Member-Deleted wrote:Our legal system, as imperfect as it is at times, beats mob rule every time. It is what sets us apart from other nations and societies.
The defence lawyer's job is to mount a defence to the charges.
The prosector's job is to prove the charges, supported by evidence.
The judge/magistrate's job is to decide whether the prosecution did prove the allegations, beyond a reasonable doubt.
In every single criminal case [not just this one], you have the power and resources of the State versus one individual. That's why we have a presumption of innocence - "innocent until proven guilty" - and why everyone is entitled to a defence.
Were you there? Did you see it happen? Then how do you know the accused is guilty? Because the police say so? Yeah, ok.
I'm not sticking up for this bloke [he might be the biggest grub in the world], I'm suggesting that in all criminal cases we should at least have a fair trial before we go straight to the lynching.
Spot on, except for one point, it is judge/magistrate's (depending on the level of unlawfulness), or a jury of your peers, job is to decide whether the prosecution did prove the allegations, beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge/magistrate's job is to hand down punisments prescriped for said breaches.