Jandamurra wrote:@Wadeo6-How about reseraching the homicide rates in counties with strict gun control? Did you go to the link I posted?
It's incredibly limited and misleading to compare the US to Australia as if they're the only two countires in the world.
Here it is again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate
wade06 wrote:Compared with any other first world country (that i can see) the US has extremely high gun ownership levels, high murder rates, high gun murder rates, high gun suicides and high accidental gun deaths. Its not a coincidence.
Hypothetically, if every Australian house hold had a gun the murder rate, accidental death and suicide rates WOULD go up.
Again, i'm pro guns but i certainly don't want easy access to semi autos and hand guns in Australia.
wade06 wrote:Jandamurra wrote:@Wadeo6-How about reseraching the homicide rates in counties with strict gun control? Did you go to the link I posted?
It's incredibly limited and misleading to compare the US to Australia as if they're the only two countires in the world.
Here it is again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate
Thanks for the table.... it is rather interesting. Lets just look at some first world countries murder rate per 100k to make things fairer.
US 3.9 ( think its a bit higher but will run with your link)
Canada 1.4
France 1.2
Denmark 1.0
Australia 1.0
Sweden 0.9
Germany 0.9
UK 0.9
NZ 0.9
Italy 0.8
Norway 0.6
Japan 0.3
The US murder rate is substantially higher (3-5x) than any other first world country (that i can see at a quick look) which is from a range of issues.
However you would reasonably expect that gun murders would be proportional to the increased death rate if your argument was true i.e. 4x. However gun homicides are 21x higher in the US than Australia.... but surely that isn't because there are more guns in the US![]()
In 2014 Australia had 0.16 gun homicides per 100,000... the US had 3.43 gun homicides per 100,000.... that's 21x higher
In 2014 Australia had 0.93 gun deaths per 100,000... the US had 10.54 gun deaths per 100,000.... that's 11x higher
In the US about 70% of murders are committed with a gun..... in Australia its about 15%... probably not a coincidence their murder rate AND gun murder rate are higher in the US is it?
Re your gang analogy... if i really wanted to rob someone and knew they had a gun i'd shoot them before they had a chance to use it. If gun access here was easy (handguns in particular) then many crims would certainly get one... not sure how that helps the majority of law abiding Australian citizens who don't want/need a gun on the off chance they "had to" blow a bad guy away because they were stealing their wallet??
Title_II wrote:If you carry a fun in Australia you will go to jail.
David Brown wrote:Concerning? Why would that be?
Seriously, even the shooting community here has become normalised to this kind of fear.
We go to the USA a lot, this year 6+ weeks total. and average that for the last 10. I never feel uneasy except in Dallas, New Orleans, New York and LA when I am not carrying or someone I am with is not carrying, then yeah......but the rest of the USA is awesome and I always feel safe around firearms and ranges. The people you meet are awesome and not to be frightened of.
Maybe I have misunderstood your post but really the American people have a crime problem not a firearm problem. It is us here in Australia that have a firearm problem......we just do not have a 2nd amendment or similar.
doc wrote:
I disagree.
The American constitution gives citizens the rights to bear arms. America has been what it has been because of it's entire foundation. America is worse off with the attempts to move away from it's foundation over the last half century or so...
My personal opinion (and it's just that), is that the optimum solution is somewhere between America and Australia. Allow anyone who is fit and proper to have the right to firearms. No genuine reason required, but deny criminals. And I suspect that many Americans would like to see criminals denied legal access to firearms, but I know there are big problems with that ideology.
One of the issues is that we know politicians won't stop there. They take a small piece, and then they want more, until they want total control.
Another problem is the ability for the government to redefine who is a 'fit and proper' person. So easily what was originally called freedom of speech and someone's own opinion which was fine for centuries is now being redefined as 'hate speech'. Someone could be considered a fine citizen a couple of decade ago, and by remaining the same person with the same opinions they've always had, they are bigots now.
How easy then would it be for the government to also redefine people who don't agree with their ideologies as no longer fit and proper as well.
We've seen it happen here in Australia (first with the registry and the promise that it wouldn't be used to take guns off us - and then the confiscation), and now still not satisfied the push for more, more MORE! And then they change the definition of genuine reason to remove one of the most genuine (self defense)....
The reason I believe that the NRA and American's aren't budging an inch is because they know if they do - the government will take that inch, then take a mile and still not be satisfied. Australia is living proof of that. Even if the NRA wanted to give the government just a little and secretly agreed with some of the points being made, they know that it would be disastrous in the long run.
