Terryrnz wrote:I’m wondering about appearance laws as I have moved here from overseas and am fairly new to Australia laws etc. I know nsw w.a are bad but are these laws enforced in Queensland? I live in Queensland and a few of rifles I’m little worried about now, one being a straight pull AR-15 that was made off a wfa1 action. Doesn’t resemble original gun in the slightest. Others similar, it was pointed out to me on another form now I’m a bit paranoid about it all,
Welcome to QLD.
Based on your description, not quite sure why someone would jump in and say that AR15 are Cat D only, which they are.
But, being based on WFA1 action, having a straight pull action, and not resembling the original firearm in any way, I would think that you will be OK.
There are an untold number of Schmidt Rubin, Ross, Heym, Mannlicher, Merkel, Blaser, and others that are all straight-pull, some of which are military but have no attributes that cause their appearance to be "one of those horrible black guns!"
Yes, Qld. does have appearance covered, but the Regulation would appear (sorry about the pun) to leave you in the clear.
Weapons Categories Regulation 1997
5 Category D weapons
(1) Each of the following is a category D weapon—
(a) a self-loading centre-fire rifle designed or adapted for military purposes or a firearm that substantially duplicates a rifle of that type in design, function
or appearance;
QPOL Weapons Licencing Branch
should be able to answer any query, but don't try phoning them on a Wednesday.
Good luck.