pomemax wrote:Most gun safes when people buy them have a facility to add a few people to OPEN it Most people DON,T they just add ONE that normaly leaves the other still set on he default code animalpest find that may help you
eddievic wrote:animalpest wrote:Used a piece of wire to get into the safe.
You blokes can be touchy about someone's knowledge
Sure as mate.
There are a few on here...make you wonder if they are middle/old age men or teenage girls with their behaviour.
Reamers, how much you been paying for yours MM..... maybe you should have gone to specsavers.
https://ssaagunsales.com/listing/20919
Now stop being a troll.
bladeracer wrote:pomemax wrote:Most gun safes when people buy them have a facility to add a few people to OPEN it Most people DON,T they just add ONE that normaly leaves the other still set on he default code animalpest find that may help you
Never seen that, I don't think it applies to most safes, but I guess there must be some safes that do.
BangWhizzClack wrote:bladeracer wrote:pomemax wrote:Most gun safes when people buy them have a facility to add a few people to OPEN it Most people DON,T they just add ONE that normaly leaves the other still set on he default code animalpest find that may help you
Never seen that, I don't think it applies to most safes, but I guess there must be some safes that do.
I can't say I've seen them on gun safes personally, but digital key pads will typically allow a master code, user codes (amount varies) and then have a default code that is eliminated once the master code is set but can be brought back after a hard reset.
marksman wrote:eddievic wrote:animalpest wrote:Used a piece of wire to get into the safe.
You blokes can be touchy about someone's knowledge
Sure as mate.
There are a few on here...make you wonder if they are middle/old age men or teenage girls with their behaviour.
Reamers, how much you been paying for yours MM..... maybe you should have gone to specsavers.
https://ssaagunsales.com/listing/20919
Now stop being a troll.
they are serbian reamers eddie
get it right mate QLD reamers mate QLD
now you know l'm having a bit of fun but l think l need to give you a bit of advice mate,
"sometimes you will look smarter by not saying anything at all"
marksman wrote:rubber pool paint would do the trick Blade https://www.directpoolsupplies.com.au/c ... int-4-l-dg
bladeracer wrote:marksman wrote:rubber pool paint would do the trick Blade https://www.directpoolsupplies.com.au/c ... int-4-l-dg
That looks good MM, thanks for the tip!
Bello wrote:You asked "How full is your safe"
That depends on who's asking.
If it's the wife, then the answer is "I don't need any more guns honey"
If you ask me I would say "I only need one more"
The problem I have noticed with MY gun safe was caused by the government.
They and they alone have caused all my gun safe problems.
See if you can follow my logic here:
The government paced us into lock down. The guns went into the safe. The safe door was shut. It was dark and scary in the safe.
When I reopened the safe , it appears that boredom and mischief led to a multiplying effect. Now the safe is chockers.
What's a guy to do.
I will now need a new safe, some scopes to top the new additions to the family, some range time for load development, countless trips the candy store, sorry I mean the gun shop for projectiles etc etc.
What's a guy to do
deye243 wrote:Well I suppose if I lived in a free country this would be my safe but I don't so it's not .
BangWhizzClack wrote:[quote="d
I wouldn't judge negatively if that was someone's personal collection, but you could arm a small militia with that. Hmm, gives me an idea
JimTom wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:[quote="d
I wouldn't judge negatively if that was someone's personal collection, but you could arm a small militia with that. Hmm, gives me an idea
Dangerous talk mate.
JimTom wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:[quote="d
I wouldn't judge negatively if that was someone's personal collection, but you could arm a small militia with that. Hmm, gives me an idea
Dangerous talk mate.
deye243 wrote:JimTom wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:[quote="d
I wouldn't judge negatively if that was someone's personal collection, but you could arm a small militia with that. Hmm, gives me an idea
Dangerous talk mate.
And there's my point made .
JimTom wrote:Yes it is a free country however I fail to see how using veiled Speech suggesting that one can arm a militia will do the firearm owners in this country any favours. To be honest BWC, one could be forgiven for thinking you are someone on here stirring up rubbish trying to make us look bad. Which side are you really on mate. Some of your perceived extremist comments mate go to far and I am surprised it hasn’t been taken down. The lefties would love some of that stuff to twist around and all of a sudden we are portrayed as a far right extreme ist group.
BangWhizzClack wrote:JimTom wrote:Yes it is a free country however I fail to see how using veiled Speech suggesting that one can arm a militia will do the firearm owners in this country any favours. To be honest BWC, one could be forgiven for thinking you are someone on here stirring up rubbish trying to make us look bad. Which side are you really on mate. Some of your perceived extremist comments mate go to far and I am surprised it hasn’t been taken down. The lefties would love some of that stuff to twist around and all of a sudden we are portrayed as a far right extreme ist group.
1. Not a free country.
2. I'm just pointing out the firepower that individual/group has in their safe.
3. Hey bro, plausible deniability is the name of the game isn't it?
4. 'IF' my idea was to start a militia, why does that make it a far right extremist group? Leftists lable anything right of woke as far right/Nazi/white supremacist etc. Leftists can start militias too, as can centrists, non-voters, mixed etc.
5. If I'm the enemy of shooters for "stirring up rubbish", would that make you an ally for keeping shooters in the rubbish? Because like it or not, we look bad, period. We could all be cleanly shaven, suit wearing yuppies, but as soon as people see a gun, they've been programmed to think negatively about it.
6. Just because you "perceive" my comments as "extremist" doesn't make it so. That's a major problem with how our society works, people are always pandering to the "perceptions" of others, except for Jews and the Woke (that's not anti-semitic, that's just fact) who seem to be the judges of what's right or wrong, good or bad, and we all have to jump through their hoops. When we stop jumping, they go back to controlling their own little group.
So, while I can understand your concern, I am not the enemy of shooters or people who are into weapons/combat in general. If you still believe Australian's are free, why would my comments be a concern?
I'll play ball for as long as is necessary, but it is important to stoke the fire occasionally, otherwise you go to sleep.
bladeracer wrote:In modern Australia you can lose your firearms and licence for nothing more than somebody's perception. There's the over-ride clause in every state's Act that the Commissioner can deem anybody to no longer be "fit and proper" to hold a firearm licence. No evidence of wrong doing or nefarious intent required.
Skinna wrote:Oh dear...
Did someone say something about awareness a while back...?...or did i imagine that...?...
BangWhizzClack wrote:bladeracer wrote:In modern Australia you can lose your firearms and licence for nothing more than somebody's perception. There's the over-ride clause in every state's Act that the Commissioner can deem anybody to no longer be "fit and proper" to hold a firearm licence. No evidence of wrong doing or nefarious intent required.
To my understanding though, correct me if I'm wrong, that can be taken up at VCAT or some other court and a judge decides if it was a reasonable cause or not? It's pretty much what NSC is fighting at the moment.
bladeracer wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:bladeracer wrote:In modern Australia you can lose your firearms and licence for nothing more than somebody's perception. There's the over-ride clause in every state's Act that the Commissioner can deem anybody to no longer be "fit and proper" to hold a firearm licence. No evidence of wrong doing or nefarious intent required.
To my understanding though, correct me if I'm wrong, that can be taken up at VCAT or some other court and a judge decides if it was a reasonable cause or not? It's pretty much what NSC is fighting at the moment.
Anything can be appealed, if you don't mind the time and expense involved in doing so.
Personally, I have too much invested in my firearms and shooting to risk it by saying stupid things online.