
womble wrote:Emma Lovell’s killer got 14 years. A soft sentence under the previous Labor government that many of us found disgusting.
Now it’s been reduced again, to 8 years 4 months minimum. Another heartless kick in the guts for the family.
This scum will now be back on the streets in 5 years.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/15/teenager-who-murdered-emma-lovell-has-sentence-reduced-on-appeal-ntwnfb



deye243 wrote:Life never to see freedom ever again


Wapiti wrote:How can anyone expect a fair outcome for the public when even after bringing in "tougher" laws, the judges deliberately soften the sentences and look to the criminals well-being instead of the victims?
"How dare a politician make the decision of me, the all important Judge? I'll show them!"
We all know what the judges and senior police like to do in their spare time don't we? Try as they might, the truth always comes out, as much as so many like to hide from us. Those who are aware see it bubbling away.

womble wrote:Wapiti wrote:How can anyone expect a fair outcome for the public when even after bringing in "tougher" laws, the judges deliberately soften the sentences and look to the criminals well-being instead of the victims?
"How dare a politician make the decision of me, the all important Judge? I'll show them!"
We all know what the judges and senior police like to do in their spare time don't we? Try as they might, the truth always comes out, as much as so many like to hide from us. Those who are aware see it bubbling away.
Well that’s easy and once again your ignorance dribbles out.
When you bring in your tough new laws you bring in tough minimum sentencing.
Unlike Chrisofulloshit who only increased maximum sentencing.
The judges don’t make the laws.

bigrich wrote:deye243 wrote:Life never to see freedom ever again
if you intentionally took a life, you'd forfeit your own . that's what justice used to be . a eye for a eye . now scumbags like this one get stuff all . where's the deterrent against committing crime . auntie pauline wants to bring back the death penalty for these sorts of crimes . i agree


deye243 wrote:I agree with the death penalty but only if you are caught in the act too many people have been executed for crimes they never committed because they were convicted on evidence only


Wapiti wrote:Just on the news this morning, coppers on the Gold Coast looking for some human scum that ran over a 50+YO lady when stealing her car, she's in a critical condition in hospital.
These c***s do not deserve time in jail. "Adult" or adequate time. They should be hung from the nearest light pole where they destroyed a family by the neck until they rot enough to drop onto the footpath from their deserved punishment and are scraped up into a garbage compactor by a bobcat.


Wapiti wrote:The hanging part is the bit that would deter would -be delinquents.
Most of these society-manufactured germs are showoffs and terribly precious and vain. Posting illegal behaviour to show off on social media, prissing around like pomptuous kings and queens, it's all about building up a fake narrative for otherwise pointless oxygen thieves.
Being hung naked from a post at an intersection and having the public seeing their tiny appendages would terrify them more than the slow process of them carking it slowly from exposure hanging there.
People who would do the act I described earlier that just happened, which also destroys a whole family unit forever, deserve no mercy, or second chances.
I'm talking about an obvious deliberate act here, proven without doubt.
The people denying true justice, the people who make the decisions not to punish animals like these are the cause of any and all repetition in our society.



Wapiti wrote:I think you're missing my point Rich.
I'm not saying I would be a vigilante - I never said that so why am I a danger who has to keep quiet?
I would be called a lunatic or danger to society whatever else the people who let crims ruin all your lives use as an excuse to do nothing.
Everyone knows why this sh*t is happening, grubs have no fear and do what they like. Over and over.
Yeah, hanging someone from a light pole is not acceptable in a supposed "civilised" society, but you tell me that if some grub run over your wife stealing your car, a repeat offender that has been let off time and time again by the sick judges that are supposed to dish out "punishment and deterrents", you wouldn't want justice?
What you and I see as justice might be different.
F**k, some of you would call it a thought crime to even dream about revenge, I can only imagine how terrible it would be to be a relative of a victim like that knowing that everyone is shaking in their shoes even thinking of demanding just punishment.

alexjones wrote:Magistrates, judges, justices whatever title they want should be an elected position. The judiciary is an important part of government and they are unelected and unaccountable to the people!!!
If their job was on the line every X amount of years, they would adhere to community expectations.

alexjones wrote:Magistrates, judges, justices whatever title they want should be an elected position. The judiciary is an important part of government and they are unelected and unaccountable to the people!!!
If their job was on the line every X amount of years, they would adhere to community expectations.

womble wrote:alexjones wrote:Magistrates, judges, justices whatever title they want should be an elected position. The judiciary is an important part of government and they are unelected and unaccountable to the people!!!
If their job was on the line every X amount of years, they would adhere to community expectations.
I'd argue that community expectations is constitutional.
Judged by a jury of their peers.

bigrich wrote:womble wrote:alexjones wrote:Magistrates, judges, justices whatever title they want should be an elected position. The judiciary is an important part of government and they are unelected and unaccountable to the people!!!
If their job was on the line every X amount of years, they would adhere to community expectations.
I'd argue that community expectations is constitutional.
Judged by a jury of their peers.
I reckon we reintroduce mob justice and bounty hunters lol


