Sergeant Hartman wrote:Damn so when shooters unions starred they were saying how ssaa were not doing anything... now ncs saying SU not doing anything... next month NFA will start up and say that NSC, SU, SSAA is not doing anything.
Who next
Rwd22 wrote:It'd be great if all these organisations could work together and not just point the finger at each other, we're all in this for the same thing.
marksman wrote:Rwd22 wrote:It'd be great if all these organisations could work together and not just point the finger at each other, we're all in this for the same thing.
l've been hearing that one for years
how to do it is the hard part,
one way would be to get rid of using the club membership as a reason for genuine need to hold a firearm licence
then members would become members because they want to be a part of that club not because they have to
l'm sure there would be a different outlook by the clubs towards what effects us then
Sergeant Hartman wrote:Damn so when shooters unions starred they were saying how ssaa were not doing anything... now ncs saying SU not doing anything... next month NFA will start up and say that NSC, SU, SSAA is not doing anything.
Who next
Oldbloke wrote:Sergeant Hartman wrote:Damn so when shooters unions starred they were saying how ssaa were not doing anything... now ncs saying SU not doing anything... next month NFA will start up and say that NSC, SU, SSAA is not doing anything.
Who next
AussieCapitalist wrote:Divided we fall.
I give SSAA a lot of s**t because I am just disappointed in their behaviour. If they can clean house and start being focused on firearm owners and not just making money from membership and range fees I will be a lot more positive with them. The NSC seems to be doing more than all other organisations at the moment so they have my praise. Their membership numbers are exploding as people are yearning for an organisation to represent their needs as a shooter.
Just think what the NSC have done in such a small time. If we keep up this pace we can have real reform within 5 years.
.
You do realise NSC just argued successfully against The application of appearance laws pertaining to a particular 12g firearm?
TassieTiger wrote:I hear you Sarge - but then what? Do nothing? Or get behind someone? Or sit on our hands and watch existing but timid firearm pillars erode?...God, I’m starting to sound like AC LOL.
I have no affiliation and I’m not quiet about being disgusted by SSAA business model and their support for QLD shops being closed.
To the best of my knowledge - the NSC has made progress and IS filing legal complaints regularly on behalf of shooters - that costs money and as AC has posted - IS achieving results...yes - another bus may drive along at any time, but by doing nothing - you inadvertently become part of the problem. Cant put it any Fairer?
And - in fact, I was responding to OB - but his quoted “agreement tick” with you, did not carry over in quotation.
AussieCapitalist wrote:I am not worried mate. A politician being involved in corrupt conduct is as sure as the sun going down today.
trekin wrote:Yeah, doesn't worry me either, but only because they haven't convinced me that they are any better than any of the other so called lobby groups out there. But I'll guarantee there will be a whole list of people worried about the connection between a corrupt pollie and a shooters lobby, starting with the media.