Daddybang wrote:duncan61 wrote:Super star.I liked SLR and greens.The plastic stuff and bubble pattern camo was just coming in when I left.I carried the Bren for the last year I was there.I was offered a Bren not that long ago for $1500.Not sure they will licence it for shooting green eye finch
Isn't the bren a full auto lmg? As such isn't it highly illegal to privately own one and has been for many many years?
duncan61 wrote:I was joking
Gwion wrote:duncan61 wrote:I was joking
You do realise that these 'jokes' can be taken out of context and used to illustrate (wrongly) that the shooting community is full of people with no regard for the laws?
It is not a great idea and this is not the first time you have alluded to legally questionable practices on your part!
Daddybang wrote:Gwion wrote:duncan61 wrote:I was joking
You do realise that these 'jokes' can be taken out of context and used to illustrate (wrongly) that the shooting community is full of people with no regard for the laws?
It is not a great idea and this is not the first time you have alluded to legally questionable practices on your part!
Yep that's what those emoti things are there.
Back to the topic I was reading an article yesterday(it was a week old) where a feminist was talking about the special forces and how women are more than capable of filling this role. No worries with that but in the next breath she was complaining that the selection process was all geared towards men and it should be changed to make it easier for women to get thru and she was saying this with a straight face
Gamerancher wrote:You want to talk about "equality" crap?
The NSW fire brigade has made it compulsory that 50% of all fire-fighters now employed are women, with a corresponding drop in selection standards so that they can pass.
doc wrote:I reckon this is part of the true agenda of Political Correctness - not to actually be correct and 'nice', but to bring about major illogical change that would otherwise be slammed down with an excuse of it being PC, equality, or whatever 'current social warrior trend' they put on it to serve a 'who knows what' purpose.
sungazer wrote:The other side of the coin is that just recently in Syria where there were two forces 1 of men and 1 of women the womens army was the more successful and feared by ISIS.
Gwion wrote:I don't care if you're a man, a woman, gay, straight or tranny. If you can prove yourself capable of a role then you should be in that role. However, "dumbing down" selection criteria in any role, but especially in mission critical roles, just endangers yourself, your colleagues and ultimately, the mission. This is true in business, emergency services and the armed forces.
Some roles are fairly utilitarian, and that's fine for a pretty generalist selection, but others just have specific requirements for mission success and if you can't meet them you either need more preparation before applying or reevaluate your grasp on reality!
sungazer wrote:The other side of the coin is that just recently in Syria where there were two forces 1 of men and 1 of women the womens army was the more successful and feared by ISIS.