That's very interesting.
Thanks for that Baron.
Would you agree that that's possibly why someone like Mr Rush, who would be well aware of all of he above, refused to allow his admittedly experimental hull design to be classed, rated and certified?
straightshooter wrote:Who could have possibly anticipated that 'risk taking' actually carries risks?
Billo wrote:26 min video shot only days before that pretty much shows that this contraption really did have a few issues, skip to the 11 min mark to see what happened on the 3rd mission. Scary stuff but this thing wasnt sea worthy
https://youtu.be/O-8U08yJlb8
womble wrote:Agree .
5 days ago I couldn’t even spell submarine. The limit of my knowledge was a song by the Beatles .
Yet still I wouldn’t hop in that POS and believe for a second it could dive 4km under water.
Today I am one of the world’s leading experts on building submarines and can say with confidence I was right.
Lazarus wrote:That's very interesting.
Thanks for that Baron.
Would you agree that that's possibly why someone like Mr Rush, who would be well aware of all of he above, refused to allow his admittedly experimental hull design to be classed, rated and certified?
straightshooter wrote:Who could have possibly anticipated that 'risk taking' actually carries risks?