Usurper wrote:bigfellascott wrote:I don't mind some of the Leupolds myself, my mate had one on his Ansultz 22 (can't remember the model) but I think it had a 50mm objective and it was very good under the light (slightly brighter than the Nikon from memory) but not much in it and the Nikon was better in the daylight when it came to contrast etc for whatever reason.
For a walk about their VX1 are perfect and aren't expensive.
Yep good enough to do the job no worries at all, I really don't see the sense in spending huge $$ on a scope for a 22, it just isn't warranted IMO, its like you are shooting long range where good glass shines etc, no need for fiddling with dials to take long shots, all you need is something simple that is reliable and clear under normal hunting type conditions and I'd reckon the large majority reasonably priced scopes would fit that bill fine.