Urastus wrote: Have you put a bigger pad on the stock for extra lop? And your nikon - that was my first choice; great optics and adjustable objective for a reasonable price. What is the min focus on yours? If it's 10 yards where and when did you buy it? It's hard to get reliable info on that scope here in Aus. Which do you prefer between the nikon and the leupold?
Out of the prw's and the zees, which do you prefer?
Both our LA101's have the factory pads - These stocks fit a wide range of build types - My very small wife and I have no eye relief problems shooting these rifles as pictured.
The AO on my Nikon goes down to 10 yards. It came fitted to a SH Weihrauch HW60J I bought. For the price, these are excellent scopes - I've had this on several very accurate 22's to check tracking and reliability and I can't fault it. Very clear, duplex/dot OK for all round use - Only possible issue for some is that the clicks are 1/4 at 50 YARDS - No biggie for me.
http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/en/niko ... s-OverviewThe Leupold 3-9X33EFR's are about as good as it gets in a small, compact scope and will handle recoil fine too.
If a scope in this size and power range meets your requirements, here is another excellent option:
https://www.clearidgeoptics.com/ultra-rm-s/1814.htmI own several Clearidge scopes - These are real "sleepers" in the optics world.
I have no issues with the older style PRW rings - Have no experience with the latest versions but some have had problems with them.
I prefer the Signature rings with inserts. They won't ever mark a scope tube and the off set insert kits will correct both windage & elevation variations thus allowing me to mount scopes with the internal adjustments very close to their optical centre - Time consuming and fiddley to mount though.