Rakk wrote:All that blacked out text is very informative

It is indeed.... it tells as what sort of a democracy we live in, where we vote our peers into a role, send 'one of us' to Canberra to 'speak for us' then they get there and tell us its all none of 'our' business what they discuss, and create a bureaucratic great wall of china between us and the behind the scenes everything....
Its not right, but its our fault because we accept it.
These are the corresponding codes commonly used in all FOI releases; reference to FOI Act (Cth)
S22 & S22-1
Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted
This section applies if:
(a) an agency or Minister decides:
(i) to refuse to give access to an exempt document; or
(ii) that to give access to a document would disclose information that would reasonably be regarded as irrelevant to the request for access
[[So, if they decide its not relevant, they can delete it....the only part I consider reasonable deletions are names of staffers who are NOT elected apart from high office holders in the ministries and agencies ]]s47C(1)
Public interest conditional exemptions—deliberative processes
General rule
(1) A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would disclose matter (deliberative matter) in the nature of, or relating to, opinion, advice or recommendation obtained, prepared or recorded, or consultation or deliberation that has taken place, in the course of, or for the purposes of, the deliberative processes involved in the functions of:
(a) an agency; or
(b) a Minister; or
(c) the Government of the Commonwealth; or
(d) the Government of Norfolk Island.
[[ so the reason for the foi request is obviously to get a handle on whats happening behind the scenes.... the opinions, recommendations - but thats all specifically off limits!]]s47E(d)
Public interest conditional exemptions—certain operations of agencies A document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure under this Act would, or could reasonably be expected to, do any of the following:
.
.
(d) have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of an agency.
[[sure... whatever you say]]