Tomek wrote:I am in the process of getting into hunting. I have always read that anything over .22 would be too strong if I plan to eat the rabbit. Photos I've seen also suggest that the damage done is too great. However, these rabbits looked unscathed despite having a high enough calibre to get headshots from just under 300m. What's the truth lol? Is the .22-50 a good compromise?
If you shoot them in the head with the 250 it will surgically remove it with little damage to the torso ,cannot comment on ranges below 300 cos when I use the 250 the starting point is 400 sometimes 300.
Past 400 if you shoot them in the chest (with a side on shot) the bullet will destroy edible meat but if you cut away the front paws and rib cage the saddle (back) and rear legs are normally ok for cooking.with no damage to the meat.
If your just getting into hunting I would get a good quality .223, tikka is a good brand, the 250 is a pretty gutsy round and if you dont hit them right you will turn them into pizza.
The .223 can easily handle bunnies out to 400yds and if you head shoot them(even under 300) the torso (the whole of the rabbit) should be just fine for the pot.
.223 ammo is cheaper and easier to find than 250 ammo, I recently picked up 200 rounds of 250 (Winchester ballistic silver tips in 55gn) I had them on order for 12 months and when they arrived the price had gone up to $70.00 for 20 round where as the .223 ammo in the same brand and type costs around $35.00 for 20.
If you decide on the 250 you will seriously have to consider hand loading.
cheers.