in2anity wrote:I found this quote about Annie actions which I thought was nicely worded: "The 54 is a work of art. Glides like butter and locks up like a bank vault. The 64 is a more utilitarian design. Light weight and simple. Whilst the 54 is usually used in Olympic shooting, the accuracy is predominantly in the barrel." <EDIT: paraphrased a little to be more truthful>
Sounds about right,
in2anity wrote:bigfellascott wrote:not sure how it shot group wise as I wasn't thinking about that sort of thing back then
It's funny you say that; I have the
exact same memories about my childhood - the thought never occurred to me to ever systematically gauge the accuracy of the various rifles and air-guns I had
(access to) - so long as they hit what I pointed at I was happy. I wish I could go back and test them, because nowadays I'm so curious about such things...
Yeah it was never something that entered my mind as child and even today I tend not to focus to much on that side of things, I'm happy if something can shoot around 1inch or there abouts - good enough for hunting purposes for 99% of shooting situations from my experience.
Sadly hunters all think we need every bullet in the same hole or else their rifles are duds and need replacing with a "Better one" fact is there are a lot more variables happening out in the paddock and we generally don't have the luxury of a flash rest and rear bags and time to concentrate on our breathing and known distances etc etc, it's pretty much spot what you want to shoot, line it up and take the shot before it buggers off.
I've still got handloads I haven't tested on paper that I still use to shoot bunnies out around 270m+ with good consistency, for all I know the shoot like crap on paper but they work in the field and that's all I care about, same goes for some of the 22 ammo I use for hunting, some of it's only good for around the 1inch mark on paper but out in the field I seem to hit the majority of stuff I use it on so I guess it's good enough for the job but those who would shoot it on paper would scoff at the idea of using it for hunting because it doesn't shoot all in the same hole.
I think the thing that getting small groups does however is give you some confidence that your outfit shoots fine and I guess that's not a bad thing to have but it's only part of the big picture as far as I'm concerned.
Diff matter of course if you are target shooting and I guess what level of target shooting one participates in (ie olympic or just a bit of fun at the range trying to shoot good groups) will determine what type/brand of rifle one buys.
I've got a mate who's got a fully tricked out Brno Mod 2 I think it is all built by Redback Precision if memory serves me correctly and it cost up around the $6k mark from memory, he's not a competitor as such but just liked the outfit and got it for a good price apparently (I think he picked it up for around $3k) so a good buy I guess (way too much to spend on a rifle for a bit of plinking at the range in my opinion but he's happy to drop that sort of coin so so be it, his decision.
Me I'm just a pure hunter these days and I'm glad to not be all caught up in the tiny groups is a must mindset anymore.
