Pauline on gun laws 1997

Questions about Federal gun laws covering all of Australia. Importing / exporting firearms and ammunition. Dealing with Australian Border Force, Customs etc.

Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Baronvonrort » 04 Jul 2016, 7:11 pm

I found this, very interesting.

www.gwb.com.au/onenation/speeches/sept97b.html
Baronvonrort
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 906
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by adam » 04 Jul 2016, 9:36 pm

Nearly 20 years ago, and as true today as ever... It's good to see her back. It was a disgusting time for the Liberals - first with the PA cover-up and then the slush fund to get her put in Jail.
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 04 Jul 2016, 11:22 pm

The best outcome of this farcical election is the the Pauline Hanson IS BACK!..... she is great value and the one who will ask the tough question, and I'm sure make the most of her parliamentary privilege...
I loved the signs they were holding, "my office or yours.."... :lol:

But crikey I cant believe it, the firearm deaths were trending down before 1996.... :sarcasm:
Have a go at the response to her speech, what a bunch of so and sos, "

Hansard here page 8993.

and the general level of hoplo and how little they thought of gun owners....PVC pipes buried, how if they really wanted to 'disarm Australians' then they'd be disarmed....

".....In New South Wales around 150,000 automatic and semiautomatic firearms have been handed in. "..... of course they were.. :roll: mostly fully automatic machine weapon guns no doubt...


".....some 617,416 weapons have actually been handed in, and now Australia is a much safer place. ".......yes. yes it is. :roll: now the rainbow coloured Unicorns are free to safely canter across the daisy lined meadows...
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Berper » 06 Jul 2016, 3:20 pm

"In New South Wales around 150,000 automatic and semiautomatic firearms have been handed in. "..... of course they were.. :roll: mostly fully automatic machine weapon guns no doubt...


So 1 automatic and 149,999 semi autos.

And 149,998 in 22lr :lol:
Berper
Private
Private
 
Posts: 98
Tasmania

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by dugachelli » 06 Jul 2016, 9:36 pm

Lets hope we can claw our way back to where we were.........Keep up the fight.
User avatar
dugachelli
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 27
Western Australia

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by adam » 07 Jul 2016, 8:40 am

Ditching the registry would be a good (and more secure) start. Canada have already done it, as have NZ. NZ leading the way and Australia falling behind... that just ain't Cricket. ;)
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Baronvonrort » 07 Jul 2016, 9:46 am

adam wrote:Ditching the registry would be a good (and more secure) start. Canada have already done it, as have NZ. NZ leading the way and Australia falling behind... that just ain't Cricket. ;)


The hoplophobes cannot be reasoned with they believe registration does something, when they compare car registration to tracking motoring offences ask them if they want to put number plates on guns.
Baronvonrort
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 906
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 07 Jul 2016, 10:35 am

The only way laws can change is by ALL licence holders and those sufficiently concerned SPEAK with one voice. that may occur via ON in the Senate, petition !!

Let's first see what strength ON has in the Senate but regardless, just one MP can table a petition, if there are enough punters behind it.. :clap:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Sydor » 02 Aug 2016, 9:58 am

Once voice would be good. Unfortunately ON would not unite the LAFO.
A lot of other ON policies are plain toxic for many LAFO, including myself.

We need to work on uniting ourselves around some sort of conservative platform that does not marginalise migrants (like myself), and others.
Sydor
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 42
Victoria

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Gwion » 02 Aug 2016, 3:46 pm

Personally think we need to unite around a bipartisan or 'nonpartisan' platform to be inclusive and representative of the diverse background of people who enjoy recreational shooting while progressing past this aggressively adversarial and failing system that we continue to tolerate here in Australia.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Baronvonrort » 02 Aug 2016, 4:44 pm

One of the problems we have is too many groups competing for our vote since we don't have huge numbers we need greater unity, gun laws are a state issue so vital to vote for SFFP in state elections yet there is not much they can do at federal level, Leyonhjelm has proven his worth at Federal level and I prefer the LDP firearms policy along with them not being a single issue party.
I don't agree with all the LDP policies yet the reality is any party would be lucky to get half of what they really want.

Looking at senate results for Vic the LDP and SFFP along with Ricky Muir are trailing the Animal justice party which would be a disaster if the AJP get a seat, In NSW Leyonjelm might just scrape in despite fierce competition from the SFFP.
There is talk the LDP might scrape in with a seat in Qld.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-elec ... lts/senate

I hope those who voted SFFP at number 1 in the federal election put the LDP at number 2, in NSW the SFFP had Fred Nile at number 2 which was unacceptable to me.

