A few weeks ago, in a thread I can no longer find, someone put up a link to a youtube video by Ian McCollum featuring the Vickers machinegun which attracted the usual lauditory comments from the usual suspects.
The claim made was that the British army fired 5000000 rounds in 7 days and the machine gun did not show any appreciable wear at the end of the test.
I was curious so I read a few articles on the vickers.
The rate of fire of a vickers is from 450 to 500 rounds per minute so firing 5000000 rounds in 7 days would work out to be 496 rounds per minute.
That's at the upper end of the Vickers capability but on the face of it quite feasible.
Now comes the skepticism.
What about belt changes?
Ammo came in 250 round belts. That means 20000 belts would have been used, requiring 19999 belt reinsertions so with each taking on average 5 seconds that means 27 hours 46 minutes was spent reinserting belts.
What about barrel changes?
Barrels were changed every 15000 rounds meaning 333 barrels were used so there were 332 barrel changes. Each change would take 5 minutes or more so total time spent changing barrels was at least 27 hours 40 minutes.
Given those numbers the reality is that 5000000 rounds would have taken 9 days 7 hours 26 minutes.
Put another way the likely true round count for 7 days thus could have been a still impressive 3760000 but that isn't 5000000.
By the way, the Vickers used by McCollum in the video was doing nowhere near 496 rounds per minute. My impression was closer to 300 rounds per minute.
I am a little disappointed Ian McCollum was so gullible.
The morals of the story
1. Never let facts get in the way of a good story
2. People will readily believe what they want to believe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSG2Flnc1Rs