Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Questions about Queensland gun and ammunition laws. QLD Weapons Act 1990.

Re: Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Post by bigrich » 23 Oct 2019, 3:52 pm

Burntbear wrote:The irony of the situation is that they published this on the same day that the rest of the Lamestream media was protesting censorship and withholding information.


their worse than the pollies i reckon, the media are banging on about peoples "right to know" , but they twist the facts and only tell half the story all the time.

hippocrites . you know what i mean ;)
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4518
Queensland

Re: Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Post by rc42 » 27 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm

QLD Government has very clear policies about social media posts (which would include YouTube videos) for all employees and contractors. As citizens people are entitled to any opinion that a free society allows (with limits of hate speech, etc.) but can't mention where they work or present any opinion and imply it is official or anything other than their own.
For example, like all of us, Ozzie can criticize politicians and the current laws and the behavior of the main lobby groups on the opposing sides of gun laws but would have to be ultra careful about any comment about the way that the police are creating policies based on the laws and how they are acting other than through very general observation of facts that are already public domain. He also can't mention any connection that he has to the police or any government department.

As far as I can see he has followed the rules and notified superiors and obtained the necessary permissions in advance, he shouldn't have anything to be concerned about unless there is actual content in one of his videos in dispute. Clearly there isn't, just some left wing bs along the lines of "how dare you disagree with us and have so many people taking notice of you, we have to stop you"
rc42
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 795
Queensland

Re: Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Post by landyvlad » 28 Oct 2019, 11:05 am

xDom wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if QLD POL tell him he needs to pull the pin on his reviews. I know cops have restrictions on outside work they can do.
Even though Ozzie went through all the processes to allow him to run his blog in the first place, I can see the Police Force not wanting any controversy.
They please a greater number of people by being PC and telling him to put an end to it.


Telling him to stop on what basis ?
I didn't know he was or is a public servant?
landyvlad
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 7
Queensland

Re: Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Post by wanneroo » 28 Oct 2019, 3:14 pm

As far as I ever knew until he was doxxed, he's a farmer. He never gave any inkling in any videos or social media posts he's got anything to do with the police.
wanneroo
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1419
United States of America

Re: Ozzie Reviews gets a mention.

Post by Ricochet » 29 Oct 2019, 7:36 am

Well if Ozzie wants to take a swipe at them all he has to do is lawyer up, open a go fund me and line up his sponsors for a little legal sponsoring. We'd all contribute to have GCA and one or two of the anti's put in their place.

Kick a dog a few times and it will cower. Kick a dog all the time and eventually it will turn around and rip your leg off.
Ricochet
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 112
New South Wales


Back to top
 
Return to Queensland gun laws