explosion rather than a burn if too much case capacity is open to a certain powders. You’ll blow your face off. Else you’ll get incomplete burning and useless loads.
southeast varmiter wrote:Reducing below powder manufacture minimum should be discouraged. You can cause an explosion rather than a burn if too much case capacity is open to a certain powders. You’ll blow your face off. Else you’ll get incomplete burning and useless loads.
Gaznazdiak wrote:OB, it may seem laughable overkill to be exploding rabbits at 100m with a .223, but the topography and tall trees surrounding the shearing shed and silos and
in2anity wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:OB, it may seem laughable overkill to be exploding rabbits at 100m with a .223, but the topography and tall trees surrounding the shearing shed and silos and
Mate IMO, 100% the 223 will be much better than the 22lr for consistently culling rabbits out to 100m - it's by-construction a varmint round! Good luck (consistently) head-shoting a rabbit at 100m with the 22lr (which you need to do at that distance to guarantee the kill). If you want pinpoint accuracy with the 22lr you need to be using subs, which limits you to probably less than 75m because any breath of wind and your group will blow out to bigger than a bunnies head.
The way I see it, for the guaranteed killing rabbits with a 22lr it's sketchy AF reaching past 75m - sometimes you kill em, sometimes they run away with a slug in them. The 223 on the other hand, it's like a lazer at those distances - just center-of-mass point, zero holdover, and poof, the rabbit is gone!
Gaznazdiak wrote:Gone is right, I have misjudged the downhill angle correction a couple of times and the round has hit the ground under the rabbit, but the force of the Ballistic Tip Nosler going off in the dirt has ripped them up anyway.
The unfortunate individual in the pic was the most spectacular result, with bits of guts 8 foot up the side of the shed and a good 15 feet away from where he was sitting.
I far prefer to obliterate them with overkill than risk a crawl-off.
sungazer wrote:But if the lighter pill actually has to be shot much faster than a heavier one to be accurate it doesn't meet his other objective of not going through the rabbit and damaging buildings or a risk to others as there is no backstop.
It might need a bit of ballistic research to find the right projectile that delivers good accuracy with the least amount but enough energy to do the job. I really think those 32 grn need a faster powder and to be driven faster. A 50grn will be ok with the AR2206H and could be loaded down to a slower MV have the right accuracy and be the best round for the job.
Gwion wrote:Trailboss is cheap and goes a long way in the way of the number of reloads you get from it.
I had a good load for it with 40gn varmint grenades. About 1" at 100m. I ran out of those bullets though. Now load 50gn zmax for decent results. Starts dropping quick past 100m, though.
Just an option.
in2anity wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:Gone is right, I have misjudged the downhill angle correction a couple of times and the round has hit the ground under the rabbit, but the force of the Ballistic Tip Nosler going off in the dirt has ripped them up anyway.
The unfortunate individual in the pic was the most spectacular result, with bits of guts 8 foot up the side of the shed and a good 15 feet away from where he was sitting.
I far prefer to obliterate them with overkill than risk a crawl-off.
Amen. You've just gotta look at the condition of the (rimfire) silhouettes to realise how little energy the 22lr has at 100m (and even 77m) - the 40m chickens are cratered and bent AF, whereas the 100m rams are still absolutely pristine, it's such a good representation of the practical limits of the 22. Not to mention the drop the between a 40m zero and 100m is a full 10moa - any misjudgement of distance between about 65m and 100m and you will outright miss with the 22.
Nah, IMO your heads in the right place trying to optimize the lighter 223 projectile for rabbit control. KISS principle for hunting aye. OFC if you're going for pelts or meat, different story.
Strikey wrote:standard velocity 22lr ammo kills rabbits out to 120yds no problems not that I would recommend it for less experienced shooters.
in2anity wrote:Strikey wrote:standard velocity 22lr ammo kills rabbits out to 120yds no problems not that I would recommend it for less experienced shooters.
Is this based on personal experience is it?? Tell me, what percentage of subsonic, body-shotted rabbits would you say are instantly incapacitated at such distances?