Gaznazdiak wrote:bigfellascott wrote:It's just more Faceache dribble posted on a shooting forum I reckon.
It was a tongue in cheek go at politics and the media in the Politics and Media section of the shooting forum.
If that's too complicated for you, no worries, I'll see if I can find some knock-knock jokes for you.
bigfellascott wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:bigfellascott wrote:It's just more Faceache dribble posted on a shooting forum I reckon.
It was a tongue in cheek go at politics and the media in the Politics and Media section of the shooting forum.
If that's too complicated for you, no worries, I'll see if I can find some knock-knock jokes for you.
I think you'll find that the Media and Politics section is more for firearms related media stories etc not this type of dribble you keep posting about which really belongs on Faceache where everyone is perpetually offended about everything!
Wombat wrote:Knock Knock
Who cares
Gaznazdiak wrote:bigfellascott wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:bigfellascott wrote:It's just more Faceache dribble posted on a shooting forum I reckon.
It was a tongue in cheek go at politics and the media in the Politics and Media section of the shooting forum.
If that's too complicated for you, no worries, I'll see if I can find some knock-knock jokes for you.
I think you'll find that the Media and Politics section is more for firearms related media stories etc not this type of dribble you keep posting about which really belongs on Faceache where everyone is perpetually offended about everything!
Since you're so easily offended by my contributions, best you don't read them then.
If you see a new thread with my name on it, just ignore it, like I try to do with any of yours.
bullzeye wrote:Don’t care.
I’d still vote for him if I lived in his electorate.
Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Gwion wrote:Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Actually adds to the insult if you are directing it at someone, I reckon.
bullzeye wrote:Don’t care.
I’d still vote for him if I lived in his electorate.
Gaznazdiak wrote:bullzeye wrote:Don’t care.
I’d still vote for him if I lived in his electorate.
Which is exactly why we have a parliament full of dead wood.
Gaznazdiak wrote:Gwion wrote:Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Actually adds to the insult if you are directing it at someone, I reckon.
Exactly.
The best insult you can give someone is one you know they are too ignorant to understand.
Sauce on the burger.
Stix wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:Gwion wrote:Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Actually adds to the insult if you are directing it at someone, I reckon.
Exactly.
The best insult you can give someone is one you know they are too ignorant to understand.
Sauce on the burger.
Hmmm...yea...but not always...
Ive seen the attempt at big worded intellectual insult backfire on the odd person...depending on circumstances & surroundings of course, but ive seen when what they say makes no sense to anyone & they are made to look the crazy fool by a group & have to walk away red faced...
Sauce is always good on your burger, but you don't want to end up the sloppy pickle...
Gwion wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:bullzeye wrote:Don’t care.
I’d still vote for him if I lived in his electorate.
Which is exactly why we have a parliament full of dead wood.
My thoughts exactly.
Although Barnaby's wood apparently isn't dead!
bullzeye wrote:Don’t care.
I’d still vote for him if I lived in his electorate.
Blackened wrote:Deleted the name calling, and all the childish bulls**t.
Those this is relevant towards will know who they are.
Have a mature conversation, or be removed.
First / final / period. Next time it's a ban without warning.
Gaznazdiak wrote:Gwion wrote:Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Actually adds to the insult if you are directing it at someone, I reckon.
Exactly.
The best insult you can give someone is one you know they are too ignorant to understand.
Sauce on the burger.
Wombat wrote:Gaznazdiak wrote:Gwion wrote:Wombat wrote:Which kind of defeats the purpose of an insult.
Actually adds to the insult if you are directing it at someone, I reckon.
Exactly.
The best insult you can give someone is one you know they are too ignorant to understand.
Sauce on the burger.
If your purpose in delivering said insult is to stroke your ego then yes.
If it is to deliver a message clearly and succinctly being indecipherable to the recipient is a failure at best, cowardly at worst.
I dont see the purpose in delivering a message that is not understood It does nothing to elucidate the recipient regarding the issue at hand.
Oldbloke wrote:Q. Are you aware of why Barnaby Joyce is like IKEA?
A: One screw in the wrong place and the whole cabinet falls apart!