Broad arrow cafe bullet

[alexjones]

He used the ar15 in the cafe. Then the fn fal outside the cafe, in the bus stop area, the toll booth area and the petrol station. It was found on the roof of the granny flat at seascape.

He also used sks rifles that were inside seascape to shoot at police.

This is the offical narrative but we were not there and have not seen the evidence.

The odd thing about the ar15 was that the breech had been blown out by a hot load NOT by the fire. The stock of the rifle burnt from the fire.

I don’t think he used the slr until the siege. Because it was at that property. Not his. He reloaded the ar15 before exiting the cafe.

No it was not a lithgow slr it was a Belgian FN fal and it was used everywhere except the cafe and was left on the roof at seascape. If you read the police interview Martin admits to owning the ar15 but not the FN. He said he never seen it before.

[alexjones]

The main thing that’s irritating me is this is someone who’s had considerable training. And the police realise that early on. They’re not going anywhere near him. They just don’t. The sog don’t. They hole up and wait for him to come out.
And they know the hostages are long dead. They know it.

He talked to them for hours but all that’s released is a tiny snippet early on and even from that it’s obvious.
Because they’ve figured out he killed them all and they don’t go in. Not for lack of trying. They just can’t get to him.

Because he has them all pinned down and they can’t see him. He’s not firing from the house. Or not only firing from the house.
This is at night time and this bloke knows what he’s doing. He’s a scary operator and he has them all contained on all sides.

They are negotiating with someone in the house on the landline, but they’re being fired on from somewhere else at the same time.
And this has them completely bewildered.

He’s literally saying he can see one of the sog and fires on them while he’s on the landline . And not from a window in the house.
You can out manoeuvre one person. If you’ve got two people that’s exponentially more difficult.

This is not his (or their) first rodeo. And he (or they) are very proficient with military weapons. And he (or they) know how to counter sog strategy.

I think they burnt him out in the end. They torched the joint somehow. Ran out of options.

IQ of 66
bulls**t

Considerable training? Every victim in the cafe and gift shop were killed point blank, at the buses all were shot within 15 yards, the Mikacs point blank, at the exit point blank whenever he shot over 50 yards he missed most and wounded 3. He had considerable experience shooting animals & people with an air rifle when he was younger ( the inability of his Father to stop this and the strain of dealing with Police after such events was a contributing factor to his suicide). He was mentally competent enough to hold a Passport and travel Internationally on his own, as well as obtain a Drivers Licence, this whole garbage about his IQ being too low to do things is crud. Talk to those, as I have, who spent years guarding him in Risdon and you get a better idea of the actual rat cunning, devious perverted manipulating raping dog he is.

You are wrong about the part about the drivers licence. He never had one. Read his prison interview where he says he was scared to be pulled over because he never had a licence.

[alexjones]

The shooting was not that spectacular nearly all victims were shoot at point blank range with many frozen in fear not even moving. When he walked out of the cafe and changed from the ar15 to the fn fal and was taking some longer shots at people he did not hit anyone. 6 bodies were stacked on top of each other like firewood trying to escape through the emergency fire door in the gift shop that had been sealed shut a few weeks earlier.

According to witnesses the shooter did have the foresight to reload on the 29th round whilst he reloaded his magazine. Keeping the 30th round in the chamber incase someone tried to jump him. This does show firearm proficiency or perhaps it was just blind luck

[alexjones]

The ar15 and ak are the easiest operating systems of any rifle in my opinion. They just work with very little knowledge required. Insert magazine, cock, remove safety, shoot. The gun will work.

[womble]

I don’t dispute what he did in the cafe. Fish in a barrel. Rear exit sealed.
If you were so unfortunate to view Tarrant’s live stream before it was taken down then you’d realise that rifle in that situation a monkey could do it. Illegal to view now beware.
I copped it by accident marked as a news report live at the scene on YouTube.

Yes it’s a very intuitive rifle. By design and intentionally. You want the dumbest jar head to operate it under stress. That’s it’s purpose.

The conspiracy theories are so outlandish and pervasive they muddy what information I can consider true.

Nothing Martin says in interviews can be taken as true.

You have to unlearn so much you’ve heard or read to look at it with a fresh set of eyes.

My issue is I don’t believe Martin acted alone. Never thought I’d say that. I’m actually fairly certain I know who his sidekick was now too. But obviously I can’t say it.

Martin’s body language and gait, stride, around the cafe is an individual it a state of rage, mania. That’s quite distinctive if you’ve seen it before. Been so unfortunate as to witness before.
People in this state believe they are capable of anything. That’s their reality.
And i credit his body count inside the cafe to that. In many ways it mirrors a disciplined trained killer. There’s no hesitation and it’s precise and direct. It’s robotic. There’s no emotional connection to his function.

I’m looking for information now on the shotgun victim who survived. American tourist. And that’s really well buried.

Why does all this matter.
He’s the most influential person in our nation’s history. Which is truly horrible.
He altered our future. With the aid of a prime minister so devout he took it apon himself to play God.
From this point forward we decided who lives and who dies in a violent confrontation with murderous intent.

As an example. We have a list of women today who are fleeing or hiding from an ex partner who intends to kill them.
We know who they are and we know they are going to be murdered.
Everyone knows including the police.
So we can tell you specifically by name who is going to be murdered tomorrow or next week or month. A violent death. Possibility burned alive.
And we won’t help them. We won’t save them. We won’t permit them the technology they need to survive. She is permitted a mobile phone and nothing more.
If she fights back and survives we will punish her and make an example of her.

I don’t believe that’s our choice to make.

We deserve to know why this burden was put on us. Every detail. It’s all we have to justify our own inhumanity.

And they decide to hide it from us for another 75 years. No freedom of information. No government transparency.