bumpy1976 wrote:I have been cruising around this forum for a little while now and have asked a few questions and have gotten some solid advice, as to the direction i wish to take as far as a firearm owner and thank you for being supportive of someone who is getting involved.
I have sat back, watched and listened toto what's happening in WA and in QLD, and i ask myself, Is S.A next???
Are they going to take my right to own a particular firearm, that is in my category of licence?
Are they then, going to restrict these laws even further?
Are they then going to make it extremely difficult to keep my firearms, and my licence, due to severe restrictions placed upon firearm owners?
To which, my answer would be YES. I base this on the fact that since 1996, our governments have been relentlessly trying to disarm everyone they possibly can. They first took the semi auto away, after Port Arthur, and even back then, as a non-shooter, i didn't agree with their actions, and my position hasn't changed, and it has rolled on since then.
My thought process, to me seems very simple. Firearms don't kill people, people kill people. Firearms are unable to kill without someone pulling the trigger, (or some sort of malfunction) So therefore, the issues are not the firearms, it's all about controlling the minority groups, and use fear mongering to drive their agenda of creating a safe environment.
I have watched a few YouTube videos on the current state of affairs, by Ozzie Reviews TopherField, and lastly Mark and Sam Afterwork. I watched Mark's recent video about gun ban fightback, and he raises a very strong argument, and recommend everyone, regardless of what sort of firearm you prefer/own, please go watch it on YouTube, here is the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Vyl7SeRnww
As a prospective new firearm owner, I'm far from anything political, my intellect just isn't up there, but I go by what I see (as in actions), and by what i hear, and read. I follow the SU and the SSAA on social media, and the SU have been very vocal about the current situations, and as for the SSAA, i hear crickets.... Nothing..... Which to me, is a concern.
Which brings me to the point that Mark has raised, in the above video link. Why can't the firearm owners of the whole of Australia, unite under one group, and shooters, helping shooters, to stem the onslaught of Government changes, that will eventually impact on EVERY SINGLE LAW-ABIDING FIREARM OWNER... I firmly believe, they will try to ban firearms completely out of the community, and as a community of law-abiding firearm owners, we owe it, to one another, to fight for our rights/freedoms to stop our rights/freedoms being further eroded. United we stand, divided we fall....
THEY WANT YOUR GUNS, OUR GUNS.
Sorry for this long-winded rant/ read, but i had to get my thoughts out of my head. This is simply my view, and you may think I'm way off base, but i see it happening, if nothing is done to stop it.
mchughcb wrote:There are many people that blame Mark and Sam afterwork for what has happened in WA. To the point that if you post a comment like that in his youtube channel you will get banned. Police are paranoid that people have rifles that shoot further than their glocks because they are paranoid. Regularly shooting at targets 3km away and posting it really upset them or so I heard.
Fester wrote:mchughcb wrote:There are many people that blame Mark and Sam afterwork for what has happened in WA. To the point that if you post a comment like that in his youtube channel you will get banned. Police are paranoid that people have rifles that shoot further than their glocks because they are paranoid. Regularly shooting at targets 3km away and posting it really upset them or so I heard.
I reckon that's just shooters blaming each other and they will do it till the cows come home.
When the latest attacks started, I had a slight hope that shooters might get together but no, I just heard old range RO Fudds complaining about hunters and ridiculous statements about the punters.
Bad arrogant police bosses would have just gone for Mark's license IMO if he scared them.
mchughcb wrote:Fester wrote:mchughcb wrote:There are many people that blame Mark and Sam afterwork for what has happened in WA. To the point that if you post a comment like that in his youtube channel you will get banned. Police are paranoid that people have rifles that shoot further than their glocks because they are paranoid. Regularly shooting at targets 3km away and posting it really upset them or so I heard.
I reckon that's just shooters blaming each other and they will do it till the cows come home.
When the latest attacks started, I had a slight hope that shooters might get together but no, I just heard old range RO Fudds complaining about hunters and ridiculous statements about the punters.
Bad arrogant police bosses would have just gone for Mark's license IMO if he scared them.
Old range RO Fudds complaining about hunters.
Must be a global thing. Fudds or Karen's.
Wapiti wrote:Look up One Nation's firearms policy. They believe in less restrictions for the law-abiding citizens and more action against offenders who use firearms in crime. Not the good people. And plans to attempt to wind back some silly restrictions.
Having had a fair bit of personal interaction with certain members of One Nation including the leader and campaign director and knowing they will not support anymore laws or restrictions and that they want more emphasis put on police for not doing their jobs, I don't understand why they aren't alternatives to people.
For those saying that they vote for the big picture not just guns, OK, well look at their policies on immigration, economic reforms, energy generation, anything else driving you all to be penniless and restricted. Tell me the policies aren't what you want.
There are alternatives, the problem is that people vote for or even against, a party because they either don't like the voice of the leader or fall for media assassinations, so it's no wonder the worst possible alternatives are who they vote for - and then suffer.
Wapiti wrote:Look up One Nation's firearms policy. They believe in less restrictions for the law-abiding citizens and more action against offenders who use firearms in crime. Not the good people. And plans to attempt to wind back some silly restrictions.
Having had a fair bit of personal interaction with certain members of One Nation including the leader and campaign director and knowing they will not support anymore laws or restrictions and that they want more emphasis put on police for not doing their jobs, I don't understand why they aren't alternatives to people.
For those saying that they vote for the big picture not just guns, OK, well look at their policies on immigration, economic reforms, energy generation, anything else driving you all to be penniless and restricted. Tell me the policies aren't what you want.
There are alternatives, the problem is that people vote for or even against, a party because they either don't like the voice of the leader or fall for media assassinations, so it's no wonder the worst possible alternatives are who they vote for - and then suffer.
Fester wrote:Greens last, then Elbo, then the potato.
Up at the top is One Nation, SFFP, and whoever can cause the majors more damage, more chance of getting in, depending on the area.
Katter, the re-named LDP, even Goose Palmer.
Even the pot smokers party are gun friendly unless it's just like a Liberal election promise to be reversed if elected.
One report I heard said about 30% of Aussies didn't vote for the majors in the last election, so it could be 40% and change has started. It will take a few more elections, but the hard old far-right conservatives will be dying off and the kids will see the woke left just lied and didn't really help them.
If someone started a party for normal Aussies, like Pauline, but smarter, we could end up back into a democracy.
Oldbloke wrote:Fester wrote:Greens last, then Elbo, then the potato.
Up at the top is One Nation, SFFP, and whoever can cause the majors more damage, more chance of getting in, depending on the area.
Katter, the re-named LDP, even Goose Palmer.
Even the pot smokers party are gun friendly unless it's just like a Liberal election promise to be reversed if elected.
One report I heard said about 30% of Aussies didn't vote for the majors in the last election, so it could be 40% and change has started. It will take a few more elections, but the hard old far-right conservatives will be dying off and the kids will see the woke left just lied and didn't really help them.
If someone started a party for normal Aussies, like Pauline, but smarter, we could end up back into a democracy.
This is how I've voted (with some variation) for at least last 5 elections.
The majors incompetence have forced me to do it.
For shooters it's the senate where we need to put SFFP, Katter, one nation (God help me) first.
In some electorates, like mine, the house of reps is so safe wouldn't matter what you vote for.
But if your in a close seat your vote could be critical.
bigrich wrote:for years i've been putting auntie pauline first , the kat in the hat second or SFFP , greens last , labor second last , libs before that . i reckon if the nats were still a stand alone party they'd have interesting policy.