Interesting take on “castle law” by this judge...

[TassieTiger]

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... n__=%2C%3B

“Given you were in lawful ownership of the property, your ex partner has broken in, your lawful removal from the property is unclear to me” lolz.

[No1Mk3]

Given that there is no such thing as "castle law" in this country the beak has dealt with the matter accordingly. Assault with a deadly weapon, I would have handed him 5 years. A few more instances like this and I could see the slimes asking for licensing and registration of bows, as they have already tried here in Vic. Cheers.

[TassieTiger]

It’s kind of funny though - the police escort her there, she breaks in illegally in front of the cops...? Geezus. Lol.

[Oldbloke]

It’s kind of funny though - the police escort her there, she breaks in illegally in front of the cops...? Geezus. Lol.

Yeh, how come she wasn't charged?

[TassieTiger]

That’s it OB, the cops were there with her / for her - they must have been watching her climb in the bloody window lol. Crazy stuff.

[on_one_wheel]

It’s kind of funny though - the police escort her there, she breaks in illegally in front of the cops...? Geezus. Lol.

Yeh, how come she wasn't charged?

I've endured FAR worse than that from a former partner.
She's also entered my property and stolen pets and belongs.

Speaking from experience ... because she's a woman she gets instant victim status and because it's a "domestic issue" between a former couple the police "can't do anything" and the courts are more happy to turn a blind eye to it all.
I've spent an absolute fortune to find that one out.

Apparently it's only men who are perpetrators of family domestic violence.

The system is heavy stacked against men.