bigfellascott wrote:400 odd firearms seized today down in Cooma from a Dealer.
gordicans wrote:I wonder more about the entire cost in taxpayer dollars and wasted Police man hours enforcing ludicrous punitive laws ...
bigfellascott wrote:400 odd firearms seized today down in Cooma from a Dealer.
JSS wrote:bladeracer wrote:JSS wrote:I'm not saying they don't waste money, and are we the primary source of illegal guns, no, but i can tell you for a fact legal guns get stolen, when i was 20 (so way back before the safe storage laws) i was at a mates house when a bloke came over trying to sell two 22's and a 12g pumpy that he somehow ended up with that were stolen from some poor bastard. We told him to f@ck off and never come back. I also had my place broken into once many years ago before the safe storage laws and i had 4 guns under the bed, if they had of checked under the bed there would be 4 more illegal guns floating around out there, so don't try to tell me that unsecured guns don't get stolen because they do.
It may not be the violent criminals stealing them, it's the dead sh!ts and junkies breaking into houses, but everything they steal ends up back at the drug dealers house being swapped for drugs, so yes they eventually do end up in the hands of the not so nice.
If your guns are not secure and the cops take them then suck sh!t you got what you deserve. And don't worry they're spending plenty of money to combat violent crime and i'm sure a large chunk of that is being wasted too.
Like Tassie said how many legal guns in safes were taken? The answer would be NONE.
We have plenty of gun restrictions/laws here that suck, but the safe storage laws aren't one of them.
Of course firearms get stolen, anything can be stolen, and will be. But having your firearm stolen makes you a victim of crime, not a perpetrator of it. Gun safes do not prevent firearms from being stolen, if you follow some Facebok groups, victims of theft post photos of their gun safes that have been cut or smashed open, or stolen intact and dumped after being emptied. And as a tiny percentage of stolen firearms are recovered from criminals, usually not as part of violent crime, why should you be held responsible for "allowing" your firearm to be stolen, any more so than being held responsible for anything of yours being stolen, sold, and the money used to buy illegal guns or drugs that will be used to kill people? Stop thinking of yourself as a criminal in waiting, as GCA keep telling the public we are.
I don't think anybody disagrees that we should keep our firearms locked up, they're expensive, but nobody should be criminalised for deciding how they prefer to protect their assets. The only effect it has on society is in keeping guns out of the hands of Green morons, like Tim Winton (who would sit in his house as a kid, with his dad's rifle, sighting on people in his neighbourhood), or the Green politicians (I can't recall the name of the moron who tried to kill his brother when he found a handgun left in the bathroom by a family acquaintance ). The people who don't want us to have firearms are driven by their own experiences of stupidity, no moral compass, and zero self discipline - they simply assume the whole population is as reckless and stupid as they know themselves to be.
I agree with you mate, but what you were saying before and what i replied to was that inspections were a waste of resources and money and are picking on us lafos and that stolen guns are all GCA bullsh!t and i disagree.
The way licencing and ptas and registration is setup has already been proven to be an ineffective over complicated expensive waste of time & money, but the small part of it that is a couple of plods coming out to check that our stuff is stored properly is very inexpensive and good value for money for them. A hour or twos wages for 1 or 2 plods to go to a house and check that x amount of guns are safe and where they should be is nothing compared to tracking down stolen and otherwise illegally obtained guns.
Like i've repeatedly said if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of who gives a F@ck if they want to come & have a look?? The guys whinging about inspections carry on more like "victims" than anyone, "oh no they want to look at my guns oh i'm being oppressed poor poor me" What a load of tinfoil hat bullsh!t.
Enjoy your guns, fight the anti's, jump the occasional hoop, smile for the inspections and have fun the other 99.99% of the time. Life's not that hard.
bladeracer wrote:bigrich wrote:geez blade , if what you've said is true about those green party nutters , that's very worrying that these people are trying to have a say in politics in our country
those facts are very disturbing. i've often thought that the people who speak out against gun ownership seem to be the type of people who shouldn't be allowed to own them ......
They are self-published admissions, whether the tellers can be trusted to recognize truth, I sincerely doubt, but both statements were made in attacks against lawful firearm owners, so clearly indicate how these people view the rest of us.
JSS wrote:trekin wrote:JSS wrote:So what? If you're gear is stored safely then who cares if you get an inspection? Is having a couple of coppers turn up to your house for a short while really that big of an issue?
Oh the oppression and victimisation they must have felt, perhaps they need a hug.
