Larry wrote:The National Shooting Council has been very proactive and launched several court actions against Police and Governments. I think this organization is actually doing the things that we as shooters have wanted for a long time. They have the balls to stand up and take action. They have also tried to work in tandem with some of the other organizations, to present a united front.
If you want to get behind an organization to fight for your rights I think this is one of the most active and better ones to get behind. they are not trying to be everything to everyone they have a clear direction to fight for rights via political and court system means.
Dedd wrote:Not really the same, but if we ever organize enough for an actual protest maybe we could all turn up with rifle bags? They'd have to stretch the law pretty far to arrest anyone for carrying a bag, but it gets the point across.
BangWhizzClack wrote:Do you not see a problem with that Tassie? The police coming to the homes and arresting those that are promoting ideas counter to those that the MSM is pushing?
And you Womble, are you going to sit back all your life? Would you like me to fetch you a tube of lube for you so it's not so painful?
Dedd wrote:I do agree with what you're saying, but 99% of Australian gun owners just want to occasionally shoot paper or fur. If we tried to organise something like that, we'd end up with 5 people turning up and then being arrested.
We can't really do anything until we have public support and coming across as a scary group of people will only cause people to vote for even stricter laws.
Maybe once the average Australian doesn't void themselves at the sight of a .22 we can do something.
Dedd wrote:I do agree with what you're saying, but 99% of Australian gun owners just want to occasionally shoot paper or fur. If we tried to organise something like that, we'd end up with 5 people turning up and then being arrested.
We can't really do anything until we have public support and coming across as a scary group of people will only cause people to vote for even stricter laws.
Maybe once the average Australian doesn't void themselves at the sight of a .22 we can do something.
TassieTiger wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:Do you not see a problem with that Tassie? The police coming to the homes and arresting those that are promoting ideas counter to those that the MSM is pushing?
And you Womble, are you going to sit back all your life? Would you like me to fetch you a tube of lube for you so it's not so painful?
Maybe I should have put a sarcasm emoti.
I absolutely 100% see a a HUGE problem - it’s disgusting and I’m hoping a delegate from Maurice Blackburn or similar step up and cane the police in public and in court for a range of charges - I hope the police who undertook the action are sacked and their superior is shamed and named and removed from the force without benefits...I hope it goes all the way to the top and they get crucified...but will it happen ? Who is in a position to stand against the SS Nazi police ?
deye243 wrote:Dedd wrote:I do agree with what you're saying, but 99% of Australian gun owners just want to occasionally shoot paper or fur. If we tried to organise something like that, we'd end up with 5 people turning up and then being arrested.
We can't really do anything until we have public support and coming across as a scary group of people will only cause people to vote for even stricter laws.
Maybe once the average Australian doesn't void themselves at the sight of a .22 we can do something.
And this was the whole reason for the not carrying a firearm in an alarming way and hiding them under the back seat the people only get used to seeing a copper carrying a gun so they see a real person carrying a gun and they s*** themselves it only took 24 years.
deye243 wrote:Dedd wrote:I do agree with what you're saying, but 99% of Australian gun owners just want to occasionally shoot paper or fur. If we tried to organise something like that, we'd end up with 5 people turning up and then being arrested.
We can't really do anything until we have public support and coming across as a scary group of people will only cause people to vote for even stricter laws.
Maybe once the average Australian doesn't void themselves at the sight of a .22 we can do something.
And this was the whole reason for the not carrying a firearm in an alarming way and hiding them under the back seat the people only get used to seeing a copper carrying a gun so they see a real person carrying a gun and they s*** themselves it only took 24 years.
womble wrote:Thank you for the lube, i will use it liberally.
I just think your military coup / new republic is going to need a bigger army.
Dedd wrote:deye243 wrote:Dedd wrote:I do agree with what you're saying, but 99% of Australian gun owners just want to occasionally shoot paper or fur. If we tried to organise something like that, we'd end up with 5 people turning up and then being arrested.
We can't really do anything until we have public support and coming across as a scary group of people will only cause people to vote for even stricter laws.
Maybe once the average Australian doesn't void themselves at the sight of a .22 we can do something.
And this was the whole reason for the not carrying a firearm in an alarming way and hiding them under the back seat the people only get used to seeing a copper carrying a gun so they see a real person carrying a gun and they s*** themselves it only took 24 years.
Most definitely. We certainly need more more people interacting with firearms in a positive manner, but it needs to be done slowly so we don't scare the public further away. It's the same in the US, where people invite their antigun friends to shoot an AR15 and they finish they day wanting to buy one.
The Australian public won't suddenly start "picking up arms" unless they need to. Maybe one day thing will be so bad in this country that people will feel the need to arm themselves, but right now Karen feels safe driving her kids to and from soccer, so she doesn't think anyone in the country could have a need for a firearm. And unless you want to take on the military, those are the kind of people we need to convince.
Remember, the Eureka stockade was more people than we'd get today, and they were massacred.
TassieTiger wrote:Based on what I’ve witnessed on the smelly vision lately, it will only be a matter of hours before Bangbongsmoke has a few black suited men knocking on his door...If I were you mate, I’d turn out the lights and unplug the pc!
Skinna wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Based on what I’ve witnessed on the smelly vision lately, it will only be a matter of hours before Bangbongsmoke has a few black suited men knocking on his door...If I were you mate, I’d turn out the lights and unplug the pc!
LMAO...!!!...funniest comment of the financial year so far...!!
But im curious what smoke your talking about...you mean smoke from the bong, or smoke from the flash grenades...?
.
.
.
.
I get his point though...but carrying firearms isnt the answer...not yey anyway...
maybe people carrying a big target & lots of pictures of shooters at ranges/big smiles busting clays, as well as fatality car accident scenes, and pictures of foxes dying from 1080 that enables cheap supermarket lamb.
The population need a rational educating...not the perpetuation of the fear already instilled in them...
BangWhizzClack wrote:I'm saying we need to encourage more people to get into shooting while we have this opportunity. I'm not saying we need to hand them a rifle and goose step them into parliament. People genuinely need to know that they are the only ones looking out for their best interests, governments lie all the time as we have seen and they take away more liberties all the times. We need to be armed and have that written down along with better self defence laws so that government don't have a monopoly on use of force and we are left with our pants down.