Ricochet concerns when shooting against rocky areas

[bladeracer]

Exactly! those warnings are for a perfectly formed projectile shot at an exact angle with perfect conditions etc etc, a ricocheted projectile is far from that!

I should've added that at the end of that perfect launch, the bullet is coming into the ground at about 60-degrees, making single-digit energy ft-lbs, and doing less than 300fps.

[marksman]

I should add that a ricochete apparently ricochets off faster than the bullet leaving the barrel
so I have been led to believe

[bladeracer]

I should add that a ricochete apparently ricochets off faster than the bullet leaving the barrel
so I have been led to believe

I'd love to see how they came up with that
So I fire a bullet at 1080fps, and 600m down the track, when it's down to about 500fps, it bounces off a rock at more than double that speed?

[Stix]

I should add that a ricochete apparently ricochets off faster than the bullet leaving the barrel
so I have been led to believe

Hmm...that goes against everything we're told in regards to the laws of physics...

If its true, the guys who came up with this should have the answer to perpetual motion...

AND...we'd be shooting long range bunnies with deflector shields 50 yds in front of the barrel to increase velocity down range...

Hell...imagine a series of carefully placed "ricochet panels" placed all around the world so the bullet travels from one to another increasing in velocity with each deflection--a bullet could get to near light speed doing loops of the earth...

Thats probably why Hdy released their 'non-melting tips...

Imagine a 177 springer flinging lead at mach 679 after a few deflections...

Hadron Collider eat your heart out....

Better wear helmets or duck...

[bigfellascott]

I should add that a ricochete apparently ricochets off faster than the bullet leaving the barrel
so I have been led to believe

Don't recall noticing that with tracers at night, hard to say though, most of em went sideways or up from memory, well they really went everywhere TBH.

[marksman]

its being taught at the firearm safety courses

[TassieTiger]

I should add that a ricochete apparently ricochets off faster than the bullet leaving the barrel
so I have been led to believe

I'd love to see how they came up with that
So I fire a bullet at 1080fps, and 600m down the track, when it's down to about 500fps, it bounces off a rock at more than double that speed?

The same physics say that a bullet rises after it leaves the barrel...

[bladeracer]

:lol:
its being taught at the firearm safety courses

I was impressed with the general lack of understanding of the instructors when I did the course.
One guy was talking about using the wrong ammunition, "What would you expect if you accidentally chamber a .270 in a .30-06?"
"A fire-formed .30-06 case?" was my response, he really had no idea what would happen, but just assumed it would be bad.

[marksman]

:lol:
its being taught at the firearm safety courses

I was impressed with the general lack of understanding of the instructors when I did the course.
One guy was talking about using the wrong ammunition, "What would you expect if you accidentally chamber a .270 in a .30-06?"
"A fire-formed .30-06 case?" was my response, he really had no idea what would happen, but just assumed it would be bad.

yep I've heard similar myself

[xDom]

“..The same physics say that a bullet rises after it leaves the barrel...”


What’s the story with this comment? I’ve heard it before.
I heard that if a .223 is fired horizontally, at 25m and 200m it’ll be at the same height.
Is this right?

[bladeracer]

“..The same physics say that a bullet rises after it leaves the barrel...”


What’s the story with this comment? I’ve heard it before.
I heard that if a .223 is fired horizontally, at 25m and 200m it’ll be at the same height.
Is this right?

Not quite, the story is if you zero an AR15 at 25yd it will also be zeroed at 300yd, nothing to do with anything being horizontal. The bullet travels several inches high en-route.
If you set up any firearm with the bore horizontal, the bullet will begin dropping the instant it leaves the muzzle.

[TassieTiger]

No matter what caliber - it cannot beat gravity.
If you zero a 223 at say 300m - the projectile will be passing up through the line of sight in close proximity to the muzzle, and then “fall” back on to target at 300m. If you were sighted for 300 and then came in and shot a target at say 100 or 150m, the bullet would be high on the target, but not because it’s rinsing if it’s own accord, but because the barrel is angled that way.

I’ve had so many ppl try and tell me that some calibers, rise 1 and even 2 inches after leaving the muzzle...

[Stix]

Well i feel i must correct you guys...

There is one rifle that does shoot bullets that actually DO defy gravity.

Let me explain...

I was at a fella's house having a coffee--we went fishing & csme accross some bunnys & smacked a few as i had my 22 in the car.

So me & this Italian fella were havin a coffee & his cousin rocked up...

We got to chatting about bunny shoot'n in our younger years, & i mentioned that when i was a young teen-13-14 & shooting smallbore in State & National comps, i used to be able to head shoot bunny's oit to a healthy 100 odd yds with my ol'mans Sportco 63A with open sights...

They said that was good, but they believed they were better when they were younger...& they believed (the cousin) held the unofficial record of head shot bunny with a 22lr...!!

