TassieTiger wrote:No Glenn, my mate deano is as straight laced as they come. The problem is he exaggerated his attendances - so effectively lied to the police, never a good idea. The other problem is that he is so laid back, he will take this in his stride and say oh well - those shooting days were fun, pass me a beer and that will be that...he won’t fight it, he doesn’t see or care for the bigger picture.
It’s strange that he got the call in the first place...but for others licence holders, forewarned is foreArmed...
AussieCapitalist wrote:TassieTiger wrote:No Glenn, my mate deano is as straight laced as they come. The problem is he exaggerated his attendances - so effectively lied to the police, never a good idea. The other problem is that he is so laid back, he will take this in his stride and say oh well - those shooting days were fun, pass me a beer and that will be that...he won’t fight it, he doesn’t see or care for the bigger picture.
It’s strange that he got the call in the first place...but for others licence holders, forewarned is foreArmed...
See, he probably is a nice bloke and he thought he was doing the right thing talking to the police without seeking legal advise. As a fit and proper person I do not condone lying to the police, however I am an advocate of people seeking legal advise before talking to the government. Purely for the fact that it could have long standing repercussions. He may not be able to get a passport if he has firearm related charges and if he does America and some other countries will not allow him to enter with that on his record. Fire related charges may bar him from owning firearms for a long time.
TassieTiger wrote:
He is a top bloke, but too carefree really...what ever will be will be kinda thing. I’d hazard a guess he will lose his licence without charges, wapol got what they wanted, no point going further - but hey, I was wrong on this to start with so who knows. They even took his scopes on the rifles - I told him he should demanded to remove them as they aren’t registered items...sigh.
Jacky_Boy wrote:Well s**t boys, I didn't think it would be such a big deal, but now I'm reconsidering getting both.
I actually found a property near me in Albany that will do multiple calibres for a fair price on the one letter. If I had to choose, I would go the 06 as it gives me more options. It's still a heard choice though as the 308 has a nice short heavy barrel. It's tempting to try and get them both through as I would genuinely use them for different purposes. I'm buying the rifles from over east though, so they'd be sitting in limbo in a WA gunshop while I get the paperwork sorted.
What happens if one doesn't get approved, do you just get the gunshop to sell it for you and lose out some coin?
bladeracer wrote:Don't you have to buy a new property letter for each rifle every year?
glenn777 wrote:bladeracer wrote:Don't you have to buy a new property letter for each rifle every year?
No, it's a one off with the gun application.
You can have one property letter for multiple guns if it's big enough. I got 3 in my first application just to save in the initial ($280~) cost!
bladeracer wrote:glenn777 wrote:bladeracer wrote:Don't you have to buy a new property letter for each rifle every year?
No, it's a one off with the gun application.
You can have one property letter for multiple guns if it's big enough. I got 3 in my first application just to save in the initial ($280~) cost!
In that case I don't see why Police have any interest in how many times you'd attend the property.
Do you actually shoot on that property or is it still just a cash cow for property owners selling letters for firearm applications?
glenn777 wrote:Personally I'm lucky in that I have family who own large farms and friends also, so have no trouble getting a property letter from multiple sources.
I'm sure farmers do do it especially for inner city folk who want rec/hunt/shoot licences, most gun shops will provide you a letter for a price.
Ziege wrote:Who buys letters anyway, lame as... Get out off the couch and meet people and network. Why rely on something that is essentially on the chopping block as we speak?
TassieTiger wrote:Ziege wrote:Who buys letters anyway, lame as... Get out off the couch and meet people and network. Why rely on something that is essentially on the chopping block as we speak?
I cannot fathom “buying” letters...it makes a complete mockery of the system...wanna a gun mate? Here I’ll print and sign this for $300 but I don’t want you actually using the property...only the letter.
Maybe that’s why my mate got called Re his firearms - perhaps wapol are looking at the insane process..don’t know.
Ziege wrote:Who buys letters anyway, lame as... Get out off the couch and meet people and network. Why rely on something that is essentially on the chopping block as we speak?
TassieTiger wrote:Ziege wrote:Who buys letters anyway, lame as... Get out off the couch and meet people and network. Why rely on something that is essentially on the chopping block as we speak?
I cannot fathom “buying” letters...it makes a complete mockery of the system...wanna a gun mate? Here I’ll print and sign this for $300 but I don’t want you actually using the property...only the letter.
Maybe that’s why my mate got called Re his firearms - perhaps wapol are looking at the insane process..don’t know.
TassieTiger wrote:Maybe that’s why my mate got called Re his firearms - perhaps wapol are looking at the insane process..don’t know.
glenn777 wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Maybe that’s why my mate got called Re his firearms - perhaps wapol are looking at the insane process..don’t know.
You know what that might be it, the 'letter' he used for his rifles might be getting flagged on WAPOL's end as a 'bought' letter as there's probably a million other applications for the same farm and they're trying to weed out who actually shoots on the farm and who loopholed it..
AussieCapitalist wrote:Thats what I find annoying with he term loophole when people think its a bad thing. A loophole is simply using a law or regulation to its full potential. Like how losers complain about negative gearing like its some loophole for the rich. Negative gearing is available for all to use equally.
bladeracer wrote:glenn777 wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Maybe that’s why my mate got called Re his firearms - perhaps wapol are looking at the insane process..don’t know.
You know what that might be it, the 'letter' he used for his rifles might be getting flagged on WAPOL's end as a 'bought' letter as there's probably a million other applications for the same farm and they're trying to weed out who actually shoots on the farm and who loopholed it..
Which would be fine...if only loopholes were illegal.
What they need to do is change the law if they're not happy with it, then enforce that law, not make stuff up themselves.