There is a good chance many of those who voted for the marijuana party had LDP at number 2, the Hemp party wrote the LDP policy for pot.
Baronvonrort
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 906
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by DrDerpy » 04 Aug 2016, 9:59 pm

I am willing to look past certain parties base beliefs and other undesirable bits if they are going to help us get what we want.
Life is a series of compromises I think, well it is f***ing playing out that way anyway, plus the non action by the ALP on the firearms issues when they had 3 years of government speaks volumes.
I doubt the LNP at any level want to make them more reasonable as they all seem to worship at the altar of Howard.
User avatar
DrDerpy
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 34
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by happyhunter » 05 Aug 2016, 7:10 pm

She struggles to construct a coherent sentence, yet another moron rides the racist under current into our house of review. GO DEMOCRACY!
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 05 Aug 2016, 8:14 pm

Moron or not, half a million of your fellow Aussies voted for her, and consider that she was one of the VERY FEW voices that countered little Johnnie in Parliament when HE decided to take our guns away.

Yes. THATS democracy.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Gwion » 06 Aug 2016, 8:34 am

Democracy also voted Hitler in..... and if you look at Hanson and One Nation, there are quite a few parallels to be drawn between their history and that of the N.A.Z.I Party.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 06 Aug 2016, 9:42 am

You are absolutely correct g, he was voted in...and he always got around in an open top motorcar. Imagine how long obumma or our polls would last without RPG proof tanks protecting them.....

BTW, a good number of German are wondering whether they'd be better off with a Hitler today...rather than a commie / internationalist / open border leader....

And Na-zi is a contraction rather than an abbreviation.... you know I like to help ;)
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Gwion » 06 Aug 2016, 9:50 am

oh god... the world is doomed.....

If there are people thinking that another Hitter is acceptable or prefferable i'm going to live in a cave!

AS for Hitler getting about in an open vehicle: he didn't seem to get about too much at all towards the end, did he. Did a lot of ducking and weaving to no avail because the world figured he and his monstrous minion for what they were!
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 06 Aug 2016, 10:55 am

Actual didn't see any ducking.... not much weaving either, he lived a long healthy life in Argentina..... oh did I say that :silent:
:lol: :allegedly: :sarcasm:

Its all about Nationalism vs Internationalism, and the media/entertainment industry has demonised Nationalism to the point where people are no longer proud to put THEIR country's interests above 'the collective'.....doesnt mean you ARE A NAZI.....or a neonazi, or a skin head or whatever... it means you want protected borders, the opportunity to decide who comes here and on what terms, protect industries and promote/encourage/support the RETURN of the industries they were exported c/- Gough (post Lima agreement).... Our government actively removed industries and send them oversea to support International Development, they then set up a government department to facilitate such wanton destruction and called it the Australian Agency for International development.....known as AusAID (not Aus Aid or Ausaid!) People support this because they incorrectly assume aid = food, yes, they do the food thing as well but its not the primary motivation, which is to develop, being the transformation from undeveloped to developed with infrastructure and industries, sound great but as we've seen, that development then through cheaper costs and wages 'steals' our industries......

As a result of this nation-scale multi-decadal self flagellation, we are no longer self sufficient and absolutely reliant on import for everything from socks and jocks to cars and machinery, and should the shipping lanes be closed or otherwise less 'operative'..... we'd be stuffed. [South China sea disagreement anyone??]

On the Internationalist bandwagon; UN, socialist/communist ideology, successive Australian governments, whether they claim to be red, blue, left, right, whatever, have absolutely conspired to destroy our prosperity. In so many ways....through so many international agreements, treaties... not the least of which is to expose all the unsecured creditors of the 'Aussie' banks to potential BAIL-INS should liquidity become 'problematic' again, that's YOU/US - so if things go bad WE LOSE our deposits. Like magic they will go - why? because 'they' decided in Europe. Remember the G20 in Brisbane? it was decided for us back then....

and there is so much we dont know, for example the 'carbon tax' involved an agreement to pay a straight 10% of the takings directly to the UN Environment fund...why? to what ends and what benefit? To save the yellow bellied duck billed monkey snake in Fakmanistan??