Story was something like this--and yes im nearly quoting this word for word...

"Well remember the time we were out & we stole uncle Ezzio's gun...
Yea & temember Tony & Gino were with us...and we saw that rabbit & all you guys were taking shots at it & no one could hit it...then i took the gun & aimed straight at its head & shot the stupid thing right in the head...lol...lol...lol...
Yea mate i remember...
Yea that was amazing--i was such a good shooter when we were teenagers...

(Me)-- so how far was the bunny...?

Oh mate...honestly...it was... ( wait for it...)...it was atleast 1.5...maybe 1.7km's...

(Me)... WWHHHAAAT.... ...nah seriously...what...not 150 metres off the shoulder...?

(Cousin tosser)...mate...mate honestly...i just say it was 1.7 km's cos i dont want to exaggerate...but to be honest it was so close to 2km's you could call it a 2 km shot--AND i aimed straight at its head & hit it right where i aimed...!!..."


These guys are serious...they honestly believe they did this...
True story...!!!

[TassieTiger]

Hahaha a takes all kinds...would a 22 travel that far if it was aimed at 55 degrees ?

[bladeracer]

Hahaha a takes all kinds...would a 22 travel that far if it was aimed at 55 degrees ?

Not a chance in hell, even with a 1000mph tailwind!
One day I want to fire one straight up in the air and time its flight, like Edwin Sarcassion did with the .50BMG - a hundred and ten seconds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY7jZia2dXQ

[xDom]

I've got another ballistics question, might as well keep it in an existing thread.
When people talk about a "flat" shooting round does that equate to a fast round? Is there a direct correlation between a flat round and a fast round?
ie the faster the flatter?

[bladeracer]

I've got another ballistics question, might as well keep it in an existing thread.
When people talk about a "flat" shooting round does that equate to a fast round? Is there a direct correlation between a flat round and a fast round?
ie the faster the flatter?

Yes, in the old days, nowadays not so much. With the very high BC of modern VLD's you don't need lots of speed to shoot flat.
But as a general rule, yes, flattest trajectory comes from highest velocity.
Only really relevant when spotlighting though, where measuring or judging distance can be impossible.

[bladeracer]

I can shoot the 35gn NTX in .223Rem at 3850fps.
A 250m zero puts the bullet about 70mm high at 145m, 125mm low at 300m, 560mm low at 400m, and 1400mm low by 500m but only doing 1250fps by this time. The very light bullet dumps velocity very quickly. A 10mph wind will push the bullet 430mm sideways at 300m, 860mm at 400m, and 1500mm by 500m.

In the same rifle I can shoot the 80gn ELDM at 2800fps and be 100mm high at 145m, 150mm low at 300m, 585mm low at 400m, and 1280mm low at 500m, but still doing 1850fps. A 10mph wind will push the bullet 200mm sideways at 300m, 370mm at 400m, and 600mm by 500m.


Over 1000fps lower velocity with very similar trajectory, but look at the wind advantage the heavier bullet gives you, despite the much lower velocity.

[xDom]

OK, I get that.

As a side question, what's the twist rate of that rifle? You can stabilise a 35gn through to a 80gr?

My .223 is a 1:12, I thought that limited me to a max of about 55gr?

[bladeracer]

OK, I get that.

As a side question, what's the twist rate of that rifle? You can stabilise a 35gn through to a 80gr?

My .223 is a 1:12, I thought that limited me to a max of about 55gr?

8"-twist Ruger American Predator. I have some 90gn Matchkings I want to try as well, they're only slightly longer than the ELDM's so I'm hopeful
12"-twist should be okay for 60gn, maybe a little heavier with flat-based soft-point bullets. Bullet length is what matters, not the weight.

[Stix]

I've got another ballistics question, might as well keep it in an existing thread.
When people talk about a "flat" shooting round does that equate to a fast round? Is there a direct correlation between a flat round and a fast round?
ie the faster the flatter?

The answer is yes, there is a direct correlation...!!

Ill have a crack at explaining it...dunno how sucessful ill be...

So a 22-250 is known as "a flat shooter", where as a 223 is not so known for it.
The 22-250 has bigger case to hold more powder & push bullet out faster than the 223...
So...
Imagine a 50gn bullet shot out of a 223,
Then the same bullet shot out of a 22-250...

The bullet out of the 223 is travelling slower than the one out of the 250, so over any given 100m stretch of flight, the faster travelling bullet has less time for gravity to pull it down toward earth, therefor its 'arc'/trajectory over that given 100m is flatter than the slower moving bullet--(which has more time for gravity to pull it down over that same 100m).

As gravity is a constant value (it will pull a given bullet shot horizontally & travelling at any speed, toward earth the same amount per second (per second)), so the amount of drop over a given distance for that given bullet is determined by its speed.

