Sarco wrote:Ahhhh,
No comments from SA members.
Does this mean that in SA it is considered a non-event?
AussieCapitalist wrote:Ok just reading the SA laws and suck me sideways it is legal.
bigrich wrote:AussieCapitalist wrote:Ok just reading the SA laws and suck me sideways it is legal.
if this is the case, that this requirement has always been part of the act/liscencing , where's the conspiracy
i'm all for trying to protect our rights , but the WLB are within their rights to request a audit .
a lawyer could take on the case, but i'm sure he's the only one who will win , $$$$$
AussieCapitalist wrote:I really find the response staggering. Its almost as if forum members have been asleep for the past nearly 30 years. It is obvious what is going on seeing as past performance is a good indicator of future performance and we know what the agenda is. We need a bit more lead in the pencil and hopefully we see some more legal challenges.
Sergeant Hartman wrote:
Mate you need to chill the French down... ohh look your shadow is a conspiracy by the sun to steal your soul
Maybe all members are chilling because there is nothing there to see, abs you are freaking out over nothing
AussieCapitalist wrote:I think this thread has done its day you can lock it admin man. The people of SA are going to get self audited and they love it. I will dig up this thread when the time comes and said I told you all so.
AussieCapitalist wrote:I think this thread has done its day you can lock it admin man. The people of SA are going to get self audited and they love it. I will dig up this thread when the time comes and said I told you all so.
bigrich wrote:
AC , i welcome veiws and opinions (that's what forums are for ) ,different to my own as a way of getting a second opinion on my own views. things are always changing, the beurocrats are making more rules to control our lives/rights every year. it' how they justify their own jobs don't stop commenting or discussing just because others may not agree
on my 1967 valiant i had, seatbelts were optional , and rego was a voluntary thing through auto clubs back in the day . times have changed. if any forum members are concerned about preserving their rights, join a more pro-active firearms group like shooters union , or NFC . that's what i've done . less than a carton of beer for a years membership
bigrich wrote:AC , i welcome veiws and opinions (that's what forums are for ) ,different to my own as a way of getting a second opinion on my own views. things are always changing, the beurocrats are making more rules to control our lives/rights every year. it' how they justify their own jobs don't stop commenting or discussing just because others may not agree
on my 1967 valiant i had, seatbelts were optional , and rego was a voluntary thing through auto clubs back in the day . times have changed. if any forum members are concerned about preserving their rights, join a more pro-active firearms group like shooters union , or NFC . that's what i've done . less than a carton of beer for a years membership
AussieCapitalist wrote:bigrich wrote:AC , i welcome veiws and opinions (that's what forums are for ) ,different to my own as a way of getting a second opinion on my own views. things are always changing, the beurocrats are making more rules to control our lives/rights every year. it' how they justify their own jobs don't stop commenting or discussing just because others may not agree
on my 1967 valiant i had, seatbelts were optional , and rego was a voluntary thing through auto clubs back in the day . times have changed. if any forum members are concerned about preserving their rights, join a more pro-active firearms group like shooters union , or NFC . that's what i've done . less than a carton of beer for a years membership
NSC are the greatest thing to happen to Aussie shooters and are the closest we have at the minute to the big bad NRA. Rumour is they are "friends" to the NSC so I hope the rumours are true. We need a rich gun lobby in this country to push for freedom. I honestly think we can scrap the PTA system, get cat C open to sport and rec users and use cat H on private property within the next 5-10 years. It is within the realm of possibilities that are not to far out there but we need these baby steps.
womble wrote:I disagree.
I think any links or collaborations with organisations such as the NRA in Australian shooting clubs would fast forward the loss of our gun ownership privileges entirely.
In Australia we only use guns for hunting, land conservation and sport.
In the distant past the NRA had that patronage. But what credibility they had left in that respect was ended with their response to Sandyhook. And they’ve never recovered from it.
Today the NRA exists solely to market guns to scared people, as a means to defend themselves. In the home of the hateful and the land of the fearful.
That’s not us mate. I don’t know why you persist in preaching this diatribe to this audience. You’re either in the wrong country or on the wrong forum.
Patriot wrote:“The creation of the great state of North Queensland would really be the first step and would put the rest of Queensland on its knees to give up some demands.”
I spent 10 years in NQ from 93 onwards, and this ridiculous attitude does prevail up there. I found a lot the people to a have a massive chip on their shoulder and a lot held the view they were owed something simply because the live north of Rocky.