The last thing America needs is to follow in Australia's footsteps - especially with the amount of firearms already in circulation. This would just leave the innocent defenseless, and the criminals with the majority of the firearms.
wade06 wrote:Re your gang analogy... if i really wanted to rob someone and knew they had a gun i'd shoot them before they had a chance to use it. If gun access here was easy (handguns in particular) then many crims would certainly get one... not sure how that helps the majority of law abiding Australian citizens who don't want/need a gun on the off chance they "had to" blow a bad guy away because they were stealing their wallet??
wanneroo wrote:If you were a gang member that did that how long do you think you'd survive? Most gang bangers are terrible shots and us that carry tend to be firearms enthusiasts and can probably shoot better.
I carry full size handguns like my Glock 17 on my person all the time and no bystander would have any idea I am carrying. We have a whole developed industry here in the USA catering to the carry market with holsters and carry systems.
Gwion wrote:As an Australian, I am not 'institutionalised into thinking big government knows best'. I simply appreciate the cultural differences between Australia and the US and am sick to death of the cultural hi-jacking of our country by American culture. We have not needed American style gun laws historically and I don't see we need them going forward. We may need to find our own workable balance but the US is NOT an example I admire or aspire to.
I won't tell you the US should be more Australian and I would appreciate the same in return,
wanneroo wrote: Quite frankly here in the USA we are very welcoming to Australians and their culture and sport and many Australians have sought their fame and fortune here with no barriers to their entry or success. I know first hand it doesn't go the other way, but so it goes.
wanneroo wrote:Gwion wrote:As an Australian, I am not 'institutionalised into thinking big government knows best'. I simply appreciate the cultural differences between Australia and the US and am sick to death of the cultural hi-jacking of our country by American culture. We have not needed American style gun laws historically and I don't see we need them going forward. We may need to find our own workable balance but the US is NOT an example I admire or aspire to.
I won't tell you the US should be more Australian and I would appreciate the same in return,
You might not feel institutionalized into big government but many Australians are, especially in the realm of firearms and legislating the size, shape, function, use of them as well as the bureaucratic hoops to jump through for licences and storage.
You almost might be sick to death of "cultural hijacking" but since people are individuals we must leave it to them to decide what culture they choose to imbibe in, as long as it causes no harm to others. Quite frankly here in the USA we are very welcoming to Australians and their culture and sport and many Australians have sought their fame and fortune here with no barriers to their entry or success. I know first hand it doesn't go the other way, but so it goes.
Title_II wrote:If you carry a fun in Australia you will go to jail.
Gwion wrote:wanneroo wrote: Quite frankly here in the USA we are very welcoming to Australians and their culture and sport and many Australians have sought their fame and fortune here with no barriers to their entry or success. I know first hand it doesn't go the other way, but so it goes.
Sophistry and tripe!
There are a HEAP of Americans that make their homes and careers in Australia. They are accepted as any other and probably have more opportunity in Australia than migrants from many other areas. What is not accepted is assertion of US culture being superior and supreme. This may be where you ran aground, if you claim to have personal experience to the contrary.
If Australian culture and sport is so well acknowledged and accepted, why is it that the vast majority of Americans wouldn't know the difference between Australia & Austria?
As for choosing a culture to follow, we have an entire generation that has had no choice because of the cultural saturation of US content in our media and entertainment.
David Brown wrote:wanneroo
Great posts![]()
I note you picked on my crime problem. That seems to be, and I should be more specific related to certain demographics in the few areas we all know about.
I am with you buddyI would move there in a heartbeat given the right circumstances. And might just do it yet anyway.
Be back again in a few weeks......There are a couple of thousand rounds waiting for us
Gwion wrote:Not as institutionalised as Americans, who are brain washed from birth to believe their country and culture are the pinnacle of human existence when in fact their culture is the biggest contradiction to their own proclaimed and institutionalised doctrines.
wanneroo wrote:Gwion wrote:Not as institutionalised as Americans, who are brain washed from birth to believe their country and culture are the pinnacle of human existence when in fact their culture is the biggest contradiction to their own proclaimed and institutionalised doctrines.
Yes we do have some cultural rot from being unmoored from our constitutional principles, but our founding fathers had some unique ideas about freedom and it's lead to the greatest era of technological development the earth has ever seen. So yes it is the pinnacle of human existence and that is what happens when you have freedom and liberty and the individual is allowed to be the best they can be. The facts can't be denied.
Sounds like you need to spend some time with more Americans and spend some time in the USA and turn the Foxtel off.
Gwion wrote:What I also object to is the loud mouth yank who comes over here, bellowing about how good America is and how WE NEED to be more like them. I have also met a HEAP of those!