The same goes for wind...a faster moving bullet wont deviate as much due to wind as the same bullet moving at a slower soeed over a given distance...because the wind has less time to push the bullet 'off track'.

Hope ive explained that well enough to understand easier...

[Stix]

Ok...so you're already past that...yep...im a slow typer with one thumb on a mobile...

As you were...

[xDom]

Ok...so you're already past that...yep...im a slow typer with one thumb on a mobile...

As you were...

Thanks Stix. Cheers Blade

[TassieTiger]

^ that’s a pretty cool visual explanation !

[xDom]

What’s the flattest shooting, commercially available round on the market?

[bladeracer]

What’s the flattest shooting, commercially available round on the market?

At close ranges, probably 40gn VMax .204, or something in .220Swift or .22-250 maybe.
At longer ranges something with heavy ELD bullets.

[xDom]

Would you say my 1:12 .223 Tikka, shooting a 55gr would be far behind these? In the spectrum of rifles, would it be towards the flat shooting end?

[bladeracer]

Would you say my 1:12 .223 Tikka, shooting a 55gr would be far behind these? In the spectrum of rifles, would it be towards the flat shooting end?

Hmmm...not really, but the range of cartridges is massive, so it's a lot flatter shooting than most others by far. Within the spectrum of medium-range varminting cartridges I wouldn't consider it to be particularly flat-shooting.

I've just done some _really_ basic calculations.
I went to Hornady and grabbed some bullet specs for long-range, high-BC bullets in 6.5mm (147gn ELDM), 7mm (180gn ELDM), .308" (230gn ATip)and .338" (285gn ELDM). I'm sure other manufacturers have bullets that would improve on these figures. I hit ADI and determined the most capable standard cartridges for each - .264 WinMag, 7mm RUM, .30-378 Weatherby, and .338-378 Weatherby Mag.

6.5mm 147gn ELDM .697. 264WinMag 3000fps
140mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 300mm low at 400m, 750mm low at 500m, 1400mm low at 600m, 6.75m low at 1000m, 22.35m low at 1500m, 55.5m low at 2000m (wind 8.6m)

7mm 180gn ELDM .796 7mmRUM 3000fps
140mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 280mm low at 400m, 740mm low at 500m, 1380mm low at 600m, 6.3m low at 1000m, 20m low at 1500m, 47.8m low at 2000m (wind 7.2m)

.308" 230gn ATip .823 .30-378 Weatherby 3080fps
125mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 265mm low at 400m, 680mm low at 500m, 1300mm low at 600m, 5.9m low at 1000m, 18.4m low at 1500m, 43.5m low at 2000m (wind 6.6m)

.338" 285gn ELDM .829 .338-378 Weatherby Magnum 2850fps
150mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 315mm low at 400m, 815mm low at 500m, 1525mm low at 600m, 6.9m low at 1000m, 21.85m low at 1500m, 51.7m low at 2000m (wind 7.2m)


For comparison:
.224" 55gn VMax .255 .223Rem 3200fps
170mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 410mm low at 400m, 1190mm low at 500m, 2.5m low at 600m, 16.8m low at 1000m, 60.9m low at 1500m, 190m low at 2000m (wind 24.5m)

Based on that I'd say that .30-378 Weatherby Magnum has to be right near the top of the flattest shooting commercial cartridges.

For some further comparison:
.204" 40gn VMax .275 .204Ruger 3750fps
120mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 270mm low at 400m, 760mm low at 500m, 1550mm low at 600m, 5.9m low at 1000m, 18.4m low at 1500m, 43.5m low at 2000m (wind 6.6m)

.172" 20gn VMax .185 .17Rem 4400fps
100mm high at 160m, 300m zero, 270mm low at 400m, 820mm low at 500m, 1800mm low at 600m, 10.5m low at 1000m, 48.6m low at 1500m, 139m low at 2000m (wind 21.2m)

[bladeracer]

I'm messing with ballistics right now (while watching the Asia Road Race Championship from Suzuka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=821U7NU1UkU)

I need to calculate trajectories for my milsurp loads so I can shoot the Bloke on the Range "competition" I posted in another thread. Calculate, then confirm the curve, then shoot the comp. I want to start with the 6.5x52mm Carcano which has no sight adjustment at all. I think I've got it sorted for a 100m zero, with 500mm and 1000mm holdovers at 200m and 300m (which should be easy as the target is a 1000mm-square board). Was hoping to confirm it today but it's wet and very windy here today.

[xDom]

E93197D6-A516-4730-9A50-A9321C751F4A.jpeg (1.65 MiB) Viewed 4238 times

I’ve got another question unrelated to the previous ones. Hopefully it’s ok to keep it in this thread.
If a bullet passes extremely close to an object on the way to its target, could this interfere with the bullets path after said object?
I’ve got a rough drawing to show you what I mean.