by Wapiti » 06 Sep 2025, 6:39 am
Firstly Womble, thanks for putting that up.
Couple of things here, it always appals me that hunters haven't been given the opportunity to undertake in government land hunting. A great system exists in NSW with the SF hunting, a proven system. Of course then, in Victoria. OK, I'm a Queenslander where we aren't allowed this type of thing, but I've seen for myself how this basically fuels and underpins many businesses in Vic country towns. And feeds the families of real, down to earth people. The kind of people who make Australia.
I've been invited twice by the Qld Govt to write up submissions on/about a national park I share a boundary with, on the Qld "dingo fence", in which deer, pigs and feral dogs multiply and cause landholding businesses all sorts of financial and stock issues. I've recommended the NSW system tor licensed hunters to be able to attend this wilderness park (plenty of 4WD tracks and camping areas already exist) but both times only ever get an acknowledgement of submission, never any indication anyone is listening.
It just doesn't suit their narrative. Basically of giving hunters more justification and genuine need to justify owning firearms for recreation and the purpose of perhaps feeding their families and ease the cost-of-living burden that they, the governments in Aus, are inflicting on the people through their mismanagement and what's quite obvious, evil intent on controlling every aspect of our lives.
Problem is, running states and a country requires the people entrusted in doing so, be bona-fide, proven business managers from all fields, coming from proven practical fields such as economics, defence, manufacturing etc.
But no, the public vote in useless, political activist trash from either side of politics, professional liars, backstabbers and con-artists that are there purely from a narcissistic personality, people who otherwise would be nothings in society.
Those that have the skills are held back and belittled or told to tow the political line, or lose their plum jobs.
In other words, they cannot and will not see the benefit of the people, "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours", as in hunters doing the work for them.
But no, how dare we give the gun owners more justification to prove how they can solve this problem for us?
That clown from the so-called "deerstalkers assn" who says, aerial shooting has it's place but... No it f**king doesn't, because the alternatives HAVE NOT been tried or even considered, you stupid peabrain.
Imagine if the petrified of the public monsters in government actually had a system of promoting hunting, had so for years and hunters had been gathering healthy, natural protein from these forests for years? The story WOULD NOT need to include expensive, ineffective aerial shooting.
And here I'm going to upset some people, but that SFP NSW clown and his innuendos, unproven accusations and basically, terrible effort in debate in that political representation. I shook my head at him discrediting himself and then post up the video in some perverse self-destructive move. Is that the best that they can find?
"The only way to avoid criticism is to do nothing, say nothing, and be nothing."
Aristotle.
Regards G,
AKA Dr. Doolittle