straightshooter wrote:Some bright spark will work a way around a forum operator being held as a publisher. Such as requiring all forum posters to identify themselves and accept any and all liability for their posts.
Won't that be fun.
Fionn wrote:The reason that Facebook isn't is that they have successfully claimed they are platform not a publisher. ie they are like a Telstra, they provide the infrastructure, but don't control how people use it.
mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
straightshooter wrote:mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
There are a few simple clinical tests that are used to assess early dementia.
Learn how to fake them and you will keep TPTB fooled for so much longer.
Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
Yes, I've survived. Working in well paid management and consultancy roles up till 18 months ago. So no dementia here sport just intellect and experience.
I still remember a few arrogant, knowall, smart arse young blokes that are now dead. Too bad.
mchughcb wrote:Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
Yes, I've survived. Working in well paid management and consultancy roles up till 18 months ago. So no dementia here sport just intellect and experience.
I still remember a few arrogant, knowall, smart arse young blokes that are now dead. Too bad.
Look on the bright side at least they won't have to listen to demented safety shares at the next safety meeting.
mchughcb wrote:Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
Yes, I've survived. Working in well paid management and consultancy roles up till 18 months ago. So no dementia here sport just intellect and experience.
I still remember a few arrogant, knowall, smart arse young blokes that are now dead. Too bad.
Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:Oldbloke wrote:mchughcb wrote:Imagine being an old bloke. Well you'd be able to show you suffer from dementia and not in charge of your facilities.
Yes, I've survived. Working in well paid management and consultancy roles up till 18 months ago. So no dementia here sport just intellect and experience.
I still remember a few arrogant, knowall, smart arse young blokes that are now dead. Too bad.
Look on the bright side at least they won't have to listen to demented safety shares at the next safety meeting.[/quote]
P.S. you need to change bait. Your B.S. doesn't worry me, because you a troll and most here understand that my friend.
Why don't you go Back to AHN?. Oh, I forgot, your not wanted there either, are you?
deye243 wrote:What do you mean freedom of speech is dying you have lost freedom of speech the day they stop you saying one word no matter how repugnant that word is you should be free to use it in any context you see Fit
Law wrote:Since July 1 in NSW, Victoria and South Australia, a person who claims they've been defamed has to prove they suffered serious harm.
boingk wrote:As usual its a mountain out of a molehill.Law wrote:Since July 1 in NSW, Victoria and South Australia, a person who claims they've been defamed has to prove they suffered serious harm.
No to mention that everyone who spouts "I'm gOinG tO sUE yOu!" whether in real life or over the internet generally have zero idea of what, how or who is involved with that process. Been there many times myself.
As for Facebook? It can go and fornicate with itself for all I care. Its the drug of the uneducated, the unemplyed and the malingering.
- boingk
on_one_wheel wrote:boingk wrote:As usual its a mountain out of a molehill.Law wrote:Since July 1 in NSW, Victoria and South Australia, a person who claims they've been defamed has to prove they suffered serious harm.
No to mention that everyone who spouts "I'm gOinG tO sUE yOu!" whether in real life or over the internet generally have zero idea of what, how or who is involved with that process. Been there many times myself.
As for Facebook? It can go and fornicate with itself for all I care. Its the drug of the uneducated, the unemplyed and the malingering.
- boingk
I had the owner of a firearms shop in SA threatening me with a defamation case after he discovered the review I left online for his business.
He asked me to edit or remove my review or else!
I opted to edit my review, this time I didn't hold back, from his perspective the review was far worse to the power of 10
I was confident that I would be fine even if he could find the tens of thousands it would have cost to pursue as everything in the review was absolutely true and could be proven without a doubt... what a stooge
Fortunately for the shooting community, that joker is out of business, he was nothing short of a law breaking shonk.
Somehow he managed to reset his google account and clear all his bad reviews so unfortunately mine has disappeared but it wasn't long before he attracted plenty of new bad reviews and closed the doors with a 1½ star rating.
Always make sure reviews are to the point and factual
bigpete wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:boingk wrote:As usual its a mountain out of a molehill.Law wrote:Since July 1 in NSW, Victoria and South Australia, a person who claims they've been defamed has to prove they suffered serious harm.
No to mention that everyone who spouts "I'm gOinG tO sUE yOu!" whether in real life or over the internet generally have zero idea of what, how or who is involved with that process. Been there many times myself.
As for Facebook? It can go and fornicate with itself for all I care. Its the drug of the uneducated, the unemplyed and the malingering.
- boingk
I had the owner of a firearms shop in SA threatening me with a defamation case after he discovered the review I left online for his business.
He asked me to edit or remove my review or else!
I opted to edit my review, this time I didn't hold back, from his perspective the review was far worse to the power of 10
I was confident that I would be fine even if he could find the tens of thousands it would have cost to pursue as everything in the review was absolutely true and could be proven without a doubt... what a stooge
Fortunately for the shooting community, that joker is out of business, he was nothing short of a law breaking shonk.
Somehow he managed to reset his google account and clear all his bad reviews so unfortunately mine has disappeared but it wasn't long before he attracted plenty of new bad reviews and closed the doors with a 1½ star rating.
Always make sure reviews are to the point and factual
Hmmm.....R and R customs ?