winton wrote:Well, lockdown has put alot of pressure on families and relationships and finances. The Govt. is offering "supposed" mental health support that I've heard about, but if taking up this support means I'll lose my firearms license given Vic Pol's recent form, I'm gonna give it a miss, and I imagine anyone who thinks their smart would give it a miss also. Why take the chance?
Obviously, this is not to suggest that I am in need personally, or to suggest that you shouldn't access support, but I can understand people who have lost their jobs in lockdown needing it and would not like to see Vic Pol throw them under the bus like they did with covid breaches. I don't see why Vic Pol wouldn't throw them under, cause its part of their mandate to stop mentally challenged people from accessing firearms.
Let the debate begin. Would you accept such support, and have you know others who have had their license cancelled because they took up mental health support pre and post Covid.
BangWhizzClack wrote:
I wouldn't risk it. Unfortunately it's just the way of the world. I believe it's similar to police, military and Mafia culture. You need to see a shrink? You've actually just applied for retirement.
eddievic wrote:The bigger question is whether you should even have guns if your mental health is compromised? And can you even see that aspect.
Also i don't know if its like a voucher system where once you approved you can choose your own mental health professional. They have a confidentiality agreement with you to not share what you discuss with any other department. And as i said above if you are suicidal or in a bad way i rather you hand your guns over to someone until things can be worked out and go see a professional. Instead of things reaching breaking point and we hear person X shot his/her spouse or took their own lives.
In other cases the psychologist can write up a report to say you are fit to have a firearm license.
Or you can just pay for a few sessions privately, or you can get your GP to do up a health plan and that gives you a few sessions where the Federal government pays for the sessions.
I know a couple of people who see psychologist regularly and still have their licenses and guns etc
mchughcb wrote:No and No.
eddievic wrote:The bigger question is whether you should even have guns if your mental health is compromised? And can you even see that aspect.
Also i don't know if its like a voucher system where once you approved you can choose your own mental health professional. They have a confidentiality agreement with you to not share what you discuss with any other department. And as i said above if you are suicidal or in a bad way i rather you hand your guns over to someone until things can be worked out and go see a professional. Instead of things reaching breaking point and we hear person X shot his/her spouse or took their own lives.
In other cases the psychologist can write up a report to say you are fit to have a firearm license.
Or you can just pay for a few sessions privately, or you can get your GP to do up a health plan and that gives you a few sessions where the Federal government pays for the sessions.
I know a couple of people who see psychologist regularly and still have their licenses and guns etc
Oldbloke wrote:eddievic wrote:The bigger question is whether you should even have guns if your mental health is compromised? And can you even see that aspect.
Also i don't know if its like a voucher system where once you approved you can choose your own mental health professional. They have a confidentiality agreement with you to not share what you discuss with any other department. And as i said above if you are suicidal or in a bad way i rather you hand your guns over to someone until things can be worked out and go see a professional. Instead of things reaching breaking point and we hear person X shot his/her spouse or took their own lives.
In other cases the psychologist can write up a report to say you are fit to have a firearm license.
Or you can just pay for a few sessions privately, or you can get your GP to do up a health plan and that gives you a few sessions where the Federal government pays for the sessions.
I know a couple of people who see psychologist regularly and still have their licenses and guns etc
Eddie, you just said what I was thinking.
What's more important?
Your health? or
Your sport?
eddievic wrote:The bigger question is whether you should even have guns if your mental health is compromised? And can you even see that aspect.
Also i don't know if its like a voucher system where once you approved you can choose your own mental health professional. They have a confidentiality agreement with you to not share what you discuss with any other department. And as i said above if you are suicidal or in a bad way i rather you hand your guns over to someone until things can be worked out and go see a professional. Instead of things reaching breaking point and we hear person X shot his/her spouse or took their own lives.
In other cases the psychologist can write up a report to say you are fit to have a firearm license.
Or you can just pay for a few sessions privately, or you can get your GP to do up a health plan and that gives you a few sessions where the Federal government pays for the sessions.
I know a couple of people who see psychologist regularly and still have their licenses and guns etc
eddievic wrote:I know a couple of people who see psychologist regularly and still have their licenses and guns etc
Grandadbushy wrote:I agree Trekin this whole ''fit and proper '' person is an open book for the licencing branch people ie where as with the absolute smallest thing not even related to guns or the use there of can cause you to lose or be not able to obtain a gun licence
bigrich wrote:BangWhizzClack wrote:
I wouldn't risk it. Unfortunately it's just the way of the world. I believe it's similar to police, military and Mafia culture. You need to see a shrink? You've actually just applied for retirement.
i'm not that keen on the mafias interpretation of "retirement"
Grandadbushy wrote:Yep exactly right marksman this whole covid thing has awakened a monster it just shows what lengths a government will go to to hold power and how ill prepared the world is if a major event did happen , how governments and the individual politicians would turn on each other , just like now, with the blame game ,i don't remember garbage if their memory is that bad they shouldn't be making decisions for the country, imagine if you had a lawyer with a memory like that , yes these pollies don't realise they are becoming the laughing stock of humanity and placing our police in a compromising situation ,''damned if you do damned if you don't''
eddievic wrote:Omg GDB, that would make me absolutely livid. I feel for you. I hope my regular doctor wont be like that.
But its like the same situation where some older doctors refuse to prescribe the pill to young girls due to their Christian beliefs.
Interesting observation IB, i didn't know that, but many laws have been passed esp since the 9/11 thing happened which could easily be misused but any govt. And i was even more surprised when the law about a DHHS officer can deputise any person (with no qualification whatsoever) to detain a resident of Victoria. Was not given much coverage in mainstream media, or even here.