We've been taken for a long ride and we 'need' representative who will ask the tough questions and raise the matters that the majority of puppets in the parliaments are allergic to and would rather not raise....thats why the establishment try as the might to DESTROY those who dont tow the line, thats why they persecuted Pauline, the media tried to destroy her, and thats NOW why they are sowing the seeds to denigrate Pauline's number 2 - Malcolm Roberts, he penned a 'Sovereign Citizen' letter..who cares.... and link it with an organised domestic terrorism movement.... which is a fantasy. They're making out as though he is some kind of heretic - because he doesnt follow the man-made climate change bunkem.... I cant wait for him to raise the matter of atmospheric CO2 levels of an astonishing, disastrous 400ppm and the fact that the level has been higher than 7000ppm in the past..... and see what the tards say...



We DO NOT need internationalism
We need nationalism, and we need the likes of Pauline and Malcolm....
Pauline not being able to verbalise like the trained liars, sorry, solicitors and banker making up the current cabinet, is no reason to cut her down.
Malcolm is obviously a very intelligent guy (He's an Engineer you see 8-) ) and I'm looking forward to this term, it will be very interesting, especially given that the government NEEDS one nation this time around :D

------------------

OK, I've said a bit there, dont just call me a Nazi and bolt.... disagree with some value adding :friends:
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Gwion » 06 Aug 2016, 11:42 am

I didn't call you a Nazi, i said there are parallels between One Nation and the Nazi Party.

You may have some valid points re: Nationalism and Internationalism. The only problem is that Nationalism as you describe above with protected boarders, industries, etc, is often used to mask an underlying racist and xenophobic route driver; exactly as it is in One Nation and the Nazi party. You can argue details as much as you like but that is the bare facts of the matter as recognised by the greater majority of the other 23.5 million Australians who did not vote for the Hansonites.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Chronos » 07 Aug 2016, 9:29 am

ON, the only party representing the Ugg boot wearing, southern cross tattoo getting, can drinking, Aussie pride stickered, '80's planted, Kingswood Country watching bogan segment of Australian society.

Thank Christ there's only 1/2 mil of them left, problem is they all have 5 snotty nosed mullet headed kids running around barefoot who'll probably grow up to vote ON, if ice addition doesn't get them first



Chronos
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2082
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by happyhunter » 07 Aug 2016, 5:33 pm

Hey mate, I wear uggies, did drive a Kingswood once, have tatts and ratty and still feel un represented by any political party... so f*&*^kit.. I'm taking my meat pie, football kangaroo and Holden car and f&*^&king off back to 1975 :D
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by Chronos » 07 Aug 2016, 7:21 pm

happyhunter wrote:Hey mate, I wear uggies, did drive a Kingswood once, have tatts and ratty and still feel un represented by any political party... so f*&*^kit.. I'm taking my meat pie, football kangaroo and Holden car and f&*^&king off back to 1975 :D


:lol: But you don't wear uggies to work do you?

Jus remember when you get there to start a SFFP branch and spread the word about the ****** coming. Hopefully when I hit "submit" and go to my safe I'll have a nice selection of semi auto risked, a 1911 in .45 and a hunting crossbow on the wall :thumbsup:

Chronos
User avatar
Chronos
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2082
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by crows2332 » 08 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm

Thanks Genesis93. Summed up my thoughts nearly to the letter.
Cheers
crows2332
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 37
Other

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by ebr love » 08 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm

Baronvonrort wrote:One of the problems we have is too many groups competing for our vote since we don't have huge numbers we need greater unity


Problem is our peak bodies don't want to share their little slice of the ego pie.

Won't collaborate much with anyone else doing good. Just want to do their thing.
TIKKA T3 TAC .300 WIN MAG
HOW SPORTER 270 WIN
HOWA YOUTH .204 RUGER
MARLIN 1889 .38-40
User avatar
ebr love
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 306
New South Wales

Re: Pauline on gun laws 1997

Post by safeshot » 16 Aug 2016, 7:21 pm

In the past two days in the SW of WA there have been "groups of people" throwing rocks at passing cars. Well, they are not people they are criminals. How there was not serious pile ups is a miracle.
No news on prosecutions yet. I mention this as deaths by moron don't get much of a rating as Sr. Hanson said about the road toll.
"Behave well. Think for the best. Speak kindly."
safeshot
Private
Private
 
Posts: 91
Western Australia


Back to top
 
Return to National gun laws - Australian Federal gun laws