New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Rimfire bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action and self loading rifles. Air rifles.

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by bladeracer » 13 Jun 2018, 10:03 pm

TBJ wrote: I'm with you on this, although I'm more of a Winchester man so I'm going to say 94/22lr


I have the Norinco JW21 copy of the 9422 and the Henry Classic. The feed system of the JW21 does not impress me, especially compared to the virtually "controlled-feed" system of the Henry. I've compared the JW21 to the 9422 and the parts are identical. The JW21 is a little more accurate and better assembled than the Henry (both of which may only apply to my own examples), and it is quite reliable while it's clean, but by about 300-500rds it's pretty filthy inside and feeding becomes problematic. I very slightly prefer the feel of the Norinco over the Henry but there's little in it.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12681
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by Daddybang » 14 Jun 2018, 6:53 am

[/quote]
I'm with you on this, although I'm more of a Winchester man so I'm going to say 94/22lr[/quote]

I love my 94/22...a good robust rifle that's accurate(for a lever) and a lot of fun to shoot :thumbsup:
The only problem it's ever given me was the follower was getting stuck but a good spray with inox sorted that out!! :thumbsup: :drinks:
This hard living ain't as easy as it used to be!!!
Daddybang
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2012
Queensland

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by bigrich » 14 Jun 2018, 7:06 am

You can’t go wrong with a weihrauch. Excellent build quality and very accurate. Excellent adjustable trigger
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by southwest shooter » 14 Jun 2018, 9:56 am

Henry still the best .
southwest shooter
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 289
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by albat » 14 Jun 2018, 11:35 am

what about the new lever release savage's advertised yesterday coming in september rimfire version of the verney carron would make an excellent first .22
albat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 441
Queensland

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by TBJ » 14 Jun 2018, 11:38 am

bigrich wrote:You can’t go wrong with a weihrauch. Excellent build quality and very accurate. Excellent adjustable trigger


What model for a heavy barrel? also what about the availability of mods for it?
Have: .17H .22LR .204R .222REM .223REM .22-250 .243WIN .270WIN .308WIN .300WM 7.62x39 30-06SPRG .303BRIT 30-30WIN 9.3x62 45-70GOVT 44RMAG 45LC 20GA 12GA .410GA
Want: .220SWIFT 6.5CREED .260REM .375H&H .416RIGBY .444MARLIN .458WIN 16GA 28GA
TBJ
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 166
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by allan » 14 Jun 2018, 1:38 pm

TBJ wrote:
bigrich wrote:You can’t go wrong with a weihrauch. Excellent build quality and very accurate. Excellent adjustable trigger


What model for a heavy barrel? also what about the availability of mods for it?


If you're looking for a heavy barrel and want to pay for a rifle that will last generations - These three:

WEIHRAUCH HW66JM
ANSCHUTZ 1710
LITHGOW LA101 (In a laminated or timber stock)

No mods. required for any of these. I have a couple of each brand and all are about as good as it gets in mass produced rim fires - Just comes down to which style appeals to you most.
allan
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 202
Other

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by TBJ » 14 Jun 2018, 1:54 pm

allan wrote:
TBJ wrote:
bigrich wrote:You can’t go wrong with a weihrauch. Excellent build quality and very accurate. Excellent adjustable trigger


What model for a heavy barrel? also what about the availability of mods for it?


If you're looking for a heavy barrel and want to pay for a rifle that will last generations - These three:

WEIHRAUCH HW66JM
ANSCHUTZ 1710
LITHGOW LA101 (In a laminated or timber stock)

No mods. required for any of these. I have a couple of each brand and all are about as good as it gets in mass produced rim fires - Just comes down to which style appeals to you most.


thanks, I'll have a look into them, whats the difference between the 1710 and the 1410?
Have: .17H .22LR .204R .222REM .223REM .22-250 .243WIN .270WIN .308WIN .300WM 7.62x39 30-06SPRG .303BRIT 30-30WIN 9.3x62 45-70GOVT 44RMAG 45LC 20GA 12GA .410GA
Want: .220SWIFT 6.5CREED .260REM .375H&H .416RIGBY .444MARLIN .458WIN 16GA 28GA
TBJ
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 166
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by meawls » 14 Jun 2018, 2:25 pm

Own an example of all three ... all fairly recent purchases. Have done benchrest style load development in all three using around 13 available cartridge configurations. Here's the results, from 5 shot groups at 50M (best performers only):

Lithgow LA101: Federal 714 Standard velocity = 7MM; Bushman HVHP (surprise!) and Winchester Superspeed HVHP (I have a sneaking suspicion they're one and the same!!) = 11MM.
Note: this rifle became noticeably more accurate as it wore in .... much more so than usual. In many cases the group sizes halved!! This rifle will NOT extract ANY Winchester loadings - even the Plano box bulk 2000 pack from USA. There must be an issue with their cases. It's been back to the factory and tweeked under warranty - it originally wouldn't extract ANYTHING!! The factory were extremely good about it. I won't send it back again ... just avoid Winchester stuff. This rifle ships with a polymer 5 round magazine. It has an extremely frustrating habit of failing to feed the final (5th) round very regularly ... however it cycles faultlessly with CZ magazines ...?!?! Moral of the story - throw away your Lithgow mag (if this happens to you)??!!

CZ 455: Federal 714 Standard Velocity = 0.456" ... likewise Winchester SubSonics.
Note: ours is the limited edition Bushman Special. Comes with a terrific red stock (beech???) embellished with black paint - but beware if you happen to shoot in damp conditions - this black paint comes off ... and STAINS YOUR HANDS!!! This rifle shoots and extracts everything and anything with utter ease.

