Point223 wrote:Why the f$%# would anyone want to carry in their backyard unless you live on a property and trying to shoot animals.
Birds were eating his plants....
Point223 wrote:Why the f$%# would anyone want to carry in their backyard unless you live on a property and trying to shoot animals.
Point223 wrote:If you're living in suburbia you have no business shooting birds. If you live out in the country go for your life.
Point223 wrote:If you're living in suburbia you have no business shooting birds. If you live out in the country go for your life.
Oldbloke wrote:If I grab an empty rifle in the back yard and dry fire it or just look through the scope to check it out and a sticky nosed neigbour sees me and calls 000. What am I guilty of?
Oldbloke wrote:If I grab an empty rifle in the back yard and dry fire it or just look through the scope to check it out and a sticky nosed neigbour sees me and calls 000. What am I guilty of?
Lorgar wrote:Oldbloke wrote:If I grab an empty rifle in the back yard and dry fire it or just look through the scope to check it out and a sticky nosed neigbour sees me and calls 000. What am I guilty of?
I know we're both in Victoria it's taboo to quote laws from other states but FYI, this is for WA.
"custody of a firearm in a public place" and "discharging a firearm in a public place" are both criminal charges in WA according to the Australian Institute of Criminology publish Court outcomes for firearm offences in Australia.
"being armed in a way that may cause fear" and "causing fear or alarm to driver of conveyance or others" are both in the Criminal Code Act of WA.
From their side arguably none of which require you to have threatened or attempted harm upon another person.
I share this as I already had the information handy from another post.
If I recall correctly there are equivalents of the "custody of a firearm in a public place" charge and "being armed in a way that may cause fear" in Victoria but I can't remember if it's covered in the firearms act or crimes act.
Don't have all day to research for you so just posting what I already had
1290 wrote:In Victoria (I've posted this a few times) under the firearms Act, its an offence to possess a LOADED firearm in public places... with the clear inference being that an UNLOADED firearm is all good
.... may I repeat; under the FA
rainwalker wrote:1290 wrote:In Victoria (I've posted this a few times) under the firearms Act, its an offence to possess a LOADED firearm in public places... with the clear inference being that an UNLOADED firearm is all good
.... may I repeat; under the FA
Not disputing the Firearms act there, but I wonder if they wouldn't get you for some 'disturbing the peace' kind of charge of someone complained?
anthillinside wrote:Although I understand it, I still look in disbelief of were we are and were we are heading and hope for change that is unlikely to happen.
Point223 wrote:Same thing with firearms. And don't be telling me "how we should raise awareness about how nice we are" and how "everyone should notice and recognize us as LAFO, etc" if we are we wouldn't be in the backyard with a gun unless we plan to use it. That's a load of BS.
Point223 wrote:Live by common sense? Yours or mine? An honour killer's common sense is to kill his daughter if she has extra marital sex. A westerner couldn't care less who or how she has sex.
What I'm saying is that there has to be a laws. Our laws are up the ass that's true, nonsensical at times true as well. But there must be a law and that's the difference between a civilized state and savagry.
Point223 wrote:Yes and No. Yes the law is as ****** complicated as my wife. No because the law cannot be stagnant. It must be fluid and adpative in order to be updated to keep up with changes.