on_one_wheel wrote:Sucked in to him, hopefully he was told the refusal was because he's a complete tool.
Communism_Is_Cancer wrote:I don't know who he is but I don't see the reason to gloat on the issue. We need more licence holders not less. If he is not a criminal then I don't see why he should be denied.
Shootermick wrote:Communism_Is_Cancer wrote:I don't know who he is but I don't see the reason to gloat on the issue. We need more licence holders not less. If he is not a criminal then I don't see why he should be denied.
Actually the other blokes are right on this one. He is guilty of the crime of being an absolute tool. He’s one license holder we don’t need.
disco stu wrote:I'm not fully down on the pistol side of things, but it says he already has what I assume is a probationary pistol licence. Wouldn't this mean he already has cat a and b licence? I thought that was needed first of all.
Blr243 wrote:If you were a fit and proper person would you be associating with a major drug dealer ? Or would you just be hanging out with bobby the lawn mower man down the road, or Tim the soccer coach ?
Blr243 wrote:If you were a fit and proper person would you be associating with a major drug dealer ? Or would you just be hanging out with bobby the lawn mower man down the road, or Tim the soccer coach ?
Communism_Is_Cancer wrote:I don't know who he is but I don't see the reason to gloat on the issue. We need more licence holders not less. If he is not a criminal then I don't see why he should be denied.
Tiger650 wrote:You fly with the crows you get shot at.
Shootermick wrote:Maybe he wants his gun license so that he can join Bangwhizzcrack’s commune??