Ziege wrote:forget it mick, he is a complete retard, its not worth the effort.
If he didnt attribute arguments to people they didnt make, he would probably make more sense.
Ziege wrote:forget it mick, he is a complete retard, its not worth the effort.
Ziege wrote:I will never support the death penalty, plenty of slave labour they could be doing instead.
Ziege wrote:This is why they offend, they have a positive association with that sexual act in the same way that a healthy person has with patting their best 4 legged mate on the head after playing fetch, or having their nana give them a big warm hug. This stuff isnt clear cut, and sadly none of our mental health system or society is properly setup or orientated to actually stop the abuse, Victims of grooming often get a bout of counselling at the beginning and are then left with all that unresolved positive association for the rest of their lives, and that's only the people who are identified as victims and are helped.
Ziege wrote:Its a very difficult topic, make no mistake if someone touched my kids god help them
Ziege wrote: but the system needs to be made to actually deal with the issue. Only solution is reformation of society to actually address and extinguish it, this unfortunately falls into the individual hands of the collective to be proactive in how they raise their children from hereon out. and cant be solved my malice alone.
Ziege wrote:parents tune in, if your child is abused you are their custodian, take responsibility for your neglect to educate yourself on the signs of abuse and your lack of vigilance. in a lot of things discernment is learned. learn it.
also never raise your children in an environment with little or no boundaries, you are asking for disaster, whether its this issue or others, you will have been entirely responsible for that environment.
Ziege wrote: fear of reprisal is the biggest road block to stopping the abuse, the only fix is to reprogram and give the right tools to change those associations, so whilst the old pedo who has a list as long as his arm deserves contempt, a kid or young adult who is not an offender but a victim and living in their own personal hell isnt.
Flyer wrote:I'm not getting into a dissecting argument. It's messy and boring.
And no matter how many different ways you frame the same argument, if it doesn't hold water, it doesn't hold water. That is very different to not understading what you are saying: I understand, but I see no evidence.
What I will point out is, it doesn't really matter what your argument is, because it won't change anything: society has moved on and we are not going back to the "good old days" – whatever you think they were.How often do you hear older – and especially conservative – people opining that things were worse in their time? Almost never. It was always better. Generation after generation all say the same thing.
People don't "behave less well today" – they simply behave differently.
You are out of synch if you believe those days were "better".
Indeed, you still haven't put forth a good argument as to why today's legal system is a "total fail".
We have more police, because we have a larger population
We have more people in prisons, because we lock up more non-violent drug offenders.
We have laws in place now that were not in place even 20 years ago.
You views are subjective and you don't provide the facts to back them up. That's not a strawman argument, it's pointing out the obvious.
mickb wrote:I said the crime rate was roughly the same, but with less police needed and the prisons half as full.
And again, when people were freer to correct others behaviour we had a system that worked better.
Thats not debatable, the statistics today, the incarceration rate and the police expenditure is disgraceful and a total fail.
it just didnt work. people behave less well these days. You can recruit all the scarecrows and side tangents you want.
Ziege wrote:parents tune in, if your child is abused you are their custodian, take responsibility for your neglect to educate yourself on the signs of abuse and your lack of vigilance. in a lot of things discernment is learned. learn it.
also never raise your children in an environment with little or no boundaries, you are asking for disaster, whether its this issue or others, you will have been entirely responsible for that environment.
TassieTiger wrote:Ziege wrote:parents tune in, if your child is abused you are their custodian, take responsibility for your neglect to educate yourself on the signs of abuse and your lack of vigilance. in a lot of things discernment is learned. learn it.
also never raise your children in an environment with little or no boundaries, you are asking for disaster, whether its this issue or others, you will have been entirely responsible for that environment.
This a side issue to the topic - but from personal experience, this is frustratingly impossible to do for millions of dads around this country (and a few mums), where magistrates have ostracised the dads out of the family environment based on bulldust AVO’s and a bulls**t application of child support policies.
My lawyer from many years ago, said it’s well known in the industry that between 25-35% of FV orders are based on falsehood where the “driver” is money via Csa or simply wanting to “get back at dad”.
And this then opens a huge can of worms...
TassieTiger wrote:Ziege wrote:parents tune in, if your child is abused you are their custodian, take responsibility for your neglect to educate yourself on the signs of abuse and your lack of vigilance. in a lot of things discernment is learned. learn it.
also never raise your children in an environment with little or no boundaries, you are asking for disaster, whether its this issue or others, you will have been entirely responsible for that environment.
This a side issue to the topic - but from personal experience, this is frustratingly impossible to do for millions of dads around this country (and a few mums), where magistrates have ostracised the dads out of the family environment based on bulldust AVO’s and a bulls**t application of child support policies.
My lawyer from many years ago, said it’s well known in the industry that between 25-35% of FV orders are based on falsehood where the “driver” is money via Csa or simply wanting to “get back at dad”.
And this then opens a huge can of worms...