GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine gun

News and events in the media and political arena relating to firearms.

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by adam » 20 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm

Baronvonrort wrote:It would be criminal of the government to destroy something they could get $15K for.


They could have exported and sold the guns they purchased and destroyed in '93 off all the LFO's too...

When it comes to government - they know it's our money not theirs and they don't give a damn...
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 20 Nov 2015, 4:54 pm

adam wrote:
Baronvonrort wrote:It would be criminal of the government to destroy something they could get $15K for.


They could have exported and sold the guns they purchased and destroyed in '93 off all the LFO's too...

When it comes to government - they know it's our money not theirs and they don't give a damn...


When our government (VIC) spend $8,000Million+ on a big white elephant that looks something like a desal plant......
I dont think they'd be concerned about 15k...
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by anthillinside » 20 Nov 2015, 6:49 pm

<<Genesis93>> wrote:
adam wrote:
Baronvonrort wrote:It would be criminal of the government to destroy something they could get $15K for.


They could have exported and sold the guns they purchased and destroyed in '93 off all the LFO's too...

When it comes to government - they know it's our money not theirs and they don't give a damn...


When our government (VIC) spend $8,000Million+ on a big white elephant that looks something like a desal plant......
I dont think they'd be concerned about 15k...

And continue to pay it's running costs when it hasn't put a single drop of water into our water system..
Ahh while I'm thinking about it, they wouldn't need to pay to destroy the buyback guns, they could fill that big empty pipeline they built to carry water.
AND Mr. Andrews is currently touring drought affected farmers in Vic ???? now WHO said that "This will make Victoria drought proof”
Now I remember it was out last LABOR Premier. :evil: :thumbsdown:
There's always room for at least one more gun in my safe.
There's always room for one more safe in my house.
User avatar
anthillinside
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 375
Victoria

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 20 Nov 2015, 7:00 pm

but we have a short memory... which prospective labor leader campaigned with signs and all that proclaiming that he would never introdice tolls on the east link? what, you've forgotten? Bracksie of course... gets voted in and bammmo tolls! we forget.

and Danni Boy and the not worth the paper its written on.... wont pay a cent translates to NOW 600 odd million??? more?? These bastards should be held accountable.Period.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by anthillinside » 20 Nov 2015, 7:12 pm

You aint kidding.
It goes back even further, Joan Kerner just HAD to sell the State Bank at bargin buzzard prices because they loaded it with debt.
And now I hear some of the people who voted for him saying "I really wanted the tunnel, I never thought he would cancel it"
Well I hope your awake now!
But then again who beleives ANYTHING any Pollitician says before an election
There's always room for at least one more gun in my safe.
There's always room for one more safe in my house.
User avatar
anthillinside
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 375
Victoria

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 20 Nov 2015, 7:25 pm

hahahaha

They spend at least 12 years driving policy that densifies ALL suburbs from the CBD out to the green belt, practically requiring many backyards to be subdivided for an extra 2 families, not to mention medium rise developments in out suburbs FFS....... THEN refuse to build road that get those extra families around the joint in a reasonable time....

The trouble is these mongrels have got it made, because the electors have such a short memory.... after a cycle they'll be voted back in... and they know it.
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by anthillinside » 21 Nov 2015, 9:27 am

Yeah, Though I agree that a lot of people have short memories there's enough that don't.
Problem is "Two Party Prefered" it doesn't matter what we remember or how bad they were "last time" just that the "current lot" need to go so ... Hey let's play leap frog.
As you said hey "know" they are going to get back in.
There's always room for at least one more gun in my safe.
There's always room for one more safe in my house.
User avatar
anthillinside
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 375
Victoria

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by adam » 21 Nov 2015, 10:53 am

Should I be concerned. I just realised:

Terrorists use fear to try and win people over...

Main stream political parties use fear (of the other party) to try and win people over...

Now before someone jumps on me - I'm not accusing politicians of being terrorists. Just pointing out that those who don't have any real attraction to them seem to have to use fear to win.

Independents are becoming more and more attractive every election!
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by Title_II » 22 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm

We have greater than 275,000 civilian transferable machineguns in America. Somewhere between a hundred thousand more than that, and maybe a million.

How many people have been murdered with these machineguns since the 1934 National Firearms Act? One for sure, a Cop used his personal MG to murder someone. One possible but unconfirmed.

Let's call it two. Two people. It's probably only one, by a cop, but it seems like a fair number after 80 years.

How many people have been murdered by ILLEGAL MGs in America?

Less than were in a season of Miami Vice. During the Roaring 80s most major cities, or any place for that matter, found one MG and none were connected to a crime.

Bloomdouche as NYC (******) mayor wanted an AK47 for a press conference. He requested it from the 5 boroughs of NYC, that probably have more cops than all of Australia. There wasn't a single AK47, SEMI-auto, in any of their evidence rooms. It was also an illegal firearm in NYC. He had to send his cops to "borrow" one from a gun dealer so he could bring it to the press conference and use it as a prop to show that these guns were "out on the street" or "police face them everyday" or whatever other bulls**t a mayor title and a billion dollars buys you.
User avatar
Title_II
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1430
United States of America

Re: GCA - explain this: Man carrying fully auto sub-machine

Post by sarki » 23 Nov 2015, 10:54 am

<<Genesis93>> wrote:When our government (VIC) spend $8,000Million+ on a big white elephant that looks something like a desal plant......
I dont think they'd be concerned about 15k...


Is that meant to be 800 million or 8 billion?
Dear Santa,
Please bring me a Desert Tactical Arms SRS-A1 Rifle in .338 Lapua Magnum.
I'll be good with it, I promise!
User avatar
sarki
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 153
New South Wales

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Firearms related media and politics