I don't think 'better' is really a factor. I mean, they are all old neglected rifles that seen better days. Anything modern is usually better and cheaper. So saying one heap of wood and steel is better than another, functionally speaking means nothing to me. I have both ends of the spectrum and I value for example an old battle worn 91/30 above my K31... Heathen, I hear you say, but old guns, their history and perceived feeling of fun to shoot, which is different for everyone, means a lot more to me than a smooth bolt. I am more interested in its history, usage and engineering path someone took to get there. "Better" is subjective. Swedish Mauser is pretty neat, I'd like one, but it's not on my top 5 to get list. Possibly around number 7