AusTac wrote:I heard this morning they are lowering the number amount of firearms it takes to cope a trafficing charge
Wasnt that what the feds had done?? If you're found with 3 unregistered firearms OVER a 12 month period, or something like that....I'll have to search out the bill again...
As I recall, if caught with 3 or the period your put away for X years.... and/or no doubt faced with a penalty of up to something stupendous like $150,000...
I'm all for stopping crime (its certainly not a gun crime wave), but honestly I have an issue with ridiculous penalties for possessing inanimate object, and not injuring anyone.....when I have no doubt there are many situations across the nation where properties have 1 2 or even 3 old firearms that possibly no one even remembered there grand dad or dad put them there when they last used them in 1976..or whenever... yes, they are now 'illegal' guns, are by the convenient definition 'grey market' guns..... but now the next generation who run the farm, or the next owner of the property... is elevated to the highest status of criminal in the land.... No. I dont like it.
Trafficking is moving a large quantity, one or more crates, as an illicit operation for obvious criminal or financial reasons... NOT to create a media release and 5 second audio grab to demonstrate the Government are doing something to prevent a drive-by at 4:00am.....
What annoys me more is that we are always hearing about rape and assault penalties resembling a slap on the wrist, while hearing about heavier penalties for innocuous firearm offences...
While on the other hand..... the grabtards, represented by the greens in parliament, always call for lighter drug penalties, legalised drug - but stricter firearm, ban firearms...