animalpest wrote:Yep, always check your pan tension for sure.
I am off out to the desert tomorrow to do some dog's, foxes, cats and camels.
Die Judicii wrote:I didn't think there would be any ferals left in the Wait Awhile state.
Grandadbushy wrote:AH animalpest i wouldn't worry about a gun or trap, just take a drum of petrol out with you, put a drinking trough out in the open fill it full of petrol and let them all have a good drink then chase them around for awhile until they run out of petrol then you can just go around and pick them up, too easy
Grandadbushy wrote:Jesus DJ run that by me again i couldn't read the post for laughing
animalpest wrote:Yeah looking forward to the 20 odd hours in the saddle. Not.
Grandadbushy wrote:Well animalpest i don't know where you got that info from on 1080 has no pain attached to it's killing effect mate, yet i agree it hits the nerve system so i've been in a ute when a dog ''domestic'' died from 1080 , we used to kill a steer and take it to the airstrip and the vet used to fly in and inject the meat pieces we had cut prior to him arriving we used to put it into bags a bag for each paddock then put them into the cruiser ute one would drive the other would throw the pieces of meat out , being donned in hat, face mask, raincoat and boots all for saftey not to come into contact with the 1080, we would space the pieces of meat out like one every 200yds or so, so after we had done all the paddocks we were going to do we went back to the yards and burnt the stuff the thrower was wearing cleaned the ute or so it was thought there was the tiniest piece the ringers had missed not knowing this we headed back to the homestead i had my dog tied in the back and it was this she found , unbeknown to us she picked it up it wasn't long down the track she started fitting and bloke i can tell you if you say 1080 doesn't give pain then you know nothing of this poison, what me and 2 other ringers witnessed was nothing short of agony , she regurgitated the meat while she was dying, 1080 produces no pain is garbage in the least in my opinion
animalpest wrote:By 20 hrs in the saddle I mean the vehicle seat. According to Google Maps it's 22 hrs 6 min without stopping from home to the nearest point near the job. There is no point taking a chopper if I need boots on the ground to do the work with all the sundry equipment you need. It is not unusual for our vehicles be 3500km from home. Commonly we are 12-16 hours drive from the office on a job. Used to love it but hate it now.
So with multiple vehicles, "3500km from home" + running costs + employee wage/salaries + insurances + permits where applicable, + sustenance + return,,,,
and obviously being the absolute bare minimum in required stores, supplies, and equipment must amount to a considerable outlay.
Surely the pay check must be written by a Sheik ?
To be the other way would be totally beyond the realms of ridiculously cheap.
Just out of curiosity (for myself),, and for future prospective customers,, what is the name of this business/venture/enterprise ???
There has been a lot of research on 1080, including it's humaneness on animals since it was first trialled as a rabbit bait back in 1953 in the southwest of WA. There are also documented cases of accidental poisoning in humans that survived near fatal doses. The late Dr Denis King and others did much research dosing animals to determine how much 1080 it took to kill them. Stuart Wheeler, Laurie Twigg and Peter Thomson did a lot of research on rabbits, foxes, pigs, dingoes, 1080 on native fauna etc from the 1960's onwards. Obviously much was also learnt on the symptoms and other effects when doing these lab and field trials. King's research led to better ways of dosing animals and checking LD50 doses without having to resort to killing them. (King was first to hypothesis that WA native animals evolved a tolerance to 1080)
Dog's, even though they may occasionally have vegetation in their stomach are not ominvores. They are classed as carnivores. While the info from Pestsmart is correct, they refer to research on pain in herbivores and ominvores, but research on carnivores is well documented and published.
How animals die from 1080 is dependent on whether they are carnivores, ominvores or herbivores. It's affect on the body differs. 1080 suppresses the CNS while strychnine is a stimulant.
1080 takes much longer than strychnine because the chemical composition of 1080 needs to change when it enters the body before it can work.
While the effects on animals looks terrible, it's effects on the central nervous system make it look much worse than the animal feels. There no evidence of animals like dog's feeling pain and that is the accepted concensus from researchers, even those in animal welfare.
No evidence for or against so it seems.
Praps you could expand on this to those whom have first hand experience that seemingly denounce that which has been said here.
This is not my feelings on the subject but is based on many peer reviewed research papers.