Oldbloke wrote:Rather than de-rail the WW111 thread thought I would start this.
I’m sure all here would agree our current defense forces are seriously lacking.
IMO we could start to improve it by the following.
1. Purchase or build about a 20 cans of sunshine. Deploy-able from land, sea and air.
2. Re invigorate the Army Reserve System and all participants store at home a rifle with 200 rounds and a couple of grenades.
3. Lease 3 or 4 nuke submarines ASAP.
4. Start building ships, fast. We are able to do this.
5. Increase ammo production/storage. ADI & NIOA can help with that.
5. Increase fuel storage in AU.
6. Buy more off the shelf aircraft.
Any improvements? Open to discussion.
P.S. It will be too late to start in 10 years. Perhaps even now.
bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Rather than de-rail the WW111 thread thought I would start this.
I’m sure all here would agree our current defense forces are seriously lacking.
IMO we could start to improve it by the following.
1. Purchase or build about a 20 cans of sunshine. Deploy-able from land, sea and air.
2. Re invigorate the Army Reserve System and all participants store at home a rifle with 200 rounds and a couple of grenades.
3. Lease 3 or 4 nuke submarines ASAP.
4. Start building ships, fast. We are able to do this.
5. Increase ammo production/storage. ADI & NIOA can help with that.
5. Increase fuel storage in AU.
6. Buy more off the shelf aircraft.
Any improvements? Open to discussion.
P.S. It will be too late to start in 10 years. Perhaps even now.
i agree on all your points 1. except the cans of sunshine . to use them would result in the end of everything . everything you advise is doable , but our leaders move too slow to keep up with crisis . 2. leasing or buying current nuke subs should be the number one priority .
Blr243 wrote:Sco mo just announced 65 million dollars of our tax to put a man on the moon. That’s ridiculous if we need money for war or to improve so many other current situation s ......putting a man on the moon is like me goin to cape York in October , totally unnecessary and just a bit of fun
Blr243 wrote:Sco mo just announced 65 million dollars of our tax to put a man on the moon. That’s ridiculous if we need money for war or to improve so many other current situation s ......putting a man on the moon is like me goin to cape York in October , totally unnecessary and just a bit of fun
Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Rather than de-rail the WW111 thread thought I would start this.
I’m sure all here would agree our current defense forces are seriously lacking.
IMO we could start to improve it by the following.
1. Purchase or build about a 20 cans of sunshine. Deploy-able from land, sea and air.
2. Re invigorate the Army Reserve System and all participants store at home a rifle with 200 rounds and a couple of grenades.
3. Lease 3 or 4 nuke submarines ASAP.
4. Start building ships, fast. We are able to do this.
5. Increase ammo production/storage. ADI & NIOA can help with that.
5. Increase fuel storage in AU.
6. Buy more off the shelf aircraft.
Any improvements? Open to discussion.
P.S. It will be too late to start in 10 years. Perhaps even now.
i agree on all your points 1. except the cans of sunshine . to use them would result in the end of everything . everything you advise is doable , but our leaders move too slow to keep up with crisis . 2. leasing or buying current nuke subs should be the number one priority .
1. Sorry I disagree. They would be a strong deterrent. China, India, Pakistan, Israel, UK, US, France, Russia, Nth Korea all have them. Perhaps more. But agree that actually using of them is a crap idea.
2. Agree 100%. I just listed them as they popped in my head. never gave priority any thought.
Oldbloke wrote:Blr243 wrote:Sco mo just announced 65 million dollars of our tax to put a man on the moon. That’s ridiculous if we need money for war or to improve so many other current situation s ......putting a man on the moon is like me goin to cape York in October , totally unnecessary and just a bit of fun
Mate that belongs in the "Joke thread". You are joking, right?
on_one_wheel wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Blr243 wrote:Sco mo just announced 65 million dollars of our tax to put a man on the moon. That’s ridiculous if we need money for war or to improve so many other current situation s ......putting a man on the moon is like me goin to cape York in October , totally unnecessary and just a bit of fun
Mate that belongs in the "Joke thread". You are joking, right?
Totally agree, spending money on visiting the moon is as ridiculous as blowing money on attempts to colonies a dead planet... Mars, it's a pointless waste of money , resources and environmentally irresponsible for no gain to the inhabitants of earth.
jwai86 wrote:What are these cans of sunshine that people are referring to?
on_one_wheel wrote:Compulsory service in the military for young able bodied adults, even if it's as little as 1 year, It'll give them life skills, real training, work ethics and ensure we have plenty of troops.
cz515 wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Compulsory service in the military for young able bodied adults, even if it's as little as 1 year, It'll give them life skills, real training, work ethics and ensure we have plenty of troops.
Australian military has said it plenty of times they are not a baby sitting service
bladeracer wrote:cz515 wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Compulsory service in the military for young able bodied adults, even if it's as little as 1 year, It'll give them life skills, real training, work ethics and ensure we have plenty of troops.
Australian military has said it plenty of times they are not a baby sitting service
Which is why our entire military is probably smaller than Bunnings.
Ukraine is handing out AK's to the citizenry, can you imagine trying to do similar here, our people would be a liability, not an asset
Blr243 wrote:Sco mo just announced 65 million dollars of our tax to put a man on the moon. That’s ridiculous if we need money for war or to improve so many other current situation s ......putting a man on the moon is like me goin to cape York in October , totally unnecessary and just a bit of fun
womble wrote:I would go nuclear just to piss of the greens. If for no other reason
bladeracer wrote:Which is why our entire military is probably smaller than Bunnings.
on_one_wheel wrote:bladeracer wrote:Which is why our entire military is probably smaller than Bunnings.
Extremely close... apparently Bunnings employ 48,000 people.
To bad we can't defend our nation by enlisting people armed with bar code scanners.
bladeracer wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:bladeracer wrote:Which is why our entire military is probably smaller than Bunnings.
Extremely close... apparently Bunnings employ 48,000 people.
To bad we can't defend our nation by enlisting people armed with bar code scanners.
McDonalds employ 100,000, we could arm them all
Bugman wrote:bladeracer wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:bladeracer wrote:Which is why our entire military is probably smaller than Bunnings.
Extremely close... apparently Bunnings employ 48,000 people.
To bad we can't defend our nation by enlisting people armed with bar code scanners.
McDonalds employ 100,000, we could arm them all
Do you want fries with that?