45/70 revolver... Why?

Semi automatic and single shot handguns, revolvers and other pistols

45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by samf » 23 Feb 2014, 2:20 pm

So I understand that this revolver...

45-70-revolver.jpg
45-70 Revolver
45-70-revolver.jpg (58.87 KiB) Viewed 7739 times


...is chambered in 45-70. A classic rifle cartridge.

Question is, WTF? :lol:

Did people ever shoot these things regularly or is this just over-the-top yanks getting crazy with their pistols?

I can only imagine it's murder on the recoil.
User avatar
samf
Private
Private
 
Posts: 74
Victoria

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by samf » 23 Feb 2014, 2:20 pm

Er, the top revolver too obviously. Not the bottom one :lol:
User avatar
samf
Private
Private
 
Posts: 74
Victoria

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by feedr » 23 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm

From the days when men where tough!

:lol:
Tikka T3 Lite Stainless in .308 Winchester.
User avatar
feedr
Private
Private
 
Posts: 72
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Deco » 23 Feb 2014, 3:10 pm

If I remember right it was so cowboys (proper ones) didn't have to carry two lots of ammo.

Got your rifle, got your pistol, and don't have to load yourself up with stuff that's half useless.
Browning X-Bolt Hunter in .270 Winchester
User avatar
Deco
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 113
South Australia

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Humir » 24 Feb 2014, 10:00 am

I was the standard Texas Ranger loadout or something way back when wasn't it.

1 rifle, 1 pistol, both chambered in 45-70. Like Deco said, both in 45-70 so you weren't carrying round heaps of ammo you weren't likely to use.

Weights probably more important when you're riding a horse, not a Land Cruiser :lol:
User avatar
Humir
Private
Private
 
Posts: 90
Tasmania

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by yoshie » 24 Feb 2014, 7:09 pm

Why not
User avatar
yoshie
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 641
Australian Capital Territory

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Warrigul » 25 Feb 2014, 12:19 pm

Humir wrote:I was the standard Texas Ranger loadout or something way back when wasn't it.

1 rifle, 1 pistol, both chambered in 45-70. Like Deco said, both in 45-70 so you weren't carrying round heaps of ammo you weren't likely to use.

Weights probably more important when you're riding a horse, not a Land Cruiser :lol:


You might be thinking of .44/40

I would be happy to be corrected if neccesary though.
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Humir » 25 Feb 2014, 2:23 pm

You could be right, or maybe it was both.

Principle is the same anyway though... carrying an pistol chambered for a rifle cartridge so you don't have to carry 2 lots of ammo.

Guys probably used either depending on their preferred cartridge too I guess.
User avatar
Humir
Private
Private
 
Posts: 90
Tasmania

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by 1886 » 01 Mar 2014, 12:09 am

Warrigul is correct.

Its the 44/40 that was for both Cowboy revolvers and rifles.

The 45/70 revolvers etc are only recent developments and there are many larger rifle calibres now being made in revolvers right up to the 900 Nitro Express !!!!!

The 45/70 and the Smith & Wesson 460 Weatherby magnum revolvers are popular in Australia for metallic silouette. I have shot both and whilst they do have a good kick its not as bad as you might think as most also come with muzzle brakes.
1886
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 126
Western Australia

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Seconds » 01 Mar 2014, 7:33 am

1886 wrote:there are many larger rifle calibres now being made in revolvers right up to the 900 Nitro Express!


s**t really? :lol:

I bet a lot of people only fire one of those once...
Sako 85 Hunter
.308 Winchester
User avatar
Seconds
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 357
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Seconds » 01 Mar 2014, 7:41 am

One for fun... I *think* this is a Remington Model 1859...

remington-model-1859.jpg
Remington Model 1859
remington-model-1859.jpg (29.28 KiB) Viewed 7627 times


Recoil much? :lol:
Sako 85 Hunter
.308 Winchester
User avatar
Seconds
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 357
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by 1290 » 01 Mar 2014, 3:56 pm

When it comes to firearms, never ask why.....

Ask why NOT!!!

More Bang. More noise, more smoke, more force and more fun.

running some numbers the free recoil for an ADI pistol loadings; 45/70 300gr 101J, 485gr 71.8J comparing a 500S&W 500gr loading at 96J assuming a 3.5lb revolver....

this compares to 21J for a 44RemMag 240gr loading
& 64J for a 338LapMag 250gr loading from a 10lb rifle....

yiiiiiiihaaaa
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by 1290 » 01 Mar 2014, 4:11 pm

thats not an Remington model 1859; the Rem 185x/186x were blackpowder in such hi-po chamberings as 44 Rimfire, maybe 36cal etc, the one in to pic is a modern scaled up version of something firing a 600 or thereabouts....
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by SendIt » 01 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm

1886 wrote:I have shot both and whilst they do have a good kick its not as bad as you might think as most also come with muzzle brakes.


Different for a pistol too IMO.

Rifle recoil all goes directly into your shoulder, pistol you've got a foot of air swing to wash away some of it.
Sako 85 Hunter Laminated Stainless 30-06 Sprg
Zeiss Conquest HD5 2-10x42

Winchester 1892 44-40
User avatar
SendIt
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 477
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Seconds » 01 Mar 2014, 5:14 pm

1290 wrote:thats not an Remington model 1859; the Rem 185x/186x were blackpowder in such hi-po chamberings as 44 Rimfire, maybe 36cal etc, the one in to pic is a modern scaled up version of something firing a 600 or thereabouts....


Ah my bad. That was just the file name when I saved it.

Too much pistol for me in any case :lol:
Sako 85 Hunter
.308 Winchester
User avatar
Seconds
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 357
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by 1886 » 01 Mar 2014, 10:35 pm

No idea whether this one is legit but if so, it has to be the grand daddy of them all.

50BMG revolver ???? You would need some serious gonads to fire this :D

Image
1886
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 126
Western Australia

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by bawoog » 02 Mar 2014, 7:45 am

I'd be firing it with a piece of string tied to the trigger from 10 metres away :lol:
User avatar
bawoog
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 42
Tasmania

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by FourFingersof Death » 03 Mar 2014, 10:08 am

The 454Casull is a slightly stretched 45Colt with a much tougher constructed case and it is a kick ass calibre.

BFR turned out the 45/70 as it performs better than the Casull at a third to a half of the pressure.

The 454 runs 66,000psi, more that most bolt guns.

The Texas Rangers probably used the 45/70 as well, but their main carbine was the Sharps in 50/90. That would have been an absolute bear of a rifle, but would have killed horses emphatically, which was what their aim was, once afoot, bandidos were easily beat.

The 45/70 Government was developed for the military and used in the Trapdoor Springfield rifles, which were converted from muzzle loaders. Similar to the way we converted rifles into the 577Snider.
FourFingersof Death
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 13
New South Wales

Re: 45/70 revolver... Why?

Post by Bark » 03 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm

I'm a bit sus on that 50 cal pistol.

Looks a bit funny around the pistol and her hands? Photoshopped?
User avatar
Bark
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 219
Victoria


Back to top
 
Return to Pistols - Semi-automatic handguns and revolvers