Boundry Rider wrote:So now a link has been posted, people have had a chance to read through the transcript and adult content is able to be posted.
How was the case lost?
I'm still waiting to be further spoon fed by geoff
Boundry Rider wrote:So now a link has been posted, people have had a chance to read through the transcript and adult content is able to be posted.
How was the case lost?
Boundry Rider wrote:animalpest wrote:Yep, lots of shooters today think they are snipers and want to shoot at animals up to 1500m away.
A shooter I know of took that very argument to appeal a rejection about 5-6 years ago and somehow won his application for a 338LAP. Not sure of the points of argument that were won and lost but this was his grounds for genuine need, and he got his rifle without too much fuss.
Don’t know of many that would even find an animal at that distance, and no it wasn’t applied for in camel country.
Boundry Rider wrote:So now a link has been posted, people have had a chance to read through the transcript and adult content is able to be posted.
How was the case lost?
Boundry Rider wrote:animalpest wrote:Yep, lots of shooters today think they are snipers and want to shoot at animals up to 1500m away.
A shooter I know of took that very argument to appeal a rejection about 5-6 years ago and somehow won his application for a 338LAP. Not sure of the points of argument that were won and lost but this was his grounds for genuine need, and he got his rifle without too much fuss.
Don’t know of many that would even find an animal at that distance, and no it wasn’t applied for in camel country.
S O K A R wrote:Boundry Rider wrote:animalpest wrote:Yep, lots of shooters today think they are snipers and want to shoot at animals up to 1500m away.
A shooter I know of took that very argument to appeal a rejection about 5-6 years ago and somehow won his application for a 338LAP. Not sure of the points of argument that were won and lost but this was his grounds for genuine need, and he got his rifle without too much fuss.
Don’t know of many that would even find an animal at that distance, and no it wasn’t applied for in camel country.
I know of someone here in tas that won an appeal, tas pol made his life hell moving foward as far as odd timed/very frequent inspections/future pta's etc
I've also heard stories of police in other states revoking someones licence on BS grounds after they had won an appeal...
Curious, has something similar ever happened to anyone here?
geoff wrote:This is just such a terrible analysis of the decision:
https://nationalshooting.org.au/shock-c ... distances/
If he is a professional shooter, why wasn't that a factor int he SAT Decision? Anyone who's acually read it can see that they discuss the entire appeal from the perspective of a recreational shooter.
I expect nothing less from the organisation trying to convince shooters in Vic to vote Lib/Nat hahaha
cz515 wrote:In the nsc initial article they called him a pro shooter
animalpest wrote:geoff wrote:This is just such a terrible analysis of the decision:
https://nationalshooting.org.au/shock-c ... distances/
If he is a professional shooter, why wasn't that a factor int he SAT Decision? Anyone who's acually read it can see that they discuss the entire appeal from the perspective of a recreational shooter.
I expect nothing less from the organisation trying to convince shooters in Vic to vote Lib/Nat hahaha
He is not a professional shooter. Hence that argument never came up in the SAT case.
animalpest wrote:cz515 wrote:In the nsc initial article they called him a pro shooter
They called him a "pest controller". Inferences.
animalpest wrote:No, I wouldn't have my employees shoot pigs and dogs with a .338 because I don't have one and don't need one.
Amityville wrote:animalpest wrote:No, I wouldn't have my employees shoot pigs and dogs with a .338 because I don't have one and don't need one.
Agree - Neither would I.
Would a 300Win MAg be suitable for shooting feral dogs / pigs on a suitably large sized property like Eudamullah station?
If one were unable to get closer than 200m but still wanted to ensure quck humane kill for accurate shots up to 500m?