Well, as the topic subject says,,
Considering all that we do to obtain and maintain a firearms license, and that it is an official license which is recognized almost nationally,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (I think all Australian states and territories have reciprocal rights with the exception of the "Wait Awhile" state) that only recognizes its own license.
Why is it that if asked for photo ID a "Firearms Licence" just isn't good enough,, unless it is specifically used in conjunction with firearms.
If general ID is asked for, It won't be accepted.
The "Drivers Licence" bullsh!t gets right up my nose.
I tried to use my firearms licence as ID and ?proof of age, today simply to get into a licensed venue for a meal, and it was refused.
Why,,,,,,,, for f*ck sake ??
It's not only photo ID of who I am, but it also verifies that I am not a criminal.
Considering all the hoops we have to jump through to get one,, Why the hell isn't it good enough to get me into a venue for a simple meal ???
I think the only place (outside of firearm useage) that will accept it as ID is a bank.
It's high time that it should be recognized as a form of ID everywhere that ID is required.
So, let's start flooding the Pollies with written requests for such recognition.