JSS wrote:JimTom wrote:Another ex PM pension for us to pay now.
Pity it isn’t means tested like they do to our oldies. They work hard all of their lives to get a few assets together then get penalised. Ex Pollies on the gravy train for life. Two sets of rules.
Those pieces of sh1t make me sick to the stomach.
I used to scuba dive with a girl who worked under the umbrella of the Gov Gens Dept, she was part of the team who handled security for visiting pollies & dippo's and for our pollies both current & retired.
You would not believe the money they spend on retired PMs security, and that's on top of their retirement package. They cost us a fortune until the day they (and their partner dies).
So that package had to be put together and paid for once after 11 years of serving as pm for John Howard (for example). How many times has it had to be put together and paid for with these wankers over the past decade.
The sad thing is we sit here an bitch about what a bunch of self serving pieces of s**t they all are just like others are bitching elsewhere i'm sure, but then come election time the mass populous will baa like sheep and vote one of the big two back in again.
JSS wrote:JimTom wrote:Another ex PM pension for us to pay now.
Pity it isn’t means tested like they do to our oldies. They work hard all of their lives to get a few assets together then get penalised. Ex Pollies on the gravy train for life. Two sets of rules.
Those pieces of sh1t make me sick to the stomach.
I used to scuba dive with a girl who worked under the umbrella of the Gov Gens Dept, she was part of the team who handled security for visiting pollies & dippo's and for our pollies both current & retired.
You would not believe the money they spend on retired PMs security, and that's on top of their retirement package. They cost us a fortune until the day they (and their partner dies).
So that package had to be put together and paid for once after 11 years of serving as pm for John Howard (for example). How many times has it had to be put together and paid for with these wankers over the past decade.
The sad thing is we sit here an bitch about what a bunch of self serving pieces of s**t they all are just like others are bitching elsewhere i'm sure, but then come election time the mass populous will baa like sheep and vote one of the big two back in again.
Oldbloke wrote:I’ve said it for god knows how many years VOTE FOR INDEPENDENTS. THEY LOOK AFTER THEIR ELECTORATE.
bigfellascott wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I’ve said it for god knows how many years VOTE FOR INDEPENDENTS. THEY LOOK AFTER THEIR ELECTORATE.
I'm not sure their up to running the country though sadly we've been sucked into thinking it's a Duopoly when it comes to the political system and who should be able to run the country. Clearly, they are both out of good ideas so we definitely need a new direction and I'm not convinced the other options are really up to the job but I guess there's only one way to really find out for sure and that's give em a go.
Ziad wrote:Bah humbug.
The reason nothing has happened after Howard and all these infighting is cuz of the rise of FB and blue independent. So a bunch of loonies get voted in all wanting things completely opposite to each other and nothing really gets done by the main parties. Then ya'll complain that the drongos don't do anything and we need to vote more loonies in (not all small parties and independents are loonies)
Just think about it for a second.. whether you liked john or not he was the last of the lot that actually got things done..... after that rise of weekly polls and swing voters voting independents and minor parties had caused nothing but issues.
This is something that I just came up with 2 days ago... to me it makes sense
Oldbloke wrote:bigfellascott wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I’ve said it for god knows how many years VOTE FOR INDEPENDENTS. THEY LOOK AFTER THEIR ELECTORATE.
I'm not sure their up to running the country though sadly we've been sucked into thinking it's a Duopoly when it comes to the political system and who should be able to run the country. Clearly, they are both out of good ideas so we definitely need a new direction and I'm not convinced the other options are really up to the job but I guess there's only one way to really find out for sure and that's give em a go.
Yep not sure what would happen if there were no parties. What we need is about 30% independents. People who are real people rather than uni students and caree politicians. Like Ricky Muir. A real person with normal job and lives in rural area not hawthorn or Toorak with 10 ml in the bank and owns 5 appartment blocks. Oh and actually pays som tax
Ziad wrote:The invisible hand of mod..... poof and he's gone.
Ziad wrote:So the (turn)bull's turn finally came to an end. Peter (dutton) the pied piper was feeling very happy with himself. But as Confucius says, movie star power always wins. So all the politicians are screaming, beam me up scotty (morrison) because we want to goto a bbq and put a (josh) fried(burg) shrimp on the barbie.
All in all the bill 2wd rubbing his hands as his odds just shorten to become the leader of the bunch of holes
darwindingo wrote:Oldbloke wrote:+1 bigfellascott. But they should have used one of these.
Lol
Here OB, a more modern version of what you suggest
Honestly this should really be mandatory for all of them.. They are all so full of ****** they would make for good fertiliser, thats really the only way any of them could ever even hope to be at all useful
Stix wrote:Ah...saw the title of this thread & thought it was another one about bentaz...
Stix wrote:Ah...saw the title of this thread & thought it was another one about bentaz...