And yet, one is left wondering just how much more of the 'actual problem' could have being fixed with the manpower and resources expended on these unnecessarly targeted inspections of LAFOs during an operation that was supposed to tackle the trafficking and use of illicit firearms.
I'm pretty sure weapons licencing aren't the ones running around kicking in doors with warrants taking guns off criminals, tracking internet sales of "solvent traps" or confiscating suppressors & guns/parts at customs. So while other branches are covering those avenues why shouldn't they go and check on some lafos as well.
My guess is they've figured out that perhaps some of the older blokes who didn't have to worry about safe storage for many years may just need to be checked on to keep their guns safe, and people with over 20 guns (which many of us are) might be considered targets for thieves. I don't really know what their thinking is but like i said who gives a f@ck if they come and check on us? If your guns are safe it's cost you nothing, and if they're not then cop it on the chin.
The article said they also confiscated a small amount of "unsecured ammo and firearms" which says to me that they were legal guns & ammo, so some of their as you put it "unnecessary targeted inspections" were in fact necessary.
I just don't get the mindset some people have about inspections. They come, smile & show em your guns, they go........what's the issue? They didn't kick your dog or shag your wife so who cares?
trekin wrote:Who, exactly are the "guys whinging about inspections" in this thread?
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of ", after reading some of the posts here, it appears that there are a few who do believe that they have something to hide, or maybe they're just ashamed at being law abiding in this upside down country.
trekin wrote:HMMM.... naive or gullible?? Either way, tis a pitty to see another taken hook, line and sinker by the Govt/media baiting programme.
bigrich wrote:+1 JSS , I live in suburbia and don’t tell the neighbors I’ve got firearms, I keep things out of sight by loading my gun cases in my vehicle in my side yard so people can’t sticky beak. There are opportunistic scumbags looking for a quick buck out there, I don’t make it easy for them
JSS wrote:trekin wrote:Who, exactly are the "guys whinging about inspections" in this thread?
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of ", after reading some of the posts here, it appears that there are a few who do believe that they have something to hide, or maybe they're just ashamed at being law abiding in this upside down country.
Considering your first two posts i'd say you., and given the our conversation i'd also say BR. Also how is not caring about an inspection being ashamed or having something to hide. It's the other way around mate you guys are the ones protesting about something that really doesn't matter. I bet you whinge when you get a speeding fine to and say the gov is out to get you.trekin wrote:HMMM.... naive or gullible?? Either way, tis a pitty to see another taken hook, line and sinker by the Govt/media baiting programme.
Between this and your comment above you sound about as rational and level headed as the nutjob antis. congratulations.
Oh i think aldi are having a special on tinfoil at the moment....you should hurry down there.
Anyway, you keep on fighting the good fight mate. I'm going to take my hook, line and sinker along with my shame filled law abiding self and pack my range bag, I've got some new toys to sight in & play with.
trekin wrote:Who, exactly are the "guys whinging about inspections" in this thread?
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of ", after reading some of the posts here, it appears that there are a few who do believe that they have something to hide, or maybe they're just ashamed at being law abiding in this upside down country.
TassieTiger wrote:Any stats on how many legally owned and registered firearms were actually stolen from safes ?
Oldbloke wrote:bigrich wrote:+1 JSS , I live in suburbia and don’t tell the neighbors I’ve got firearms, I keep things out of sight by loading my gun cases in my vehicle in my side yard so people can’t sticky beak. There are opportunistic scumbags looking for a quick buck out there, I don’t make it easy for them
Yep, I do the same. And I dont have "winchester" or "deer hunting" signs on my ute.
Oldbloke wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Any stats on how many legally owned and registered firearms were actually stolen from safes ?
We are never told that, are we?. Mmmmm I wonder why?
On the telly a while back, (abc i think) show about illegal drugs. They stated that less than 1% of shipping containers get xrayed. And no checks on any yachts & most shipping coming into the country.
So maybe safer to just ship them in in bulk!
JSS wrote:bladeracer wrote:JSS wrote:trekin wrote:JSS wrote:So what? If you're gear is stored safely then who cares if you get an inspection? Is having a couple of coppers turn up to your house for a short while really that big of an issue?
Oh the oppression and victimisation they must have felt, perhaps they need a hug.
And yet, one is left wondering just how much more of the 'actual problem' could have being fixed with the manpower and resources expended on these unnecessarly targeted inspections of LAFOs during an operation that was supposed to tackle the trafficking and use of illicit firearms.
I'm pretty sure weapons licencing aren't the ones running around kicking in doors with warrants taking guns off criminals, tracking internet sales of "solvent traps" or confiscating suppressors & guns/parts at customs. So while other branches are covering those avenues why shouldn't they go and check on some lafos as well.
