Is anyone watching this stuff. Wasp files.

[fussy]

Well, the good news is, it's nearly 30 years, so the embargo will be up and soon all the evidence will be produced for us to see in the cold light of day.

Just kidding, they'll find an excuse not to release it.

Hey, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear", right? That's what they keep telling us.

You are out of the loop mate.. The files were meant to be released next year in 2026 but 3 years ago they added on another 70 years. making it 100 years total. So in 2096 they will be released when everybody is long dead and the event is forgotten.

It was announced when they converted all the evidence into digital format. Only the Tasmanian police commissioner has authority to see the files before the release date.

Yes, a touch or irony/sarcasm in my comment...

Meanwhile, here's our chance:
It's been nearly 30 years, so tell your local LNP candidart that if they want the voters to come back to them (they do), simply advocate to lift the PA files embargo.
Make it not about guns, but gov accountability.
Political mileage can be made by apologising to stolen generations for stuff that happened before your time, so the LNO can throw John Howard under a bus and say, "New Improved LNP, Stalin is dead, trust us..."
Drop a line to your local member +/- LNP candidate.

Be prepared for a phone call from the WL branch...

[alexjones]

I had no idea that tin foil hats could restrict blood flow to the brain.
Are you people serious.
"The gubberment sent a crack team of commandos to PA for the assassination of innocent people so they could restrict semi automatic rifles"
What the f*** are you all smoking?
We have no rights to firearms, they can ban anything they like with a stroke of the pen.

Yeah that’s one of the more loony ones out there. Our own soldiers are not going to shoot our civilians, children included. Not what they signed up for.
Unfortunately I think the really loony tunes stuff means whenever people do question the official version it’s easy to dismiss them as someone who buys into all that.
Much falls into the possible but highly unlikely category. But some questions still remain I think.
And this additional 75 year cover up isn’t really helpful in debunking the theories. It does suggest there’s something to hide.

And to your second question. I’m smoking something that will apparently harm my child during pregnancy and there’s a photo of some bloke with Aids on the packet.

You know Australian soldiers are humans right? Humans do things for money. The Australian soldier as the collective would not but the INDIVIDUAL would.

We know they would because it is documented that they have done many underworld contracts for money.

[Wapiti]

I don't believe any of it. I think that channel is whacko city.
Just like anything in the media, it's all narrative distorted. Bryant shot innocent people, simple, and we were punished by politicians who act however they see popular sentiment for their own benefit.
And personal fears.

You don't believe any of it? So you believe all the questions about the case have answers. Ok.

You realise the maker of the series Paul Moder just wants answers to the unanswered questions right?

He wants the evidence files released to answer these questions.

He has said before Bryant could be guilty but release the files to answer all the abnormalities with the case.

No mate I just don't believe any of this.

I also think, no matter what evil evidence files are released whether than tomorrow, or in 70 years, people will say it was modified, made up or changed to hide some imagined conspiracy.

And on the eyewitness reports, two people who see traumatic events (let alone more like at PA) very often and quite expectedly can have completely different views of what they saw with their own eyes, even from the same advantage points. Quite often we hear about this from violent occurrences when people are brought into ED's or when police attend to take statements.

Plus, add to that people just making stuff up because they are life-long conspiracy theorists, and the gullible people who will believe anything to find a reason for it all.

All of this just divides people and drives agenda. None of it benefits a firearms owner.

[MG5150]

Even assuming one of the headshed in SAS was behind it all I can't imagine a way to orchestrate a pair of helicopters colliding on command, unless one of the pilots was happy to sacrifice himself, and a bunch of his mates for the coverup.

You shoot down both helicopters and tell the public it was a crash...

[Wapiti]

You blokes have to be kidding....

[womble]

The Jews shot down the helicopters with space lazers

[Oldbloke]

I had no idea that tin foil hats could restrict blood flow to the brain.
Are you people serious.
"The gubberment sent a crack team of commandos to PA for the assassination of innocent people so they could restrict semi automatic rifles"
What the f*** are you all smoking?
We have no rights to firearms, they can ban anything they like with a stroke of the pen.

I'm with you.

20200327_171929.jpg (38.48 KiB) Viewed 170 times

[womble]

[bladeracer]

Even assuming one of the headshed in SAS was behind it all I can't imagine a way to orchestrate a pair of helicopters colliding on command, unless one of the pilots was happy to sacrifice himself, and a bunch of his mates for the coverup.

You shoot down both helicopters and tell the public it was a crash...

And do that much damage to our elite forces? Just nonsense. If one of the troopers had to be kept silent there were far simpler ways of doing it during a live-fire night training exercise. If you're suggesting a larger contingent of the men on those choppers were involved that had to be kept silent, I can't buy that at all.

[Wapiti]

20200327_171929.jpg

[/quote]

Dreamworld city. Elite forces. Deliberate accidents. My mates in the SAS told me. FMD.

C'mon guys.

[Oldbloke]

Some of the posts have gone from, silly, to just plain stupid.

[straightshooter]

We have no rights to firearms, they can ban anything they like with a stroke of the pen.

Well the reality is we don't have any "rights" whatsoever, we only have privileges granted to us by the state.
Anything can be banned, forbidden or criminalised.
Anything that was once extralegal can be made illegal.
Anything that was once illegal can be made legal.
Each state will have in it's constitution words similar to a clause in the NSW constitution which will effectively say the state can pass a law for any purpose whatsoever.