BangWhizzClack wrote:wanneroo wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:That is the purpose of the second amendment. It's not for hunting, sporting or home protection. It's to allow the people to effectively rise up and defeat tyrannical regimes.
That is the main purpose. It's a check on out of control government.
Just the past 100 years is litered with irrefutable examples of government tyranny slaughtering millions of defenseless citizens.
It also plays it's role in national defense. Would much of WW2 happened if citizens of countries that got invaded were all armed with AR-15s? I think not.
Switzerland let everyone know in WW1 and WW2 that there is an accurate rifle behind every blade of grass and nobody messed with Switzerland.
Spot on, and personally I'd say the US Government has demonstrated it's tyrannical practices and is well overdue for a rebellion. However, I'm terrified of what would result of it if the Woke Brigade had the opportunity to gain traction in new foundations. Many are too soft to effectively make change.
Oldbloke wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:wanneroo wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:That is the purpose of the second amendment. It's not for hunting, sporting or home protection. It's to allow the people to effectively rise up and defeat tyrannical regimes.
That is the main purpose. It's a check on out of control government.
Just the past 100 years is litered with irrefutable examples of government tyranny slaughtering millions of defenseless citizens.
It also plays it's role in national defense. Would much of WW2 happened if citizens of countries that got invaded were all armed with AR-15s? I think not.
Switzerland let everyone know in WW1 and WW2 that there is an accurate rifle behind every blade of grass and nobody messed with Switzerland.
Spot on, and personally I'd say the US Government has demonstrated it's tyrannical practices and is well overdue for a rebellion. However, I'm terrified of what would result of it if the Woke Brigade had the opportunity to gain traction in new foundations. Many are too soft to effectively make change.
I guess your just the bloke to lead a rebellion. Best you should catch the next flight and go lead a rebellion then. Ziege can be your lieutenant.
Because you and ziege have achieved SFA with your constant fanatical tirades here.
Me I exercise my right to vote. Seems you boys would prefer to start some sort of civil war. Go do it else where. Perhaps to the "Iand where you are free to shoot people in schools and shopping centres."
BangWhizzClack wrote:
Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
Oldbloke wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:
Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
After reading that I think your just a smart alec kid.
Only a child would speak of war and dieing in such a flipent manner. Go back to school little boy. And come back in 15 years when you have some real life experience and a family to support.
BangWhizzClack wrote:Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
womble wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
Should you die the corporate billionaires that sponsored your war against liberty and justice for all will not recognise your service.
Should you survive you would spend the rest of your life in a detention camp, probably Guatomeno.
We won’t take you back and your citizenship here would be revoked.
You’d be left stateless indefinitely.
You have no allegiance to the southern cross so somehow i highly doubt you know any soldiers.
You have no allegiance to the USA, the republic for which it stands, one nation under God indivisible.
You’ve been bought and paid for and now you’re just disposable. All just to keep off shore corporate hedge funds safe from taxes. And low wages for the working classes.
No1_49er wrote:Another thread that has descended into a morass of invective which has nothing to do with the thread title.
Some of you here, who would have us believe that you are oh so knowledgeable in the ways of the world and the foibles of its inhabitants, sure don't act the age which one might ascribe to you.
Time to grow up, CHILDREN
BangWhizzClack wrote:Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
BangWhizzClack wrote:
Not to lead it, but I'd certainly fight and die if the civil war kicks off. I'd kill and die for it over there, you guys really don't seem worthy of such sacrifice, nor are your children.
Robin wrote:I enjoy shooting as much as the next guy/girl, however if I was a politician and I was reading this post, I would be saying no way to easing our gun laws, in fact, I might be inclined to make it tighter.
If you want the laws to make it easier to own better guns , you need to show why, resorting to violence is always going to be a red flag, calling others bad names is always going to be a red flag, having a civil conversation doesn't get noticed, however having no red flags will get noticed, its up to all of us gun owners to show that we are better then the people who are against them, it might not change much, but it goes along way to helping to make the change.
Put it this way, a politician is never going to make it easier if he/she believes that there is a chance of a another mass shooting, that will be his/her name going down in the history books as to allowing this to happen by making it easier.