by trekin » 10 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Don't know about you fellers, but the more I read, the more I wonder how any sensible, sane and rational person could see this as any less than what it is, that is one person's (the committee chair) attempt to have their anti gun bias views forced upon us as law passed by State and Federal Governments. I mean, shouldn't the recommendations put forward by the "committee", be supported by the majority of the committee making the recommendations??
Recommendation 1
7.16 The committee recommends the Commonwealth government provide funding to allow programs, such as the National Firearms Monitoring Program and the National Firearm Theft Monitoring Program, and reports, such as those in the Firearm Theft in Australia series, to continue on an ongoing basis.
Recommendation 2
7.17 The committee further recommends the Australian Institute of Criminology conduct within three years a review of current data collection and reporting arrangements, with a particular focus on:
the need for more accurate data on firearm thefts, the recovery of stolen firearms and seizures of illegally imported firearms;
the quality and comparability of data provided to Commonwealth agencies by state and territory police; and
greater inter-agency co-operation with regards to data sharing
1.213 The majority of Senators attending the inquiry do not agree with Recommendation 1 and Recommendation 2 of the Chair's report: the AIC should not receive additional funding for further research programs.
Recommendation 3
7.25 The committee recommends that the National Firearms Agreement be updated to implement nationally consistent regulation in the following areas:
firearms, firearm parts and firearm accessories;
ammunition; and
the storage of firearms.
1.214 The majority of Senators attending the inquiry do not agree with Recommendation 3 of the Chair's report: these matters should remain responsibility
for State and Territory governments.
Recommendation 4
7.28 The committee recommends that the Commonwealth government, together with state and territory governments, establish national standards for the security of membership data held by gun clubs.
1.215 The majority of Senators attending the inquiry do not agree with Recommendation 4 of the Chair's report: membership data held by gun clubs should remain a responsibility of State and Territory governments.
Recommendation 7
7.44 The committee recommends that Australian governments investigate the requirement for uniform regulations in all jurisdictions covering the manufacture of 3D printed firearms and firearm parts.
1.216 The majority of Senators attending the inquiry do not agree with Recommendation 7 of the Chair's report: new regulations do not need to be introduced to cover the manufacture of 3D printed firearms and firearm parts at this point in time.
Recommendation 9
7.51 The committee recommends that Australian governments consider committing further funding and resourcing to assist in implementing the preceding recommendations.
1.217The majority of Senators attending the inquiry do not support Recommendation 9 of the Chair's report and instead urge the government to consider funding initiatives that educate the wider public on safe use of firearms.
Now whether or not anyone in Government actually reads the report to the end, and see's the chair's recommendations for what they are, and instead acts upon the recommendations put forward by the majority of the Senators attending the inquiry remains to be seen, but I'm just off to the chemist's to stock up on KY.

Rifle stock and pistol grip reproduction.
"legally obligated to be a victim in this country" I earned every grey hair I have.