Oldbloke wrote:Some people simply don't learn.
http://www.sportingshooter.com.au/lates ... 20offences
womble wrote:He’ll learn now. Rangers will seize everything related. There goes his vehicle.
I don’t understand the unlicensed hunter reference though. He’s not using firearms.
rc42 wrote:I suppose that in a way it was considerate of this guy to film his own illegal activities and then post them online for the police to gather up and use against him in court. He's made their job easier, the court case will be shorter and lots of tax $ saved all round.
I don't know why people still think that social media posts are private in any way, even if they are only set as shared with specific people.
For anyone here, if you so make an online post relating to firearms behave as if a copy would be automatically forwarded to your state's weapons licensing section, and that includes this site.
ZaineB wrote:rc42 wrote:it goes further than that, new powers being awarded to federal police and asio will allow them to not only access your online personas and accounts without a warrant, but also allows them to control and edit/manipulate your online profiles, posts, data and so on, social media is a big no no, stay off it, its bad.
rc42 wrote:I suppose that in a way it was considerate of this guy to film his own illegal activities and then post them online for the police to gather up and use against him in court. He's made their job easier, the court case will be shorter and lots of tax $ saved all round.
I don't know why people still think that social media posts are private in any way, even if they are only set as shared with specific people.
For anyone here, if you so make an online post relating to firearms behave as if a copy would be automatically forwarded to your state's weapons licensing section, and that includes this site.
ZaineB wrote:rc42 wrote:I suppose that in a way it was considerate of this guy to film his own illegal activities and then post them online for the police to gather up and use against him in court. He's made their job easier, the court case will be shorter and lots of tax $ saved all round.
I don't know why people still think that social media posts are private in any way, even if they are only set as shared with specific people.
For anyone here, if you so make an online post relating to firearms behave as if a copy would be automatically forwarded to your state's weapons licensing section, and that includes this site.
it goes further than that, new powers being awarded to federal police and asio will allow them to not only access your online personas and accounts without a warrant, but also allows them to control and edit/manipulate your online profiles, posts, data and so on, social media is a big no no, stay off it, its bad.
bladeracer wrote:ZaineB wrote:rc42 wrote:I suppose that in a way it was considerate of this guy to film his own illegal activities and then post them online for the police to gather up and use against him in court. He's made their job easier, the court case will be shorter and lots of tax $ saved all round.
I don't know why people still think that social media posts are private in any way, even if they are only set as shared with specific people.
For anyone here, if you so make an online post relating to firearms behave as if a copy would be automatically forwarded to your state's weapons licensing section, and that includes this site.
it goes further than that, new powers being awarded to federal police and asio will allow them to not only access your online personas and accounts without a warrant, but also allows them to control and edit/manipulate your online profiles, posts, data and so on, social media is a big no no, stay off it, its bad.
Anything you post online anywhere is always liable to unwanted access, assume it is in the public domain or don't put it online, anywhere.
ZaineB wrote:rc42 wrote:I suppose that in a way it was considerate of this guy to film his own illegal activities and then post them online for the police to gather up and use against him in court. He's made their job easier, the court case will be shorter and lots of tax $ saved all round.
I don't know why people still think that social media posts are private in any way, even if they are only set as shared with specific people.
For anyone here, if you so make an online post relating to firearms behave as if a copy would be automatically forwarded to your state's weapons licensing section, and that includes this site.
it goes further than that, new powers being awarded to federal police and asio will allow them to not only access your online personas and accounts without a warrant, but also allows them to control and edit/manipulate your online profiles, posts, data and so on, social media is a big no no, stay off it, its bad.
womble wrote:It's true. I'll link it after work.
They can take over your social media and pretend to be you.
Snuck through legislation just recently.
cz515 wrote:Post up some proof mate
Oldbloke wrote:The link indicates they need a warrant.
"The bill grants the Australian Federal Police and Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission new powers to combat serious crime enabled by anonymising technology using three new warrants: network activity, data disruption and account takeover"
Oldbloke wrote:A lower standard so it does appear to suck.