CZ 452:Federal 745 HVHP = 0.607". Interestingly, Remingtom CBee ultra low velocity HP's shot 0.418" at 35M. The single most accurate reading I've seen for any ultra low.
Note: ours is the Ultralux long barrelled type. This rifle is still quite new, and the group sizes have improved ... although unfortunately I have yet to properly benchrest it again now that it's properly "worn in", so can't give you exact figures.

General notes: the above measurements were all measured accurately with calipers. Here's the cool thing - all 3 rifles use the standard CZ magazines. They all feel good in the hands ... although the Lithgow took some getting used to at the start. It's a very unusual stock configuration ... but I love it now, and that weird butt sits really well on the bench. It really feels solid too, whereas the CZ's feel ... I dunno ... more feminine perhaps for want of a better word. More slender and a little lighter. Honestly I love all three, and in my opinion you'd probably be happy with whatever you bought. I would gladly buy each again in hindsight. Be aware if you're looking at the CZ Ultralux - it has some truly classy iron sights on it. Unless you remove the rear one you'll be really handicapped in terms of the scope's objective lens possibly contacting the sight's body.

Enjoy!!!
meawls
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 42
Queensland

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by sungazer » 14 Jun 2018, 8:02 pm

The Winchester ammo wont extract out of my Anni either. Well it wont extract unfired rounds fired rounds no problems. What is happening in my rifle is that it is jamming the projectiles. In some ways I take this as a good thing as it means the chamber is a good size and most of the ammo sits just off the lands a good thing.
What is the case with the Lithgow is it just unfired rounds or the spent cases as well?
sungazer
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1525
Other

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by meawls » 22 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm

In the case of the Lithgow, it's only fired cases that won't extract. And they're tenacious too. Have to use a cleaning rod from the muzzle end, sometimes needing quite a shove. Doesn't matter how clean the chamber is. Only happens with Winchester. As I mentioned in the Highland ZX ammo thread, those cases in particular get ejected sparkling clean after firing, so it definitely isn't a lack of cleaning that's the problem.
meawls
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 42
Queensland

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by Gaznazdiak » 22 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm

fideles usque ad mortem
User avatar
Gaznazdiak
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1379
New South Wales

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by TBJ » 22 Jun 2018, 7:27 pm

Gaznazdiak wrote:http://www.lithgowarms.com/lithgow-arms-launches-10-year-manufactures-warranty-for-all-la101-la102-and-la105-rifles/?utm_source=Lithgow+Arms&utm_campaign=188a54996f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_08_02_33&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_15fa113e46-188a54996f-493600885


Geez, 10years is an amazing warranty, shows how confident they are in their products.
Have: .17H .22LR .204R .222REM .223REM .22-250 .243WIN .270WIN .308WIN .300WM 7.62x39 30-06SPRG .303BRIT 30-30WIN 9.3x62 45-70GOVT 44RMAG 45LC 20GA 12GA .410GA
Want: .220SWIFT 6.5CREED .260REM .375H&H .416RIGBY .444MARLIN .458WIN 16GA 28GA
TBJ
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 166
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by Gwion » 23 Jun 2018, 10:51 am

TBJ wrote:
Gaznazdiak wrote:http://www.lithgowarms.com/lithgow-arms-launches-10-year-manufactures-warranty-for-all-la101-la102-and-la105-rifles/?utm_source=Lithgow+Arms&utm_campaign=188a54996f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_08_02_33&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_15fa113e46-188a54996f-493600885


Geez, 10years is an amazing warranty, shows how confident they are in their products.


Usual warranties are voided if you feed it hand loads or change anything like trigger components
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by ClaytonT88 » 26 Aug 2018, 4:32 pm

Following with interest as I'm in the same boat. I've only just applied for my licence here in SA so I'm still a month or two away from making a purchase at least, I'm really keen to see a T1X in the flesh and see some reviews on it before I make the choice between either an LA101 or a T1X.
I love the idea of buying an Australian made Rifle but the weight does seem like a bit of a drawback, I'll be mostly hunting foxes and rabbits with the plan to do the odd bit of range shooting.
I'm still tossing up between a 22LR and a 17HMR as well. I like the idea of 17HMR for its accuracy and range and it's probably a bit more potent against bunnies and foxes but I like the idea of spending less than a dollar a shot....
Easy come, easy go.

Tikka T1X 22LR - VX Freedom 3-9X40
User avatar
ClaytonT88
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 194
South Australia

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by Lsfan » 04 Feb 2021, 7:25 pm

Hi all. I’ve got a cz455 synthetic carbon. Only used a few times at a range and pretty happy with it. Yes it does have the little infill beside the mag to allow for the .17hmr or 22wmr mag. This is not a negative since it allows the flexibility to use 3 different calibers. Would’ve liked a timber stock but on a tight budget.
Lsfan
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 313
New South Wales

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by NTSOG » 05 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm

G'day TBJ,

If you're looking at a Weihrauch be sure to check the quality and alignment of the stock. I have an HW 60 J in .222 Rem. The stock was not true from new and required relieving as it was warped, bending to the left. The rifle action is brilliant and now, as the rifle has been professionally bedded and the barrel floated, the thing is good for inch groups at 100 yards. It has a heavier barrel than my Anschutz 1532, also in .222 Rem. One other thing a Pommy shooter told me about was that he was having trouble with spent cases jamming after firing in his Weihrauch. I have had no problems.

Jim
NTSOG
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 555
Victoria

Re: New .22LR? CZ452 vs CZ455 vs Lithgow LA101?

Post by Tubs » 05 Feb 2021, 2:22 pm

Just bought a CZ 455 rip off / Hatsan Escort 22LR Timber for aprox 380 bucks. I'm impressed!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=wJjJxlQf0qQ
Tubs
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 306
New South Wales

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Rimfire rifles, and air rifles