My guess is they've figured out that perhaps some of the older blokes who didn't have to worry about safe storage for many years may just need to be checked on to keep their guns safe, and people with over 20 guns (which many of us are) might be considered targets for thieves. I don't really know what their thinking is but like i said who gives a f@ck if they come and check on us? If your guns are safe it's cost you nothing, and if they're not then cop it on the chin.
The article said they also confiscated a small amount of "unsecured ammo and firearms" which says to me that they were legal guns & ammo, so some of their as you put it "unnecessary targeted inspections" were in fact necessary.
I just don't get the mindset some people have about inspections. They come, smile & show em your guns, they go........what's the issue? They didn't kick your dog or shag your wife so who cares?
Do you actually believe the GCA bulls**t that LAFO's are the primary source of firearms used in gun crime? When you accept the truth, that violent criminals have zero interest in stealing our firearms, then perhaps you'll understand why it's a tragic waste of resources that should be directed elsewhere, where it can achieve measurable results against violent crime.
I'm not saying they don't waste money, and are we the primary source of illegal guns, no, but i can tell you for a fact legal guns get stolen, when i was 20 (so way back before the safe storage laws) i was at a mates house when a bloke came over trying to sell two 22's and a 12g pumpy that he somehow ended up with that were stolen from some poor bastard. We told him to f@ck off and never come back. I also had my place broken into once many years ago before the safe storage laws and i had 4 guns under the bed, if they had of checked under the bed there would be 4 more illegal guns floating around out there, so don't try to tell me that unsecured guns don't get stolen because they do.
It may not be the violent criminals stealing them, it's the dead sh!ts and junkies breaking into houses, but everything they steal ends up back at the drug dealers house being swapped for drugs, so yes they eventually do end up in the hands of the not so nice.
If your guns are not secure and the cops take them then suck sh!t you got what you deserve. And don't worry they're spending plenty of money to combat violent crime and i'm sure a large chunk of that is being wasted too.
Like Tassie said how many legal guns in safes were taken? The answer would be NONE.
We have plenty of gun restrictions/laws here that suck, but the safe storage laws aren't one of them.
TassieTiger wrote:Problem out there now - and I see it daily in my work - is that stats can be and are manipulated to what ever the end user wants...
Eg 1% of shipping containers are x rayed is not the way the govt would spin it.
They’d say, a very high number of containers coming into the country are checked and x rayed for illegal firearms. Of those containers checked, 99% are found to be clean (giving an indication of a much higher check ratio)...
bladeracer wrote:trekin wrote:Who, exactly are the "guys whinging about inspections" in this thread?
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of ", after reading some of the posts here, it appears that there are a few who do believe that they have something to hide, or maybe they're just ashamed at being law abiding in this upside down country.
I would hope, and trust that nobody on this forum has anything to hide, and I doubt any firearm owner feels any shame for abiding the stupid laws we're stuck with.
I also didn't notice anybody whinging about inspections, I must've missed that completely.
trekin wrote:bladeracer wrote:trekin wrote:Who, exactly are the "guys whinging about inspections" in this thread?
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of ", after reading some of the posts here, it appears that there are a few who do believe that they have something to hide, or maybe they're just ashamed at being law abiding in this upside down country.
I would hope, and trust that nobody on this forum has anything to hide, and I doubt any firearm owner feels any shame for abiding the stupid laws we're stuck with.
I also didn't notice anybody whinging about inspections, I must've missed that completely.
Well I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who thinks that I was not whinging, and using the 'victim card', about inspections. I put that question to JSS, as I also have not seen any whinging about inspections.
As for the "if we have nothing to hide or be ashamed of " comment, that was a tongue in cheek dig at those who comment about how careful they are in not letting their neighbors see them loading their guns into their cars, or not having shooting related stickers on their vehicles. Along the lines of "Oh, I have nothing to hide, and I make damn sure that no one sees that I have nothing to hide".
Stix wrote:I understand Trekkins point, but i dont see anything wrong with being discreet when loading firearms into car around the house BigRich...i, & im sure many do the same mate
There are far too many unscrupulous folk around these days that ive no doubt would happily target a house for not being home timetables...
And unfortunately, plenty of those types are attracted to "the more brazen the crime, the better" attitude...& those kunts dont need any encouragement...!!!
Not hiding the fact one is a proud lafo is distinctly different than having an extraverted egotistical arrogance when it comes to loading firearms into the car at home to advertise you're off for a few days to go shootin...