juststarting wrote:I think this may have been covered, but an interesting observation... I purchased primers the other day and the shop recorded my licence details. Same shop, buying powder, same story. I was told that they have to now. However, between then and now, I purchased powder at a different store - no details recorded. Also, no details recorded buying .22 ammo. I was told, primers and powder - it is now a requirement, but not factory ammo.
Feels weird.
bladeracer wrote:Maybe trying to see how much we're stockpiling?
happyhunter wrote:bladeracer wrote:Maybe trying to see how much we're stockpiling?
The Victoria police pushed for the law because they claimed a small number of licensed owners were providing hand loaded ammunition to criminals. I don't know if they had any proof of this.
happyhunter wrote:The Victoria police pushed for the law because they claimed a small number of licensed owners were providing hand loaded ammunition to criminals. I don't know if they had any proof of this.
happyhunter wrote:bladeracer wrote:Maybe trying to see how much we're stockpiling?
The Victoria police pushed for the law because they claimed a small number of licensed owners were providing hand loaded ammunition to criminals. I don't know if they had any proof of this.
happyhunter wrote:bladeracer wrote:Maybe trying to see how much we're stockpiling?
The Victoria police pushed for the law because they claimed a small number of licensed owners were providing hand loaded ammunition to criminals. I don't know if they had any proof of this.
brett1868 wrote:Now the really stupid part of this legislation....I cannot purchase pistol ammunition without showing the registration of a pistol that uses that ammo. However and this is the stupid bit, there is no law in place preventing me from buying the cases, powder, projectiles and primers to make my own. Anyone with a Cat A license can produce pistol ammunition though its only once the components are assembled that it becomes illegal for them to possess.
wade06 wrote:Yeah, it is strange.
It is also strange that I can buy ammo of a different caliber to a gun that i own.
Its a wonder there isn't an online check that requires the LGS enters my licence number and I am only allowed to buy ammo for calibers that I own.
Likewise with reloading projectiles and cases.
Not that i'm proposing it should happen.
What I find funny is for "pistol" ammo in NSW I can't buy 9mm without owning it, but if Brett gives me 9mm that's ok! I can keep that in my safe...
brett1868 wrote:Cat A & B holders can possess any ammo they like even if they don't have a rifle registered to them in that chambering because they can borrow / lend rifles.
brett1868 wrote:Cat A & B holders can possess any ammo they like even if they don't have a rifle registered to them in that chambering because they can borrow / lend rifles.
brett1868 wrote:What I find funny is for "pistol" ammo in NSW I can't buy 9mm without owning it, but if Brett gives me 9mm that's ok! I can keep that in my safe...
Not sure about having possession of pistol ammo without having a pistol of that cal registered in your name. The confusing part would be that if I lend you a 9mm then I have to also supply you the ammo as you shouldn't be able to buy it. Cat A & B holders can possess any ammo they like even if they don't have a rifle registered to them in that chambering because they can borrow / lend rifles.
wade06 wrote:Its a wonder this loophole hasn't been closed in all states.
brett1868 wrote:What I find funny is for "pistol" ammo in NSW I can't buy 9mm without owning it, but if Brett gives me 9mm that's ok! I can keep that in my safe...
Not sure about having possession of pistol ammo without having a pistol of that cal registered in your name. The confusing part would be that if I lend you a 9mm then I have to also supply you the ammo as you shouldn't be able to buy it. Cat A & B holders can possess any ammo they like even if they don't have a rifle registered to them in that chambering because they can borrow / lend rifles.
doc wrote:I would imagine pistols can be loaned, or ammo used at the range in someone else's pistol - just like any other firearm law?
Those rules requiring you to produce evidence you own such a gun is ridiculous. You only require a license of that category to be able to shoot one (regardless of who's name it's in).
Case example: My wife holds a guns licenses, and uses my firearms but yet has no firearm in her own name. Does this mean in WA she wouldn't be allowed to pick up ammo from down the street - even though she's licensed and uses my firearms?
Just another law that needs to be included in this 'review' I think!