alexjones wrote:Next week Trump wins. Time to end this bloodshed.
mchughcb wrote:Well Ukraine just said if they don't mobilise another 160k personnel by Christmas to hold the line they will capitulate.
Get ready
Larry wrote:We always knew it would be a war of attrition esp after the first year. The fact Russia is using its little buddy to prop up resources in people. The one thing you would have though they had in endless supply esp compared to Ukraine. That would suggest that they have not been winning really no one is winning they are just hitting each other like stand up boxers.
straightshooter wrote:When Russia's initial show of force failed to cower Ukraine into some form of submission, Russia systematically embarked on a gradual war of attrition but with purportedly limited objectives.
This strategy allowed Russia to train many more men and build up necessary industries. Meanwhile no NATO country has been willing to stick it's neck out and become a co-belligerent thereby abandoning article 5 protection. Amazingly very few countries have boosted munition production to any sort of scale that might come near to meeting wartime needs.
What does that tell you? Essentially the US, the UK and all their vassal states have no stomach for a real war no matter how bellicose their rhetoric may be.
Do you think that might not have been observed by Russia?
Having now expended so much blood and treasure I think the Russians would have to have $#!T for brains to enter into any peace deal which would simply turn out be a hiatus in hostilities, much like a reprise of the Minsk agreements. I suspect the aim of Russia is to keep chipping away until they are in a position to demand and get an unconditional surrender from Ukraine.
alexjones wrote:Tomorrow, the end of the war will be near!
straightshooter wrote:When Russia's initial show of force failed to cower Ukraine into some form of submission, Russia systematically embarked on a gradual war of attrition but with purportedly limited objectives.
This strategy allowed Russia to train many more men and build up necessary industries. Meanwhile no NATO country has been willing to stick it's neck out and become a co-belligerent thereby abandoning article 5 protection. Amazingly very few countries have boosted munition production to any sort of scale that might come near to meeting wartime needs.
What does that tell you? Essentially the US, the UK and all their vassal states have no stomach for a real war no matter how bellicose their rhetoric may be.
Do you think that might not have been observed by Russia?
Having now expended so much blood and treasure I think the Russians would have to have $#!T for brains to enter into any peace deal which would simply turn out be a hiatus in hostilities, much like a reprise of the Minsk agreements. I suspect the aim of Russia is to keep chipping away until they are in a position to demand and get an unconditional surrender from Ukraine.
Oldbloke wrote:"When the conflict is over we'll unfortunately find out how many actually died in Ukraine for something that could have been resolved with a pen in Turkey."
OR:
by Putin simply accepting that Ukraine is a country in its own right.
But instead, Putin wants to wind the clock back about 25 years. In the process murdering perhaps 1 ml innocents. Why, GREED.
IMHO, needs a good dose of lead.
Wapiti wrote:Looking around at private news reports, that is, not any BS stuff from the mainstream media who are fed sh*t by the war industrial complex, Ukraine is being flogged and is almost on the edge.
Sure the Russians are losing massive amounts of men and equipment, that's to be expected without the use of tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, but Ukraine is gone. No matter who wins the US election.
mchughcb wrote:Wapiti wrote:Looking around at private news reports, that is, not any BS stuff from the mainstream media who are fed sh*t by the war industrial complex, Ukraine is being flogged and is almost on the edge.
Sure the Russians are losing massive amounts of men and equipment, that's to be expected without the use of tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, but Ukraine is gone. No matter who wins the US election.
Yep. Once a critical point is reached and I believe it maybe this winter with no power and no air defence that will be it. Unconditional surrender or a coupe deta.
Billo wrote:mchughcb wrote:Wapiti wrote:Looking around at private news reports, that is, not any BS stuff from the mainstream media who are fed sh*t by the war industrial complex, Ukraine is being flogged and is almost on the edge.
Sure the Russians are losing massive amounts of men and equipment, that's to be expected without the use of tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, but Ukraine is gone. No matter who wins the US election.
Yep. Once a critical point is reached and I believe it maybe this winter with no power and no air defence that will be it. Unconditional surrender or a coupe deta.
The critical point for Putin would seem to be the Election today. 8 more years of Democrat control guarantees the new President will outlast Vlad.
bringing Nth Korean troops onboard is a sign of desperation
alexjones wrote:I will never understand the crazy one sided logic. Whatever Putin does is desperation but Ukraine does the same thing and it shows they are winning.
mchughcb wrote:alexjones wrote:I will never understand the crazy one sided logic. Whatever Putin does is desperation but Ukraine does the same thing and it shows they are winning.
Welcome to the logic mechanics of some people posting here. If you point out what is happening on the ground you are a Russian bot. If you continually post some Ukraine headline out of the Sun then you are a supporter of democracy.
Well Russ8an bot it is.